It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FAR 25 states: "that insulation material can not be used that is hazardous, unreliable, or contributes smoke/fire."
COMMENT by Ed Block: "No particular uses of insulation were further specified so insulation material includes; seat insulation, insulation blankets, rug insulation, acoustic and wire insulation. They are all types of insulation materials. Unless they are tested with an electrical fire (2,000 degrees) igniter to prove flammability proof, the material can not meet FAR 25 requirements. By their own (limited) standards, the FAA has said, in fact, that most types of wire cannot be used!"
"Only TKT wire insulation (BMS 13-60) meets FAR 25 Standards." (Ed Block)
* Airbus A310 (all)
* Airbus A320 (currently) 2
* Airbus A330 (currently)
* Airbus A340 (currently)
* B727 (after 1979, EB)
* B737 (after 1979 to 1990)
* B747-400 (some from 1989 - 1991)
* B757 (up until 1990)
* B767 (up until 1991)
* BAe 146 (unconfirmed reports)
* DC-10
* MD-8x (all)
* MD-11 (up until early 1992)
* A300 -600 (with Teflon top-coat)
* L-1011 Tristar
* Concorde SST
* B-707 (but not according to EB)
* Dassault Mercure
* CL 600 Series (but not RJ/CL604 or Global Express (Challenger)
* Shorts SD-330
* Gulfstream G-II, G-III
* HS125-700
* Bell 212, 214
* Sikorsky S-61, S-70B, S-76
* Westland 606
* Plus 31 military types such as P-3, C130, F-14, F-18, Hawkeye, etc
Still used by AIRBUS
in A319, A320, A330, A340
until about 2005
* Thickness: 8.4 microns
(Very thin)
* Weight: 4.6 lbs per 1,000 ft
(Very light weight)
* Rated temperature: 200�C
* 'Explodes' and burns fiercely at flash-over during an arc tracking event due to the production of free hydrogen, severely damaging adjacent wires and igniting surrounding structure. (i.e. behaves like detonator fuse.) 1
* High ignition temperature to start burning (usually associated with an electrical short circuit of 5000�C), but when it does finally ignite it burns very fiercely (explodes) creating virtually no smoke.
* Fumes are clear and fairly benign.
* Susceptible to wet and dry Arc Tracking.
* Susceptible to aging in that it dries out forming hairline cracks which can lead to micro current leakage (i.e. electrical 'ticking' faults ) which in turn can eventually culminate in an explosive arc tracking event. (i.e. short circuit) 1
* Stiffness (straight line memory) makes it prone to vibration chafing, (rubbing) and stressed by bending.
* Abrasive to other wires. (due to its hardness)
* Hygroscopic (i.e. absorbs water ) rendering it susceptible to wet arc tracking.
* Installation difficulties (difficult to strip and mark)
* Banned by
* US Air Force
* US Navy
* Canadian military
* Boeing in 1992
* Bombardier?
* B747 (currently)
* B757 (currently)
* B767 (currently)
* B777 (currently)
* BAe146
* Airbus A320
* Airbus A330
* Airbus A340
Still used by BOEING in
B747, B757, B767, B777
and Airbus
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Emirates "unhappy" with A380?
Reports have surfaced that Emirates has given Airbus a 46 page report stating that they are unhappy with the performance of at least one of their A380s that they've taken delivery of. They have had service cancellations related to burned wiring, missing cabin fittings, and engine issues.
The company has said that technical issues with any new aircraft are to be expected, and they stand by that they are adding 7 more aircraft to their fleet, but are in talks to delay delivery of at least some of them.
Clark said Emirates had also informed Airbus about technical issues with the four A380 jets it has in service already. "We just highlighted areas where we''ve had issues with the A380s," Clark said. "It''s quite normal that there would be some problems with the aircraft as it has just entered into service. Overall, we''re very happy with the performance of the aircraft and Airbus are bending over backwards to keep us happy."
The A380 “is an excellent aircraft and feedback from our customers thus far has been very positive,” the biggest Arab airline said today. “We have no plans to cancel any orders.”
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Airbus' version of TKT PROBABLY meets FAR 25, but Airbus won't release the information to certify it as compliant.
Originally posted by FredT
Interesting there was another thread where the claim was fuel burn was worse than expected.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Their first aircraft was grounded from July until September of last year when they found an electrical problem during routine maintenance.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
EK have subsequently said that they are very happy with the aircraft -
Clark said Emirates had also informed Airbus about technical issues with the four A380 jets it has in service already. "We just highlighted areas where we''ve had issues with the A380s," Clark said. "It''s quite normal that there would be some problems with the aircraft as it has just entered into service. Overall, we''re very happy with the performance of the aircraft and Airbus are bending over backwards to keep us happy."
www.intesatrade.it...&idNot=1729258
The A380 “is an excellent aircraft and feedback from our customers thus far has been very positive,” the biggest Arab airline said today. “We have no plans to cancel any orders.”
www.bloomberg.com...
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Airbus' version of TKT PROBABLY meets FAR 25, but Airbus won't release the information to certify it as compliant.
The wiring most certainly does comply, since the FAA certified the design and build with no exemptions for the wiring. No doubt there at all.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
The FAA also is still allowing aircraft to be built with wiring that does NOT comply with FAR 25. There is only one type of wiring that meets FAR 25, and that's TKT. Every aircraft flying around without it does not comply with FAR 25. The only aircraft that ARE using wiring compliant with FAR 25 are 737s and 757s built after 1992.