Ron Paul Upsets CNBC, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 08:13 PM by David9176
reply to post by L.HAMILTON


Thanks for posting this OP.

GREAT VIDEO.

Star and Flag!

This man needs to be President. He seems to be the only one out there that gets it.


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 08:17 PM by David9176
reply to post by Tentickles


yeah...they were like...OH CRAP!!...the truth!!! Shut him up!!

Silly RP and his honest/logical observations.

What a fool he is.

I hope the guy is still ticking in 4 years...if things get as bad as they look he may be able to get by the media bias and get elected...he's up there in age though.



reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 10:10 PM by spacedoubt
reply to post by shortywarn


I got your point, and I agree with it.
If I'm not mistaken that was Paul's second statement. someone else had yielded some of their time To Dr. Paul.
Paul LOVES to go up against the Bernanke.


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 10:13 PM by David9176
reply to post by spacedoubt




Paul LOVES to go up against the Bernanke.


Yeah, he's done it many times...and he never gets a real answer. He always gets a political answer as Bernanke always dodges the question or does he trademark "screw you" smirk on his face.

I'd love to see Ron Paul locked up in a room alone with this guy along with a camera.

He'd eat him alive.


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 10:22 PM by spacedoubt
reply to post by David9176


someday, I wish Bernanke would just lose it, while Paul was giving him his weekly scolding. He seems to tune out half the time.


Back on the topic.
I just think that CNBC was off their timing, they thought It was going to be the "Fedmaster General" doing the talking. And There was Paul. notice that they cut away after he was finished.


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 10:45 PM by David9176
reply to post by spacedoubt




I just think that CNBC was off their timing, they thought It was going to be the "Fedmaster General" doing the talking. And There was Paul. notice that they cut away after he was finished.


RP seems like the parent scolding a kid for stealing cookies out of the cookie jar...and Bernanke just won't admit to it.

I think this is correct as well although I can see how it can be confused. I don't watch this show either so I wouldn't have known about the way the show is ran.

Thanks to the poster who originally pointed this out.


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 11:42 PM by shortywarn
Originally posted by spacedoubt
reply to post by shortywarn


I got your point, and I agree with it.
If I'm not mistaken that was Paul's second statement. someone else had yielded some of their time To Dr. Paul.
Paul LOVES to go up against the Bernanke.





thanks spaae doubt,,, at least somebody gets it,,,,,, 2 pages of swearing up one side and down the other they're out to get him ,,,, when that was so not the point is ridiculous to me,,,,,,,and i guess why this site and conspiracies in general get such a bad rap

people would rather yell, than see the truth


it seems crazy how many will just jump on something,,, with no knowledge or even verifying it to be true or not

someone posted it so it's true, end of story,,, geez


he's been on cnbc a bunch lately,,,,,invited,,,, yet today they cut him off because he was telling the truth

i guess he was lying the times he was invited


also----spacedoubt

i still remember that thread last year you were moderating during the primaries,, she was nuts,,, and you were funny,,, i'm chuckling thinking about it ,,, she hated ron paul something awful


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 11:50 PM by spacedoubt
reply to post by shortywarn


I'm going to have to go dig up that thread later.
I can't remember who the member was though..



reply posted on 28-2-2009 @ 12:18 AM by gravytrain
reply to post by shortywarn


Your absolutely right nothing out of the ordinary here. They screw up on the timing all the time it just so happend that this time ron paul was speaking and they wanted to start the live feed as soon as Bernanke started his speech and started it too early.


reply posted on 28-2-2009 @ 02:37 PM by Paul3
reply to post by shortywarn


You are missing the point. They messed up by showing Ron Paul telling the truth. They knew there was going be H to pay for it. Thats why they were trying cover for it. Watch the last of the vid again.


reply posted on 2-3-2009 @ 12:36 AM by shortywarn
Originally posted by Paul3
reply to post by shortywarn


You are missing the point. They messed up by showing Ron Paul telling the truth. They knew there was going be H to pay for it. Thats why they were trying cover for it. Watch the last of the vid again.


if that's so,,, why has ron paul been on a ton of msm outlets lately,,,,saying nearly the saME SPEAL EVERYTIME?????


why would cnbc have him on ,,,,,if he would tell the truth,,, that they're covering up

it doesn't hold weight or make sense


and i'm not denying msm is biased and steers things in a direction they want,,, but not this one


also,,, why didn't they just cut him off,, they aired it until he finished his 2minute opening statement,,,,

sorry,, but no
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^