Elongated skulls discovered in Russia, Jan. 2009, page 1

video.yahoo.com...

Scientists discovered some very strange elongated skulls. They say that similar skulls have been found in other regions of the world.

What would be interesting to know is: were they elongated as part of some genetic deformity or were they intentionally elongated during childhood development?
Could they be a hybrid of human with some other race that is yet to be discovered?

What do you think?

reply to post by haika

---

Nice find Haika that was interesting.

reply to post by prevenge

---

I've seen the starchild skull a couple of times on TV. I honestly think that it came from a physically deformed child, not an alien hybrid of any kind.

It is some interesting stuff there are also some interesting skulls etc on the link below.

burlingtonnews.net...

Originally posted by haika
reply to post by prevenge

---

I've seen the starchild skull a couple of times on TV. I honestly think that it came from a physically deformed child, not an alien hybrid of any kind.

That's quite a short conclusion you've made.
Have you researched all of the evidence presented by the procurers?
www.starchildproject.com...

they're also doing some extensive tests who's results will be shown soon..
(not to make this a starchild skull discussion thread
just offering some extra info.)

-

Originally posted by haika
reply to post by prevenge

I've seen the starchild skull a couple of times on TV. I honestly think that it came from a physically deformed child, not an alien hybrid of any kind.

I hate to break the incredible news to you, but: Don't believe everything they tell you on TV. I assume you're deeply surprised now.

The OP video is not about the so called "starchild skull", but about one of the famous "conehead" skulls ATS thread "Conehead Skulls". Secondly the "deformed child" nonsense, excuse me, is one more of the many cover up lies, guess by whom, to permanently hide away the secret human-alien connections. Here's the truth:



And here:
T H E S T A R C H I L D P R O J E C T


[edit on 27-2-2009 by CoolBlackHole]

Plenty of info on t'net about skull binding and the elongation of skulls from infancy.

Here ya go, linky for ya...

Cranial Binding

It's clearly cranial binding, for the person who asked for photographs of the results:

There's lots of similar things going on in the world today, here's an example which uses rings:

Pakistani Rat Children

Originally posted by Jimbowsk
Plenty of info on t'net about skull binding and the elongation of skulls from infancy.

Here ya go, linky for ya...

Cranial Binding

As to the alleged aboriginal “bound” skulls. These stories of aboriginal “cranial binding” are basically made up fairy tales to conceal the hidden human-alien connection issue. Accordingly, wiki.bmezine.com... is a disinformation webpage, conceived and paid by guess whom. As to the story being not authentic they even deleted the "cranial binding" entry on Wikipedia.

a) On wiki.bmezine.com... they’re talking about “binding … or strapping” baby skulls “...against boards”. What a complete idiocy to assume baby skulls were strapped to “boards”. That would be sheer torture. Moreover the strapping would in a short time squash the skin, cause bruises, inflammations, etc. And it would have to be implemented over many years. And all that torture for what purpose? Aboriginals aren’t insane, and they weren’t in ancient time either.

Also a mere "binding" would actually be torture. Ever suffered from a real tight wound bandage for only a few hours...? Let alone a head bandage which would have to be even much tighter in order to constrict/deform the bone, and would have to be worn for many years. Forget it.

b) There might be one or two cases of some exceptional 'wacky' skull binding in the whole world. The two pictures in the post above might be such cases - if at all, as I suspect they were carefully photoshopped to make them look "elongated".

Even if the two pictures had not been altered, they'd only prove that a “binding”/constriction would - if at all - at the utmost produce a pathetic looking, partially 'elongated' and NARROWED part of a skull. But never a “full girth" ‘conehead’ skull like the famous Nofretete’s (below) or like the one shown in the OP video. Bindings/constrictions could only cause that pathetic NARROWING and never, never those 'wide' skull shapes.



c) As the “skull binding” theory is a unrealistic, consequently neither modern nor ancient records depicting the (required) "binding" of CHILDREN'S skulls have shown up.

[edit on 27-2-2009 by CoolBlackHole]

Ancient Walled City, Older than Egypt\'s Pyramids, Unearthed off US Georgia Coast
  Posted 14 days ago with 102 member flags

Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 9 days ago with 96 member flags

12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags

The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 17 days ago with 70 member flags

Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 6 days ago with 45 member flags

Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags

42,000-year-old paintings : \'The oldest work of art ever\' discovered
  Posted 5 days ago with 26 member flags

R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 13 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: