It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Former UN Ambassador John Bolton believes the security of the United States is at dire risk under the Obama administration. And before a gathering of conservatives in Washington on Thursday morning, he suggested, as something of a joke, that President Barack Obama might learn a needed lesson if Chicago were destroyed by a nuclear bomb.
Originally posted by elston
I live in Chicago. I would love it if there was video of this. How could that come out of his mouth? Crowd responded with laughter? WTF
Originally posted by Wideawake08
This scares the Hell out of me, especially since this is coming after a report out of Indiana that FEMA was planning something really big for Chicago.
Serial Killers are running this country and they won't stop until we are all dead.
I live near Chicago and I hate the feeling everyday that it may be my last.
God Bless
www.motherjones.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
"The fact is on foreign policy I don't think President Obama thinks it's a priority," said Bolton. "He said during the campaign he thought Iran was a tiny threat. Tiny, tiny depending on how many nuclear weapons they are ultimately able to deliver on target. Its, uh, its tiny compared to the Soviet Union, but is the loss of one American city" – here Bolton shrugged his shoulders impishly – "pick one at random – Chicago – is that a tiny threat?"
Originally posted by Chadwickus
Originally posted by Wideawake08
This scares the Hell out of me, especially since this is coming after a report out of Indiana that FEMA was planning something really big for Chicago.
Serial Killers are running this country and they won't stop until we are all dead.
I live near Chicago and I hate the feeling everyday that it may be my last.
God Bless
www.motherjones.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
And what happens when you're all dead?
These power hungry elite are going to rule over what, Cockroaches?
Is it for the money?
What's the use for money when there's no one left to make or sell things?
Originally posted by Cuhail
I live north of Chicago (Lake County Represent!!!!) and I'll keep an eye out for the bright flash and boom. My computer desk is right next to a SW window.
I'll let ya know when I'm worried about it. (I'm not...yet.)
Cuhail
Originally posted by Aislin
reply to post by Wideawake08
"The fact is on foreign policy I don't think President Obama thinks it's a priority," said Bolton. "He said during the campaign he thought Iran was a tiny threat. Tiny, tiny depending on how many nuclear weapons they are ultimately able to deliver on target. Its, uh, its tiny compared to the Soviet Union, but is the loss of one American city" – here Bolton shrugged his shoulders impishly – "pick one at random – Chicago – is that a tiny threat?"
I don't think think that this statement is indicative of a false flag nuclear attack on Chicago. It is just Bolton thinking that he was being cute or clever. I can see him practicing this in front of the bathroom mirror.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
And what happens when you're all dead?
These power hungry elite are going to rule over what, Cockroaches?
Is it for the money?
What's the use for money when there's no one left to make or sell things?
John Robert Bolton, appointed August 1, 2005, as ambassador to the United Nations by President George W. Bush and was unable to "win" confirmation by the U.S. Senate, will "step down when his temporary appointment expires" in January 2007. [1]
In 2005, Bush "sidestepped" the Senate and "installed [the] embattled nominee ... ending a five-month impasse with Democrats who accused Bolton of abusing subordinates and twisting intelligence to fit his conservative ideology. 'This post is too important to leave vacant any longer, especially during a war and a vital debate about UN reform,' Bush said. He said Bolton had his complete confidence." [2]
"Mr. Bolton did not win the support of a majority of members of the Foreign Relations Committee, and the Senate refused to make a final decision on this nomination pending review of documents that the Administration declined to provide in blatant disregard for the Senate's constitutional rights and responsibilities."