It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


What feminists don't realize

page: 1
<<   2  3 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 3 2009 @ 11:53 PM
To take over a country, you must destroy it's peoples will to fight; destroy men's will to fight.

Today women are seen as sex objects, or nothing more than life support for a vagina. Marrige rates plummetting, many young men feeling indifferent to women or downright hostile... The vast majority of today's women hear about a divorce settlement and giggle and light up with glee, completely incapable of empathy. Victums of divorce court are 4 times more likely to commit scuicide than rape victums. Who would have thought having everything you've worked for your whole life stolen, would be #ing tramatic. I would like to shed light on the reality that these victums and men who have witnessed these crimes will probally not very hospitable to women in this coming crisis... Fema camps, MILLIONS OF PLASTIC FEMA COFFINS (google it, seriously). Just pointing out that it would seriously behoove you women to atleast pretend to have some class.

So you know how criminal divorce court is, what men go through, that women find amusing. Settlements like these are not uncommon...
A post to a legal website while Darren Mack was on the run, authorities suspect it may have been him.

Here is the real numbers as was given to me in documents by Darren himself. Don´t let the fancy BS done by the attorneys fool you in the court motions. Remember most if not all has been falsely documented. I saw the real financial and bank records myself.
The order said¨.

44,000 income
15,000 income taxes that no-one remembered that had to be taken out. Remember income taxes?
29,000 left after taxes
10,000 spousal support as per Weller´s order
19,000 left after spousal support
14,000 all those items that were listed on the order by Weller but not put into dollars. Just the 2 morgages were 9,000 a month. I have seen the bank records.
5000 left after paying all the bills ordered to be paid by Weller.
849 child support for one child
1000 child support to the previous wife for another child.
3151 left after child support
6000 in interest paymts and other expences that Weller did not address in his order but had to be paid. Can´t tell the bank Weller said I don´t have to pay.
-2849 left after bills that must be paid that Weller did not address.
15000 a month for attys fees to fund a war that he tried to settle many times rather than go BK.
-17,849 left after attys fees. Remember Darren has yet to spend $1 on rent, food, gas, car, support one child full time that lived with him and one child that lived with him half time.
6000 a month for all the above. Darren had a minus cashflow of

$-23,849 per month

based on Judge Weller´s order. Live with that for 2 years!! and see if you need to file BK. Get a grip people.

So here it is in simple form. Weller a man making $44,000 a month to pay $61,849 before he got $1 to live on himself and to take care of his children when they lived with him. You make your own conclusion of fairness.

Remember criminals like Charla´s atty Shawn Meador and bought and paid for Judges can make anything look reasonable in court docs. The real test is how does it play out when you have to write the check and balance the checkbook. Don´t be fooled by the surface level BS. I have seen the bank records.

That is just one order. The first financial order that was posted is just one of 20 or more things that were Nazi like against Darren. By the way anyone who understands the law would know that he couldn't appeal until the entire case was finished including custody and the divorce decree issues. That is why those two things were stratigically put off by Shawn Meador into the future so as to keep Darren from any protection from another court. It is my understanding that he was in the middle of an emergency writ but those are very rarely issued.
They make up rules and they are the umpires so when they are crooked like in this case one has absolutely no chance at coming out without being robbed broke, put into BK, jailed, extorting the people around you, and then kidnapping your children. There is one place where one has no constitutional rights and that is in the 4 walls of the divorce court. It is just legalized organized crime.

It was not just with Darren but read and you will see hundreds of stories of the crimes that divorce industry are inflicting on mostly men thoughtout this country. They are plain out crimes. Read them and weep for crimes being waged against mostly men in this country.

posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 12:03 AM
Who is Darren Mack and why should feminists care about his story? If he neglected to mention things on his financial or legal paperwork and was penalized for his carelessness, how is that the fault of feminists?

Are you saying he is on the run rather than meet his court-ordered payments? I don't understand how this story relates to feminism. Please clarify.

posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 05:42 AM

Just pointing out that it would seriously behoove you women to atleast pretend to have some class.

I normally don't just get stuck on one line...but

Not a very good sentence to win over the crowd

PS...this is from a male....most women I have met have plenty of class and let's not forget quite a few of these divorces can be from some jerk male who treats her like crap, sleeps around and avoids all household and child responsibilities. Let's tell the whole story and not just the anti-female part. Women make mistakes but I gotta say from where I sit, there is plenty that men do to KEEP women down. They are objects because some male minds can't comprehend that a woman can do things as well as we can.

Those people need to wake up and start living today.


posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 06:53 AM
reply to post by insignificanthuman
I am female and I agree with you 100/% that men get a raw deal in the maintainance stakes.But not all women are money grabbing so and so's.The trouble is respect in society seems to have broken down and as a result ROMANCE IS DEAD.But please don't be so anti-women because there's some of us who have stood on our own two feet after a divorce.

posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 09:30 AM
The safest thing to do is to not trust women period.

