Why do I get the feeling that quite a few people don't read postings entirely or only pick a few words instead of entire statements and therefore
deliberately project a false picture?
Are they incapable of comprehending complete sentences? Why do quite a few people judge so quickly instead of sending a U2U or just ask if they
misunderstood something? Why is there so much ignorance in the first place?
If these people claim to "deny ignorance" and be "searchers of truth", I feel that they want to take the mickey out of others.
This was my rant. Greetings. Thanks. Over and out.
Usually what I will do, if a thread is like 37 pages, I will read the opening post and some after, then go to the end page and determine if the topic
has been derailed, if that is the case, I usually just don't post or, if I feel it is important enough, I reply to the opening post of the thread ,
hoping topic gets back on track.
lately i've been ending discussions by having the last post in alot of threads, by researching things and posting an explanation with proof to backup
usually my grammar and spehling r betr than this post
The real complaint I have is when I do rebut something and I take the time to research my answer, and I am right - if the thread continues, the
fanatics just ignore my post and refuse to acknowledge it because they have no way to win.
I don't post again in those threads, and I always check people's post histories when I am going to engage them - i've uncovered a few lazy hoaxers
and liars in the past.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.