Elongated skulls discovered in Russia, Jan. 2009, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 10:07 AM by CoolBlackHole
Originally posted by Goathief
Accordingly, wiki.bmezine.com... is a disinformation website/page, conceived and paid by guess whom.

“... BMEzine is ... the world's biggest body modification website and almost certainly know a hell of a lot more than anyone else on the planet on such matters due to it's user base being closely tied to tribal living and scholars of the field. In fact they are probably more anti-establishment/NWO than this very website…"

As you can see, I wrote “….disinformation website/page”, which was meant as: “website respectively page”. But ok, I agree, I should have only mentioned “page”, not “website”. Edited. My intention was only to post about the PAGE not the site.

But that doesn’t change a thing about the fact that story stated on the page wiki.bmezine.com... is pure nonsense.

"Are you honestly suggesting photos, documented histories of different types of cranial binding from all over the globe and living persons who have undergone it are completely fabricated? If you are then you are only lying to yourself so your fantasies can be realised."

Now listen cutebuddy:
1. I am not only suggesting it, but I have thoroughly substantiated WHY that “skull binding” story is a complete nonense (e.g. just one reason of many: “… consequently neither modern nor ancient records depicting the (required) "binding" of children’s skulls have shown up.”). While you substantiated nothing. Can’t you read? Try reasoning.
2. If you cannot provide argument, then don’t just accuse others of “lying”. That's 1-bit pre-teen behaviour. How old are you? Six, seven?
3. You shouldn’t talk about others’ “fantasies” while believing yourself in that “skull binding” nonsense. As I wrote the skull binding story is so daft they even deleted the Wikipedia entry.

..perhaps you are a disinfo agent yourself?

Sure I am, cutebuddy. Every month I get paychecks from Jordan Maxwell, Zechariah Sitchin and David Icke. For promoting their books.

I believe it's quite possible that human/extra-terrestrial contact has been made but cranial binding of this nature is not evidence of such, not even close.

You’re right, “cranial binding” doesn’t produce evidence for anything, because it doesn’t exist and never existed.

[edit on 27-2-2009 by CoolBlackHole]


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 10:59 AM by Goathief
reply to post by CoolBlackHole


What do you mean, if I cannot provide argument? You are the one making bold and fantastical claims with no evidence to back them up whatsoever and getting very defensive/aggressive when proven to be wrong.

Here is the Wiki entry you keep claiming does not exist any more due to it being untruthful and forcibly removed: en.wikipedia.org...



Some further reading for you:
www.clas.ufl.edu...

www.artificialcranialdeformation.info...

Just put it in google, there's books worth of written records, paintings, photographs, archaeological findings, etc. Where's yours? You have thoroughly substantiated nothing, except perhaps your delusions and denial of evidence. I stand by my original statement.

Did you even read the BBC news article on Pakistani rat children used for begging I posted earlier?


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 11:18 AM by CoolBlackHole
Originally posted by Jimbowsk
So I gather the Tuanacen tribe of Bolivia that actively practiced head binding to create an elongated skull and trephination (removing sections of the skull to eliviate pressure) which date back nearly 9000 years is made up as well? Of course what do historians and archeaologists know eh?


Sure, the Tuanacen tribe of Bolivia…. You forgot the Zapicotls tribe in Columbia, the Zariustra tribe in Brasil, the Broselbotz Tribe in West India and the Tubitutu tribe in Indonesia....

1. They’re all having great fun torturing their children by binding and compressing their skulls. But ….“unfortunately” there’s not the slightest evidence nor any record of children actually being treated like that …. Hmmmm. Strange. Talk about evidence.

Those two "probably photoshopped" skulls on page 1 are obviously modern(!) skulls, so if there actually were modern tribes practicing such then there would of course be photos of children enjoying this treatment. But there isn't even one such picture in the whole world. So there isn't any - real convincing - "evidence" for the skull binding story.

Neither there are any records actually depicting ancient skull binding rites.