(I know ill get flamed for this)

In today's society many (not all) women see children as potential paychecks. The only reason they get deeply involved with a man is to get pregnant and then split with the kid and get that child support check. They have no interest in how this will affect that man.

Many (again not all) women don't realize that men actually have emotions and feelings, and don't care that it destroys a man completely when someone they deeply love is taken away from them.

But of course men are jerks right? We are cheaters and wife beaters and thats the only reason women are "FORCED" to get a divorce. Oh no perish the thought that a woman wants to take off with the kids to live with someone who makes more money. That never happens. It's only men's fault.

Equality for some women it seems is half of the mans paycheck. Thanks but no thanks, been there, done that, lost the T shirt in the divorce.

posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 10:23 AM
From time to time these women bashing threads show up on ATS and it's just discouraging to try to reason with the bashers.

I've come to realize that the bashers don't want to see the other side; they just need an outlet for their rant. Being a single mom with no man to "protect" me (from other men), rants like this just make me stock up on ammo and call realtors looking for more remote places to live.

For an idea on what a world without "evil" women in it would be like, I recommend you read White Plague by Frank Herbert.

posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 09:27 PM
reply to post by whitewave

"Who is Darren Mack and why should feminists care about his story? If he neglected to mention things on his financial or legal paperwork and was penalized for his carelessness, how is that the fault of feminists?

Are you saying he is on the run rather than meet his court-ordered payments? I don't understand how this story relates to feminism. Please clarify."

Darren Mack was a successful small business owner named Reno man of the year a few years before his criminal divorce. Look at his checkbook balance in my first post. So one morning he stabbed his ex wife to death in her home and then snipered the judge though his office window 2 hours later. He was apprehended 11 days later in Mexico.

Feminism brought about the criminal enterprise that is called family court, and with it the prevalent attitude of todays women that robbing a man of everything, if amusing. Divorce rates are 60%, how do you think men that have gone through, or witnessed these crimes, will feel about women getting raped by foreign troops, most likely the human rights cherishing chinese or Mexican troops who let the sex trade of 12 - 15 year old girls run rampant and become one of the three top sources of income over the border once martial law is enacted and the FEMA camps are running. Our military is worn out and stretched thin involved in two fronts overseas, foreign assets will be called in to patrol our streets. Bush has signed a bill allowing this in case of civil unrest, he has met with Vincent Fox in not as secret as he'd have liked meetings about this...

Blogs that share my viewpoint are not exactly hard to find these days... There are a growing number of men who's love for women has been destroyed by family courts and other anti men criminal practices , and will not risk thier life for women when the time comes...

posted on Mar, 4 2009 @ 11:06 PM
reply to post by insignificanthuman

I get it. Rich guy with trophy wife murders the love of his life and it's HER fault. What a biotch! :shk:

Love to stay and chat, boys, but it sounds like it's time for me to make another ammo run.

OP, you wouldn't happen, by chance, to BE Darren Mack would you? Close relative maybe? Friend of a friend?

posted on Mar, 5 2009 @ 04:26 AM
I think Jack Nicolson summed it up quite well in the film "As Good As It Gets".

He was a successful writer, and when asked how he writes his female characters so well he replied something like this:

"I take a man and I remove accountability and reason".

That has stuck in my mind ever since hearing it, I didn't find it funny but quite thought provoking and enlightening.

I feel sorry for all the children who will grow up not knowing or having a father though and who live in a world with the distorted bitterness and needs of mothers and the rejection and suffering of their fathers. They are our human future, a future based on the weaknesses of their elders be they deliberately inflicted or accidental.

It takes courage to be alone these days.... living in a "fingers crossed" world where a marriage certificate or child can be a paycheck to some and a source of great financial, emotional and spiritual loss to others.

I don't do "fingers crossed" anymore.

posted on Mar, 5 2009 @ 05:41 AM
woooo doggie there is some women haitin here....

You're rght folks...romance is dead...women are evil and emotionless...thank goddess I got the one good woman how envious others must be of me when I tell then our marriage has nothing to do with money or kids and that this pretty little gal will stick with me and has stuck with me through thick and thin just as I have with her.

Then again...what do I tell all the other husbands who have wives just like mine? Romance is dead? ah well...

Look folks, I a not saying it doesn't happen. There are certainly some messed-up women out there after a paycheck. I've been in the military and I have seen it happen but let's try not to do what many are quick to do and lump the rest of the women in that category...or even most of them because frankly you don't know that to be true.

now to the OP

So lemme get this straight...

This man murders his wife and a judge and he is the victim...well whitewave...I think I am with you...I am done with topic

adios folks


posted on Mar, 5 2009 @ 01:12 PM
reply to post by insignificanthuman

If one has babies, they need to pay for their support. If one does not want to pay any kind of child support, do not have babies. I do not care about who did what to whom, but I do care about what happens to the children. The woman should get a job and pay her fair share too, and the man should get visitation rights. Both need to realize it is not about them anymore, but to the innocent ones they brought into this world. I do not have any sympathy for either the mother or the father, but for the children.

posted on Mar, 5 2009 @ 01:30 PM
reply to post by kidflash2008

I do not have any sympathy for either the mother or the father, but for the children.

Which is the only thing important in a divorce. I fought tooth and nail to try and keep my son with me because I knew what would happen if she got custody. Guess what? I was right, I havent seen my son in over two years now (going on three) and I doubt I will ever be able to see him again.

Which sucks because I love my boy. The child support while it does make it more difficult for me to live is something that I pay because it goes to him. He is the important party not her.

But according to feminists, it simply must be my fault because im a man. Nice. Yep she splits out and starts living with her new boyfriend, and I am to blame.

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 01:30 AM
reply to post by kidflash2008

Women have the pill, patches, and the morning after pill there is no such thing as an unplanned pregnancy for women (men can be in for a suprise though: lying about being on the pill, "forgetting" haha). Women have complete control over wether or not they want to get pregnant. It's also her child, men have no rights if she decides to kill it.

Men have two forms of birth control available to them, condem and abstinence, both reduce pleasure. A male pill has been developed and feminists are successfully campaining against it being produced. Ha Why? Would it say hurt single mothers by choice...

[edit on 6-3-2009 by insignificanthuman]

[edit on 6-3-2009 by insignificanthuman]

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 02:35 AM
reply to post by KyoZero

I'm saying Darren Mack was justified in what he did. He was a victum of a crime that was going to end his life (look at his checkbook balance), and he wanted justice. I used his story to illistrate criminal family court is, as ruling like these are not uncommon. It's in womens best interest to stop supporting these crimes through openly lighting up with glee or by doing nothing.

The attitude that represents the vast majority of todays women regarding divorce is amusement, "your such a strong woman", "you take it that man". Victums of divorce are 4 times more likely to commit scuicide than rape victums. Thats class? Although women used to frown upon this classless act in past times, seems without a strong and moral man to tell them whats right and wrong, they don't know the difference; hence the saying - you can't blame a woman for what she does wrong in the same way you can't blame a dog for what it does wrong, it's your fault for not training her properly.

Over 90% of businesses with females representing over 50% of the workforce fail (studies like this are deemed sexist and burried).

Women can become cops, fire fighters and marines because we twist the rules so much it's as if they were a #ing pretzel. And they shoot more people, both accidently and intentionally, endanger the lives of victums and thier peers... Quotas with college and the workforce, as well as sexual harrasment lawsuits, or theat of one if women don't get thier way help a bit I daresay. Equal opportunity doesn't neccesarily dictate equal outcome, so feminists campaign for a leg up.

For an entertaining and enlightening experience go look at all the magazines marketed twoards women and you'll see for the most part women have no real interests besides themselves and more accomplished whores. History is of course no exeption to women's lack of interest, as women live primarily in the present (fashion trends, being way over represented in the subprime mortgage fiasco, ect.) so they vote socialist due to thier whorish nature of expecting handouts, not knowing all socialist nations fail. Federal reserve 1913, womens sufferage 1920, so the bankers could grow thier empire. Women are also much more suggestable and susceptable to conforming to peer pressure; womens sufferage is a curse.

Andrea Yates drowned her 5 children in her bathtub because "she wanted to get back at her husband for working too much", surveys show over 60% of woman blamed her drowning her 5 children on her husband. She's well on the path to being released from her minumum security mental institution. Women are not held legally responsible for thier actions anywhere close the same degree men are, as there are no woman criminal, just women who make really big mistakes. What do these rampant rulings say if not women are too stupid and immature to be held accountable for thier actions. It's the new chilvary.

[edit on 6-3-2009 by insignificanthuman]

[edit on 6-3-2009 by insignificanthuman]

[edit on 6-3-2009 by insignificanthuman]

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 02:47 AM
Science Agrees with me. Ever wonder why theres never been a famous female composer, womens impact on the field of inventions is #, why they can memorize information but as far as leading a company with ideas they are inferior?

Men use 6.5 times more gray matter an women just white matter.

It shows clearly that that the MAN BRAIN intelligence is based on gray matter and the woman "intelligence" is based on white matter.

Elephants have much more gray matter and white matter than us, what matters is the architecture of using those matters ,they don't use that gray matter how men do.

Grey matter is a major component of the central nervous system, consisting of nerve cell bodies (neurons), glial cells (astroglia and oligodendrocytes), capillaries, and short nerve cell extensions/processes (axons and dendrites).

