A new world order would be virtually impossible in the kind of world that we live in at present. There are over six billion people with such diverse
beliefs and customs, too many dissenters and and too many power seekers.
Remember Chernobyl? en.wikipedia.org...
Taking into consideration global wind patterns, the NWO have probably calculated how much nuclear material and toxic gases would need to be released
to kill off most humans on the planet. They already have the data from the aftermath of Chernobyl to work with.
Belarus suffered from approximately 70 per cent of the fallout from the Chernobyl catastrophe. There are high rates of morbidity in Belarus than
anywhere else affected by the Chernobyl catastrophe. And the elevated cancer rates in Belarus are 16 times higher than in those countries not affected
(1) Are the high rates of morbidity and elevated cancer in Belarus only applicable to people who were living in Belarus during the fallout? or who
moved to Belarus not long after the catastrophe, say 1986-1990?
(2) Has research been undertaken on animals and/or humans every few years since the Chernobyl disaster (1986) to try and determine when it would be
safe to introduce humans and/or animals into a location that has experienced heavy fallout without those animals and/or humans experiencing harmful
ailments/defects/side effects or fatalities ?
(3) I live in the UK and have never been to Belarus. If I were able to live and work in Belarus this year (2009), am I very likely to be harmfully or
fatally affected by the remnants of nuclear fallout from the Chernobyl disaster of 1986 (22 years ago)? Or has the residue from nuclear fallout now
dropped to a level that is considered safe to human health?
Data collected about nuclear fallout, from locations such as Belarus, would give governments/NWO an indication as to whether or not a deliberately
planned global nuclear catastrophe was a realistic option for reducing the world human population and how long survivors would be required to live in
underground camps/cities before reinhabiting above ground are that had experience heavy nuclear fallout.
For those chosen to survive underground; carbohydrates, protein, fats and vitamins could be stored in packets/containers. Above ground, radiation
would contaminate almost everything that humans would have hoped to survive on - plants, animals, tinned food, packaged food etc. Radiation would be
in the air, getting into every nook and cranny and it would probably also destroy harmful viruses such as HIV/AIDS and bacteria such as MRSA. What a
way to deal with most of the world's problems at once!
People living underground could probably be fed for decades using methods such as this www.factoryfarming.org.uk...
Slaughtered battery hens can be processed into soups, baby foods, stock cubes etc. Battery hens are bred to be lean, to eat little and lay a lot.
Wind farms and other forms of renewable energy, could possibly provide the electricity for those safely tucked away in underground camps/cities. Water
from the sea could be desalinated.
If most life were wiped out by a nuclear catastrophe, genetisists among the survivors, in underground camps/cities, could breed organisms such as blow
flies that would be released at numerous locations and multiply as they fed on carcasses. Genetic engineering could possibly also be used to increase
the species/number of plants, mammals, insects etc so as to replenish the earth once it was safe to do so.
When the human survivors came above ground to live, the released blow flies and other organisns, would have left them with more manageable skeletons
to clear up.
Those chosen to survive would be given identity cards, details of their DNA would be on a database to make crime detection easier, one set of laws
would cover all continents and everyone would be taught to speak the same language.