It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phinubian
...while pandering to the hearts, minds and souls of Americans, there is no disrespect to that but it was a time when "Leave it to Beaver" Ruled, when the Ku Klux Klan really ruled visibly also invisibly and when everyone in the world was afraid of a cowboy and most assuredly blacks and other minorities had 0 stakes supporting or identifying with the conservative or republican idealogy because when one thought of or envisioned the epitome of the American Nuclear family or what may have been the example of being a conservative family, they resembled the majority of the wonderful family oriented shows out on television during the 50's and more recently they resemble the conservative movement in America, the majority devoid of any color.
Wow, what a load of garbage. Maybe the 50's were the golden years of America, but it had nothing to do with the KKK. If I'm deciphering your incoherent rant correctly, you seem to be bashing the ideal family. The breakdown of that ideal family unit you hate so much is perhaps the #1 reason this country is so screwed up.
When talking about the bad republicans we are not speaking about the Lincoln years because much is in question about that and what the reasons were, Rush your ideologies are akin to what you were raised with as values and the people you were around and unfortunately are a culmination of how the Republican party and the stereotype lived itself out in the most negative ways, unfortunately yourself and people like Anne Coulter sort of define conservatism as something tied to anglo values only sort of bordering on the NAZI ideal or diminish any other group that might not be about white, or white power did you not learn a lesson from the past election?
You seem to be implying that Rush (and Anne Coulter) is a racist. IF that is what you are saying, then you are either completely ignorant or are knowingly lying. Either way, it's false and you don't know what you are talking about. Bill Clinton once had to apologize to Rush for implying that he was racist. I'll bet you don't even have that much decency. Imagine that - your ethics are worse than Bubba.
What I am saying is Rush, you are a relic of the past, no longer relevant, the people your are touching nerves with and connecting with unfortunately, no disrespect are also in denial, but what else can they do, the multicultural, liberal melting pot that started to take its roots and beginnings in NYC and Ellis Island has come full circle, more of the nation is beginning to look like that, than Mayberry RFD.
LOL! Rush no longer relevant? Is that why 20 MILLION tune in every day to hear what he has to say?
I can't believe that at one time in the 90's I used to tune into your show, lets see, there was G Gordon Liddy, and you, my favorites in like 98-99 time period, also there was one other on WJFK here in DC, Howard Stern I think,but it seems something happened to you, it seems like the real you and the possible effects of all that drug use has gone to your head and you have possibly been affected by these drugs so much, I really believe that you are mentally ill and perhaps teetering on the insane.
No, Rush isn't the one that changed. You did. Rush is the same guy he was 20 years ago. That's why true conservatives love him, because whether it's good times or bad for conservatives, they can always count on Rush to be true to conservative principles. My guess is Rush isn't the one with a drug problem.
On one more note, IMHO politicians like Michael Steele need to get with it, he is being pimped and used to be the ultra magnetic magnate for blacks when there is absolutely no reason for anyone that is a minority to identify with in any way shape or form what the Republican party or with what true conservatism represents at any time.
Study your recent political history/science and the 60's southern Republicans and that might be what epitomizes the conservatism he preaches and what it really stands for, lets confine those reasons to the last 50 or so years, you will find some valuable ammunition to flood Mr. Steele with email to answer and also the ultra conservative talker, Rush or even the more extreme loonatic, Coulter.
One lie after another. Southern Republicans? You tell other people to study their history and then you want to slam "60's southern republicans"? You are kidding, right? You can't be this ignorant, can you? It was SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS that opposed racial equality. It was the REPUBLICANS that freed the slaves, and it was the REPUBLICANS that delivered them their equal rights. Maybe that's why MLK JR was a REPUBLICAN. Ever heard of Wallace that tried to block racial equality in the South? Democrat. Gore's father fought it - democrat. Clinton's mentor fought it - democrat. I could go on and on.
The point is, YOU are one trying to stir things up with outright lies made up out of thin air.
Originally posted by spearhead
so sorry to all you conservative pirates, taking more than you can swallow in ten life times. your pie is up. you can pretend you intend to give to the people. you'll only give what YOU want to give. someone now has the power to take it and it scares the poop out of you.
now its everyone else's PIE.
gobama!
