It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bonez
I'm not sure which pictures you mean unless you're talking about the one's on the last page of the jet engine and car. I have no idea when they were taken, but I would assume they were taken before the towers collapsed as there would be dust and paper everywhere in those pictures after the collapses.
Originally posted by D.Duck
The plane was hanging half in and half out of the Empire State Building.
bonez
You obviously Googled the ESB story, but you have to research ALL aspects of a topic before commenting on it. You can't just go Google something and then post only the parts that are relevant to your agenda.
Originally posted by D.Duck
The sooner you realize you were watching a "movie" on 9/11, the sooner you will find out what was really going on.
D.Duck
You can see that the engine is a 737 and tell that it is not as large as a 767 engine because of its comparison to the street sign. But you will have some that will argue that, but we know that a 767 with no blades is 48inches and with blades is 84 inches. That sign is not near four feet across, no matter how many bonez look at it, it won't turn it into a 767 engine.
Originally posted by D.Duck
reply to post by Soloist
Soloist,
Could you tell me what you were doing in the control room?
D.Duck
Originally posted by D.Duck
reply to post by Soloist
How long is your delay on the live feeds.
D.Duck
Originally posted by D.Duck
reply to post by Soloist
Soloist,
I have just written you off as a guy who make statements out of thin air and are not willing contribute to the research about 9/11.
D.Duck
Every one of those are fake CGI planes and they are easy to do.
Watch this clip and you can see how it was done, very easy job.
Originally posted by D.Duck
reply to post by Soloist
Well if you are that professional you would have immediately seen that the plane are CGI.
Every real professional laugh at the live feeds and amateurs videos.
D,Duck
Originally posted by Soloist
Originally posted by D.Duck
reply to post by Soloist
Well if you are that professional you would have immediately seen that the plane are CGI.
Every real professional laugh at the live feeds and amateurs videos.
D,Duck
Great answer.
Nice way to dodge the question. I was there and saw NO CGI planes.
You have just proven that you have no idea what you are talking about. You claim it was easy to do but offer no evidence (other than a youtube video) or explanation to back that claim. Those of us that have worked in the industry are interested in your "easy" way, please share it with us so we don't have to do things the hard way anymore.
Originally posted by Soloist
Originally posted by D.Duck
reply to post by Soloist
Well if you are that professional you would have immediately seen that the plane are CGI.
Every real professional laugh at the live feeds and amateurs videos.
D,Duck
Great answer.
Nice way to dodge the question. I was there and saw NO CGI planes.
You have just proven that you have no idea what you are talking about. You claim it was easy to do but offer no evidence (other than a youtube video) or explanation to back that claim. Those of us that have worked in the industry are interested in your "easy" way, please share it with us so we don't have to do things the hard way anymore.
Originally posted by D.Duck
Do you know what I have proven?
It takes about 5 minutes to insert a CGI 767 into a video if you have all the things pre prepared.
It takes 20 minutes if you start from scratch, no big deal, but you know all that because you are a professional.