It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnsky
Not so sure about the F-35's you proposed, their components weren't exactly intended for our hostile climate. It's likely we'd have to spend additional cash and time upgrading them before use in Canada.
As an analogy, never break the snow bank with a Ferrari, it's too expensive, and it won't survive it.
The EF2000 however can easily be fitted to work in hostile climates like Canada's north for extended periods.
That decision I'd back 100%.
As a rule of thumb, lets not attempt to use any of that plastic equipment the US has been coming out with lately. It's not battle ready.
Originally posted by johnsky
Not so sure about the F-35's you proposed, their components weren't exactly intended for our hostile climate. It's likely we'd have to spend additional cash and time upgrading them before use in Canada.
Originally posted by C0bzz
Originally posted by johnsky
Not so sure about the F-35's you proposed, their components weren't exactly intended for our hostile climate. It's likely we'd have to spend additional cash and time upgrading them before use in Canada.
As an analogy, never break the snow bank with a Ferrari, it's too expensive, and it won't survive it.
The EF2000 however can easily be fitted to work in hostile climates like Canada's north for extended periods.
That decision I'd back 100%.
As a rule of thumb, lets not attempt to use any of that plastic equipment the US has been coming out with lately. It's not battle ready.
F-35 has no problems in hostile climates - why would it? Why would the EF have no problems in them then? Plastic equipment, how? Also, getting the F-35 is much more than a 'proposal', Canada is a level 3 partner.
[edit on 28/2/2009 by C0bzz]
Originally posted by tristar
If im not mistaken there were some trial's held in the Northern Upper Hemisphere and apparently there some issues resulting from climate.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by tristar
If im not mistaken there were some trial's held in the Northern Upper Hemisphere and apparently there some issues resulting from climate.
Perhaps, but there are only 4 flying F-35 pre production aircraft, currently, and they have never left the Southern US States of Texas and California where limited flight testing is currently taking place. The only such trial I can think of is when the Raptor visited Eielson a couple of years ago for cold weather trials, which it passed with flying colors.
MOSCOW, February 27 (RIA Novosti) - A Russian government source expressed astonishment on Friday over a statement made by Canada's defense minister over a flight by a Russian strategic bomber near the Canadian border.
Peter Mackay said two Canadian fighters forced the Russian Tu-160 Blackjack to make a U-turn on February 18 as it neared Canadian airspace less then 24 hours before U.S. President Barack Obama was due to visit Ottawa. The Canadian minister said the move was "a strong coincidence."
"The Canadian defense minister's statements concerning the flights of our long-haul aircraft are totally unclear... This was a routine flight. The countries adjacent to the flight path had been notified and the planes did not violate the airspace of other countries. In this light the statements by the Canadian Defense Ministry provoke astonishment and can only be called a farce," the source said.
The Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, Col. Alexander Drobyshevsky, confirmed that all the neighboring states had received prior notification of the flights by Russian strategic aircraft.
Lt. Col. Vladimir Drik, a Russian Air Force spokesman, said earlier the Tu-160 flights were in compliance with international agreements and rules and did not violate Canadian airspace.
en.rian.ru...
Russia hits back at Canada about bomber flights
At a press conference Friday, Defence Minister Peter MacKay said the incident happened on Feb. 18.
"At no time did Russian airplanes enter Canadian airspace but within 24 hours of the president's visit here to Canada last week we did scramble two CF-18 fighter planes from Norad (North American Aerospace Defense Command) and Canada command," MacKay said.
The jets took off from Cold Lake, Alta., to intercept the aircraft, which has been reported as either a Tupolev Tu-95 bomber or its newer sister, the Tu-160.
"They met a Russian aircraft that was approaching Canadian airspace and, as they have done on previous occasions, they sent very clear signals that are understood that that aircraft was to turn around, turn tail, and head back to its own airspace -- which it did," MacKay said.
CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife said the plane was intercepted about 190 km northeast of Tuktoyaktuk, N.W.T.