posted on Mar, 5 2009 @ 04:43 PM
I think neither should get it for according to religious books neither followed what their God told them exactly. You cant pick and choose what to go
with you either listen or you don't.
The Hebrews when they were lead of out Egypt God told them to kill everything in the land, they didn't listen to God so therefore the agreement is
null and void because they didn't live up to there part plain and simple.
If you say they didn't have to why should others listen to their God when God says the land is for them, they didn't listen we they were told
You have Abraham, Ishmael and Isaac and the different ideas of who should get what. Abraham and Sarah agreed to the how the creation of Ishmael came
to be than after the fact happened things changed.
By the traditions of the time Ishmael would have got the land plain and simple. God said Abraham and his offspring therefore that's all children of
Abraham therefore they should share and if they couldn't fix the family dispute neither should get it.
And if an agreement can not be mad neither should ever get it.
Before anyone says if I'm pro this or against this religion I'm agnostic and have no option of the two I'm going by what so and so text say.
[edit on 5-3-2009 by jatsc]