I see your master has taught you well in the ways of envy, jealousy, and class warfare. "Pretend to give it to the people"? What kind of jibberish crap is that? Fact is, most wealthy people in this country EARNED their money by working hard, and most of them are very generous. Did you know that your master Obama wants the "rich" to give LESS to charity? He wants it ALL for himself, so HE can decide what to do with everyone else's money. Evidently, that's what you voted for and can't wait for it to happen. And people thought Bush was next Hitler? ROFL! He's got nothing on your master Obama.
Originally posted by daeoeste
I believe that some of these "conservative" pundits like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck are simply co-opting choice arguments from the populous rhetoric that has been stated for years by people like Alex Jones and Ron Paul. These guys are worried about losing listeners, especially since people are starting to "wake up" to the aforementioned peoples attempts at enlightening the public to the ideological fraud that is being a neoconservative. We must not forget that these guys (Rush and Beck) were espousing the policies of Delay and Bush when they were busy doubling the size of the federal govt. People are starting to be more suspicious, even Rush's listeners. I believe that this is because of the results of these failed policies affecting people negatively in all walks of life. The listeners remember, and I am sure that his ratings have gone down as people start to realize the difference between what was promised and what has been delivered by the people Rush has supported.
Originally posted by spearhead
it is because of complete dependency on big business in our countries that we are all screwed.
they now hold all the money we need
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
One of the great questions in life: why does anybody political extremism seriously?
Originally posted by LDragonFire
This is just a ploy by the PTB to keep us divided, Limbaugh wants to use history to prove liberal policies do not work. Yet our current situations was not caused by liberal policies. We currently have the largest Federal government in history, largest dept, eroded constitution a increase in our Empire needed to be funded at all of our expense.
Having the largest government in history IS LIBERAL, regardless of who was/is in office. This is why so many conservatives ripped Bush.
I'm past caring whether or not a policy is good or bad (morally), I'm only interested in results and if it works or not.
That's nonsense. So you want immoral policies if they work? LOL Doing the moral thing is always the right thing. This is what Rush was talking about. Standing on principles. I just love it when a liberal bashes Bush for "ignoring the Constitution" and then elect Obama and beg him "please steal money from somone else ("the rich") and give it to me!"
The "conservatives" had there chance to fix the USA and look at where we are.
Again, there's nothing conservative about a huge government. Who ran Congress for the past 2 years? The democrats. They PROMISED to slash the deficit if they got into power. Did they? LOL. Oh, but they didn't have the White House. That was the problem right? So now they have the White House and have they slashed the deficit? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Firing the GOP and putting democrats in power because you think the government is too big is a little like firing your police force and hiring the mob because their was too much crime and corruption.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
reply to post by Annee
Obama is the "Carnival Barker", not Rush. Your analogy is so backwards as to make it laughable. The "Carnival Barker" is one who gets your confidence, so you put your trust in him, but he ends up taking your money. Now, how much money has Rush Limbaugh taken from you? Not a penny is my guess. How much money is Obama going to steal from everyone he can with his smooth-talking con game?
Originally posted by alupang
Rush Limbaugh is paid over $25 million a year to convince you he and the Republican party are just "average 'mericans", and fools eat it up like candy.
Reagan runs up more debt than ALL the presidents before him, and Bush2 ran up more than all of HIS predecessors after being left $150 Billion surplus, and this fool wants to rant about "Liberals" running up the debt and creating "big government."
Got any bridges in Brooklyn you'd like to sell us, Lush?
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
One of the great questions in life: why does anybody political extremism seriously?
Huh? Are you asking why anyone takes it seriously? Good question. When you come up with an answer, you'll know how Obama won the election.
Originally posted by Afrosamurai
Wait a minute, smaller government? Less spending? Is he talking about the Bush Administration? They expanded government to a size never seen before. They spent more money then every president combined for the first 200+ years of this nations existence! Where was he when Bush was doing all this? Oh that's right getting caught at an airport with viagra after coming back from a nation known for child prostitution.