Part 11: Before I go into the history here, I want to jump back to one more thing that might not have caught your attention. I want to expand on to
what I meant by ‘your brain may be able to receive signals outside of your body’. In a nutshell this is showing a scientifically possible scenario
where your brain can get information, and maybe even telekinetic signals and signaling from far away places. We hear about all of these stories of
people through out history being prophets and other metaphysical stories, but nobody believes the old stories. One argument against psychic abilities
is that there are no modern prophets or psychic people known on a grand scale today. The fluoride in water shows why that may be.
Part 12: Why do they call it the pineal gland? Well, think about it. Its name comes from the fact that it is shaped very much like a pinecone.
Interestingly enough, no matter where you look in history (Egypt, Greece, Rome, South America, North America, Africa) there is a pinecone used as a
symbol. The symbol it self is almost always is shown with the king or ruler. Many people attribute this symbol to knowledge and power. For example,
the pharaoh always carried a staff with a pine cone at its tip. Even Native Americans worshiped the pinecone. The fact of the matter is, the pine cone
is known to have some kind linkage to knowledge and ruling government in almost all ancient societies
Part 13: Here’s where things get hairy. Although most of the ancient civilizations worshiped the pinecone, many of the civilizations didn’t even
have pinecones present in their natural environment. This points to the fact that some of these civilizations would be worshiping a picture of
something that they may never have seen before. Well, that doesn’t seem quite right. However, when you insert the above information about the pineal
gland to represent the symbol in all of the ancient writings things suddenly get clear. If biologists can use parsimony as a valid argument explaining
evolution, then using parsimony here to show that the symbol actually was meant to portray the pineal gland should be considered valid also.
Part 14: The last couple of parts have been a stretch, and the next few bits of information will also be a stretch, but you must remember, as unlikely
as this all seems (which is very unlikely) there is at the very least some scientific evidence that shows the pineal gland may be capable of such
extraordinary things.
Part 15: Lets expand on this idea just a bit. Maybe it’s possible that the ancients new something about a hypothetic pine cone gland, maybe not. But
let me ask you this. If you are American, or know anything about American culture, since when is the pinecone an important symbol to the American
people? I’m asking you this because there are certain high-ranking government buildings that have pinecones drawn into various places of the walls.
These building have many other drawings sketched into them as well. The drawings are very similar to that seen on the back of the dollar, which shows
a pyramid with a floating eye. . . the all seeing eye
Part 16: Modern day American government isn’t the only place that still thinks pinecones are important, if you were to go to the Vatican today, you
would see a statue of a pinecone taller than a person standing just outside the building. The pope apparently thought it was important enough to
spends lots of money to build. Interesting, the pinecone seems to be a reoccurring event, or pattern if you will. As we all know patterns must be
investigated.
Part 17: What’s going on here? Well there seems to be some kind of linkage to the gland, the government, and don’t forget fluoride in water,
turning this gland into stone.
Part 18: We are going to get abstract again. Okay as you all know, the pyramids are old. Very old. Scientists have done carbon 14 dating and
approximated the age of the pyramids. However, many scientists know that there is a problem with carbon 14 dating due to the fact that it is very easy
to get inaccurate readings. Many people think the carbon dating done to the pyramids is also inaccurate. The next thing Egyptian scientists did was
call in geologist with PhD’s in geology. The geologists then studied the pyramids to see how weathering and erosion caused them to get to their
current state. The result: the sand in the air eroding the pyramids from their original structure would have taken a long time to get them to their
current level much, much longer than carbon 14 dating shows. Furthermore, the geologist had a worst case scenario eroding rate, which would have
showed the pyramids under water with the water and sand eroding they pyramids at the fastest possible rate, and in this scenario (which is known to be
untrue) it still would have taken erosion more than twice as long as they are old to make them how they are now, meaning they must be much older t

