It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Subjects Off Limits at ATS

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:27 AM
link   
What's the deal. There are some subjects that seem just a wee bit too hot to be discussed here. ATS is really starting to show its true colors.

Whatever you do.. don't mention FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds and Asscroft invoking the rarely used States Secrets Privelege

Don't discuss 9-11 cellphone use

and then there was that popular guy WITD....

Where's he when you need him?




posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:29 AM
link   
yeah and don't call Jesus a terrorist, unless you want to get crucified by the ATS community and than have your thread buried.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:31 AM
link   
You're really showing your arse along with your lack of intelligence.

Good luck.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:32 AM
link   
Oh smell the drama.

I think what ECK means is, don't post crap that has already been posted a hundred times already.

Including a post by yourself 4 days ago.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:33 AM
link   
Just because noone agrees with your outlandish concepts or has any interest in them does NOT MEAN the subjects are off limits on ATS.

It means NOBODY cares, agrees or is interested. The fact you site a wannabe HOAXER as someone you "wish was here for you" tells all...

Bleh.

m...



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:34 AM
link   
Kano, please show links to the 100 threads you mentioned.

Valhall, I expected you to show up.
You are so in my hand, baby.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Springer
Just because noone agrees with your outlandish concepts or has any interest in them does NOT MEAN the subjects are off limits on ATS.

It means NOBODY cares, agrees or is interested. The fact you site a wannabe HOAXER as someone you "wish was here for you" tells all...

Bleh.

m...


Hey Springer, do you and V have a life outside of defending the pResident?



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by EastCoastKid
What's the deal. There are some subjects that seem just a wee bit too hot to be discussed here. ATS is really starting to show its true colors.

Whatever you do.. don't mention FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds and Asscroft invoking the rarely used States Secrets Privelege

Don't discuss 9-11 cellphone use

and then there was that popular guy WITD....

Where's he when you need him?


Don't know about Sibel Edmonds and Ashcroft thing yet, but you can bet I'll look into now!

9-11 cell phones I can't see being a problem. What are you talking about as your case in point? I've read posts in the distant past about them and many other aspects of 911.

WITD I think has simply become a pain in the ass more than anything, and that is why ATS mods don't like it. The whole subject has had it's share of Info and DisInfo that has come as a result also making it a mess in figuring out which is which.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by EastCoastKid[/i

Valhall, I expected you to show up.
You are so in my hand, baby.



That's an extremely disgusting thought.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:36 AM
link   
I wonders (yes with an s, cause i can) whatever became of Brain-whatchamacallit-jesus...

wonder if he is still keeping the J thang on the lock down in AUS?



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:36 AM
link   
Oh yeah, I love the emphasis on NOT MEAN. That must mean you're being AUTHORITATIVE, right?



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:37 AM
link   
Are'nt too many subjects off limits ECK....
You can talk about 9-11 conspiracies and theories till your literally blue in the face, but do it within those threads that are relating to you what you are posting about or to the one thread created especially for such discussions, being it houses virtually every known link and type of discussion.

Your seem to have not grasped the understanding that re-hash of rerehashed topics is going to be shut down, explicitly for the reason cited: re-hash of already rere-hashed same topic.

What is the issue?
Now you want to make an 'issue of conspiracy' out of standing ATS policy?
What exactly have you not or are not understanding here?


seekerof



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:37 AM
link   
You know it was a turn of phrase, there are indeed a ton of threads already on the subject though. As you would know had you bothered to search.

You made one yourself 4 days ago, why start another one today? If you are upset that more people aren't agreeing with you thats your problem. It does not give you the right to spam the board with reposts of old threads.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:41 AM
link   
me naughty bits is a topic best not discussed as well


Spiderj



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by mOjOm

Originally posted by EastCoastKid
9-11 cell phones I can't see being a problem. What are you talking about as your case in point? I've read posts in the distant past about them and many other aspects of 911.




Here's a study that was done. It's very interesting.

'Project Achilles' - Final Report and Summary of Findings

by A. K. Dewdney - 19th April 2003

During the early months of the year 2003, the author conducted three experiments to determine whether and how well cellphones could be operated from aircraft. The first flight (Part One) was essentially a probe of the experimental situation, to acquire some primary data and to work out a simple, readily implemented protocol. The results of Part Two (Diamond Katana 4-seater) have already appeared in these pages. The results of Part Three (Cessna 172-R) appear immediately below.

Since this completes the suite of experiments, it is appropriate to summarize the findings and to draw some conclusions. The conclusions are based partly on the experiments and partly on two other sources. (See Appendix B at the end of the report.) Expert opinion and eyewitness testimony are acceptable not only in court, but in certain scientific inquiries where events are of short duration or experiments are too expensive or impossible to carry out. Of course, eyewitness accounts do not carry the same weight as expert opinions or actual experiments, but the eyewitness accounts quoted below seem to be both consistent and compelling.

Disclaimer: The companies hired to assist in this experiment, namely Empire Aviation and Cellular Solutions, both of London, Ontario, Canada, acted as disinterested commercial parties, with no stake in the outcome or even knowledge of the purpose of the tests.

www.the7thfire.com...



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kano
You know it was a turn of phrase, there are indeed a ton of threads already on the subject though. As you would know had you bothered to search.

You made one yourself 4 days ago, why start another one today? If you are upset that more people aren't agreeing with you thats your problem. It does not give you the right to spam the board with reposts of old threads.


You said there were at least a hundred threads on that already. So show us. Not picking a fight with you. Its just that if there are say 4 threads, that's hardly 100.



posted on Apr, 17 2004 @ 01:47 AM
link   
Well really, even 4 threads on a topic is more than enough. Even if there was only 4 threads you still don't need to go out and start new ones.

But, if we are going to be petty jerks then I said 'posted a hundred times already'. Not 100 threads. I'm pretty sure in all the mountainous pile of 9-11 related threads, the issue of pre 9-11 translations and what was known beforehand has been posted a good deal more than 100 times.

Now, as far as your cellphones post. That is the THIRD time you have posted that exact thing. That is enough.

Thread closed.




top topics



 
0

log in

join