The white matter is the tissue through which messages pass between different areas of gray matter within the nervous system. Using a computer network as an analogy, the gray matter can be thought of as the actual computers themselves, whereas the white matter represents the network cables connecting the computers together

This means that if someone uses white matter that person is just "reading" from memory.

If someone uses gray matter that means he's processing that information.

And this are the differences between men and women, women tap into their memory when solving a problem while men process the information in the brain and seek the most logical way to solve it.

I don't know why women had to have so close reaction times in solving IQ tests as men, because that's what IQ test is, how fast your reactions are ,no logical thinking required there because those tests are very easy.

I guess the speed with witch women tap into their memory matches the speed with witch men process information ,that's the closest explanation.

And this shows clearly that women are useless pieces of # ,they only memorize and copy they never THINK and this is why all science,knowledges.inventions are MADE BY MEN.

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 03:23 AM
reply to post by insignificanthuman

lol....excessive, but your posts contain many truths. well done.

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 03:33 AM
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 05:48 AM
Totally worthless and never invent anything

got it

please explain the following

Antifungal antibiotic (Nystatin)-Rachel Fuller Brown and Elizabeth Lee Hazen

Battery container Nancy Perkins

COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language) Grace Hopper

Dishwasher Josephine Cochran

Electric hot water heater Ida Forbes

Elevated railway Mary Walton

Kevlar Stephanie Kwolek

Life raft Maria Beaseley

Medical syringe Letitia Geer

Refrigerator Florence Parpart

Safety device for elevators Harriet Tracy


1903 Marie Sklodowska Curie
1963 Maria Goeppert Mayer

1911 Marie Sklodowska Curie
1935 Irene Joliot-Curie
1964 Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin

Physiology & Medicine:
1947 Gerty Radnitz Cori
1977 Rosalyn Sussman Yalow
1983 Barbara McClintock
1986 Rita Levi-Montalcini
1988 Gertrude Elion
1995 Christiane Nusslein-Volhard
2004 Linda B. Buck
2008 Francoise Barre-Sinoussi

Did you ever once consider that maybe the reason women never get anything done is that men have held them down for centuries?

But fire away on that above list


posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 08:20 AM

Originally posted by insignificanthuman

I used that example to show how criminal divorce is, hoping to evoke empathy for the men who are put through this ideal, or atleast show feminists they are digging thier graves through thier current behavior.

Actually it sounds like a thinly veiled threat. IOW, if women don't quit irking us men, we'll rape and slaughter you while dancing in the street.

You didn't read my first post through, look at his checkbook balance.

I read it. He made $44,000.00 a year and "forgot to pay his taxes", neglected to properly fill out financial documents, etc. He was Reno man of the year? What exactly earned him that title?

And you also might not refer to his ex as the love of his life.

Apparently she was when he married her.

This story relates to feminism because feminism spurred these criminal divorce settlements, and it is feminists who will ultimately pay the price when, again men who have been victums of, or witnessed thse proceedings will not particularly care when they see these women get raped and slaughtered.

As opposed to how "caring" they were when women were being beaten and raped by their husbands for millenia? Or being burned on their husbands funeral pyres? Or being allowed to float down the streets during monsoons because they were "only girl children"? Or being left on the communists door steps because girls have no value? Or being burned at the stake for the crime of becoming property owners through their practice of herbal medicine? How dare those feminists try to keep women alive!

And I think Darren Mack was a man saint who demanded justice, and we will see more like him with Obama habitually talking about deadbeats dads.

Your heros are murderers?

And your a single mother by choice.

No. My husband had a schizoid break (much like your hero, Darren Mack) and ran home to moma. We had a marriage other people envied until that point.

Haha realitor, yep some poor sucker is funding your classless whore self, so mommy can be free to slut around at the expense of her child likely being one of the 70% of percent of prison inmates raised by single mothers, or a stripper, isn't that really neat? "Your such a strong woman."

Aside from being totally uncalled for and patently false on every count, your ranting (and misspelled) diatribe is against the T&C. No one is funding me. I haven't had sex since my divorce 8 years ago and my children are fine, thank you. I AM a strong woman. Thanks for noticing.

[edit on 6-3-2009 by whitewave]

posted on Mar, 6 2009 @ 08:27 AM
reply to post by insignificanthuman

For a male who uses so much more gray matter than us lowly females, you certainly misspell a lot of words.

Also, the highest IQ EVER recorded is that of a woman, Marilyn vos Savant.
Marilyn vos Savant's intelligence quotient (I.Q.) score of 228, the highest ever recorded, brought the St. Louis-born writer instant celebrity and earned her the sobriquet "the smartest person in the world."

top topics

<<   2  3 >>

log in