2. Moreover, I repeat, even if such strange “skull binding” rites existed or had existed, they could obviously NEVER produce those wide ancient skulls, which we’re actually talking about.

[edit on 27-2-2009 by CoolBlackHole]


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 12:38 PM by HunkaHunka
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
Originally posted by Jimbowsk
Plenty of info on t'net about skull binding and the elongation of skulls from infancy.

Here ya go, linky for ya...

Cranial Binding


As to the alleged aboriginal “bound” skulls. These stories of aboriginal “cranial binding” are basically made up fairy tales to conceal the hidden human-alien connection issue.


Uhmm.. he showed pictures of adults... this is done today man.


reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 12:39 PM by Kandinsky
I posted this several weeks ago on another thread and don't think anyone noticedHere it is again. The article contains scientific data backed up with references and evidence of elongated skulls being artificial. No elements of lost civilizations or aliens. Just good old fashioned human ingenuity. The focus is on Iranian skulls, but reference is made to both Africa and South America.

Cranial modification is caused during infancy through the shaping of a baby’s head whilst it is still malleable. Such shaping can be caused by both intentional and unintentional means, using objects such as bandages or textiles, wooden boards, or even simply massaging the head, causing either a flattening or elongation of the human skull (Dingwall, pp. 12-13; Brofin, p. 191; Molleson, pers. comm.).

The prehistoric Iranian examples known so far all result from such ante mortem modification of the skull, as is also the case with many other examples recovered from throughout the Near East (Arensburg and Hershkovitz, 1988; Idem, 1989; Molleson and Campbell; Meiklejohn et al.; Özbek; Senyurek and Tunakan; Fletcher et al.; Daems and Croucher). Cranial modification is one of the most obvious examples we have from the archaeological record of the active manipulation of the body during life, demonstrating choices to treat the body in particular ways, with implications in terms of the reflection of identity and identity construction
Prehistory of Iran-Artificial Cranial Modification

It's very academic but worth reading to gain the understanding that 'scientists' aren't all making stuff up.



reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 12:41 PM by CoolBlackHole
Originally posted by Goathief
"What do you mean, if I cannot provide argument? ..."


btw I said they deleted the Wikipedia “skull binding” entry, which was correct.

1. You're dodging. The substantiated arguments are on page 1 of this thread, third last post. They prove that the “skull binding” theory is a nonsense. If you want to seriously discuss, then tie on there.

a) Any REAL “skull binding” would be much too painful, a torture.

b) Skull binding would have to be practiced on children. But, besides the evident pain issue, there is not the slightest evidence nor any record of children being treated like that. Neither in ancient nor modern records. There isn't even one picture in the whole world of such a child treatment. What we often see depicted on those disinformation pages (see 2. below), are children with special hats or like, which certainly isn't "skull binding".

b) And, again, even if such strange “skull binding” rites existed or had existed, they could obviously NEVER produce those wide ancient skulls, which we’re actually talking about, like the one shown in the OP video or the famous Nofretete’s (see page 1). You could NEVER generate such “full girth" ‘conehead’ skulls by any “binding” method. Bindings/constrictions could - if at all - at most bring forth NARROWER skull parts, but not those 'wide' skull shapes.


2. I already mentioned there are HUGE disinformation efforts by you know exactly whom, TPTB. For instance Wikipedia is a fantastic website, but has a while ago begun to provide distorted/false information regarding many politically “hot” issues. Sorry, but I have to break that to you. The same goes for some other pages like e.g. www.clas.ufl.edu... i.e. a webpage conceived to deliberately provide disinformation. And most probably also for that funny book www.artificialcranialdeformation.info... NOW EXCUSE ME, BUT THIS IS HOW MODERN PROFESSIONAL DISINFORMATION WORKS!!! Build a website or other 'evidence' providing disinformation and distorted facts, then “refer” to it.

Even tons of disinformation cannot divert from from the real facts which are 1a/b/c above.

[edit on 27-2-2009 by CoolBlackHole]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 8 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 16 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 6 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags