It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jackphotohobby
Alien visitation isn't something I think is impossible, it's just that I think it is improbable.
-----
So, I'd change my mind, but it would take a lot of high quality evidence.
[edit on 3-3-2009 by jackphotohobby]
Originally posted by Tokis Phoenix
So basically you believe because of the possibility of existence rather than the evidence of existence, because you can't rule out the possibility of existence?
Originally posted by Tokis Phoenix
As the title says, why do you believe in alien UFO's? With all the space debris floating around, top secret advanced military aircraft technology and weird & rare weather phenomenons going around, why do you believe there are alien UFO's?
IMHO it would be nice to believe that advanced aliens existed and all that, but so far i have never seen any convincing evidence that UFO's have anything to do with aliens. Even if i had a personal experience seeing a UFO for myself, i would likely put it down to something like top secret military stuff or falling space debris etc.
Originally posted by N3krostatic
I have seen my share and honestly when you start to think from a realistic perspective the odds don't favor us.
Originally posted by N3krostatic
We can take and compare our planet or species to a grain of sand and then compare that to the entire beach and all other beaches in the world. Then take that and compare our 1 grain to any other possible grains of sand in our entire universe all combined. That is us trying to say that this 1 grain (earth) is the only possible one that can support life and intelligent species in the whole universe and in all of time and existence.
Originally posted by N3krostatic
That seems a little ignorant and self defeating to me.
It is our lack of understanding and knowledge that lead us to these types of conclusions and it only shows our lack of logical maturity.
Originally posted by jephers0n
We believe because we have a choice to.
You disbelieve because you have made your choice as such.
Originally posted by The Savage Khan
I would say that close to 99% of the UFO/Alien information is either related to selling a product or making money or just plain old uneducated people searching for an escape from their boring lives. But all you need is for 1% to be true to validate that aliens are visiting our planet.
Originally posted by The Savage Khan
I would say that close to 99% of the UFO/Alien information is either related to selling a product or making money or just plain old uneducated people searching for an escape from their boring lives. But all you need is for 1% to be true to validate that aliens are visiting our planet.
Originally posted by Rakshan
There are a lot of folks who have seen alien UFOs for the very reason that they're attempting communication with them. It sounds crazy, I know, but it's true. It kind of makes sense to me. I mean, if they're close by, and if we're attempting communication in the right spirit, why wouldn't they make their presence known?
Originally posted by Rakshan
There is a ton of disinformation out there. And unless you make the effort to really dig in and wade through the madness, you'll only see what's spoon fed to you through the media, through the entertainment industry, hell, even from our own government at times.
You raise a great point, though. There are a ton of people in the US who feel this way because we HAVE been fed so much disinformation over the years. Those guys have gotten really good at it.
Originally posted by Rakshan
Originally posted by simonecharisse
Talk-host George Noory of Coast-To-CoastAM, has his producer in contact with a military guy who "inherited 18 cannisters of reel-to-reel military film" "some of which shows President Eisenhower with Howard Hughs, in a warehouse, looking at alien bodies and wreckage". They are waiting for this whistleblower to hand over his stuff, as promised.
HOPE it's not another 'Santilli' film!
Stories like this have been around for years, and I for one hope they're true! Don't get your hopes set on it, though. If it does happen, who's going to cover the story? Really, stop and ask yourself that VERY important question ... who would cover that story? CNN? FOX?
Originally posted by reasoner
Originally posted by The Savage Khan
I would say that close to 99% of the UFO/Alien information is either related to selling a product or making money or just plain old uneducated people searching for an escape from their boring lives. But all you need is for 1% to be true to validate that aliens are visiting our planet.
I understand. But if other explanations can account for 99%, what other than faith makes us believe that there must exist a 1% which cannot be explained?
...
Anyway, I can't quite buy the idea that the existence of a lot of noise implies there must be a signal. It could be all noise.
Originally posted by reasoner
I don't know. If they are real aliens , then by definition we can't project our human motives or values onto them.
Originally posted by reasoner
My question is: does the fact that some people with a large interest in alien UFOs have multiple encounters with them raise your belief that these are objective phenomena or lower it?
Originally posted by reasoner
Having an open mind about UFOs includes considering non-alien hypotheses as well (as many here do).
Originally posted by reasoner
If so, I think we need to investigate the waste of taxpayer money to pay people to spread disinformation. There is no need for public funding for that; it's quite clear that amateurs are doing a great job of voluntarily spreading rumors and misconceptions and hoaxes, without needing any government funds. Why pay government employees, if the private sector is doing it for free, or as part of their own private enterprise and entrepenuerial initiative.
Or to put it another way: what percentage of the chaff postings on ATS do you believe are generated by paid disinformation agents? I would guess 0%. Not because the PTB would not be willing - but because they don't need to.
reasoner