Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
To answer this, you need a key. A data base, of all the abductees. In this data base would contain the place, date, and time of each event. You
would have the race, ethnicity and country of origin. You would also have any religious affiliation. All the statistics. That would answer the
That cannot and will not happen, so is rather moot to think about.
Number 2. You don't know that important, influential people have not been "Abducted". The probabilities are greater, that they have, been
Not sure how this relates, but there is no evidence to suggest notoriety is related or unrelated to abduction, especially since much happens when
young even as children, and most people don't become famous or powerful until adulthood.
Number 3. Why play games? Why hide in the shadows and "Steal" that which does not belong to them. That is the hard one.
I've only an opinion, everybody's got one, worth what you pay for it probably, but stemming from a variety of experience.
1. I think there is some degree of 'interdimensional' going on here.
2. I think the mass belief systems of humanity may literally have some obscure physics thing to do with what frequencies are perceived as a normal
part of 'reality' for our species.
3. I think the more we en masse 'believe' in them, the greater a role they are able to employ here (via #2 above), and they want that.
4. I believe they lack legal permission in their own framework for contacting us openly at all let alone en masse. So they have to stay under the
radar officially. Additionally, I believe different small groups of them have agreements or relationships (sometimes for worse as well as better) with
different governments of the world, which for the moment at least, preclude open or trackable contact.
5. They choose for their official means of secrecy, some approach to memory that is surmountable or recoverable by some % of the population, but by
innate means. So they can legally say they followed the steps to remain private but it's not their fault some tiny % remembers anyway. Even many who
don't consciously remember obtain an inexplicable fascination with the subject borne of the repressed memory. Both of these contribute to a growing
cultural archetype and feeds into #s 2-3 above.
6. I think the great majority of abduction happens in a state of bilocation. Most people aren't familiar with the term; it is the alleged state some
saints have been in when seemingly present at more than one location at the same time. The human body is vibrating energy. Essentially it amounts to
entrapping a portion of that energy technologically, which results in the body being manifest in more than one place at a time: left with minimal
psyche on autopilot 'here' usually while sleeping, the rest beamed elsewhere for interaction. Most the population won't remember anything that
happens in that state, our culture is so foreign to the whole concept nobody even talks of it--I've never seen this concept online for example though
it's the primary awareness I had during my own experiences, but my 'awareness' was pretty well developed for other reasons just by coincidence.
Useful side-effect include: The people here won't understand how they can wake up suddenly un-pregnant or with implants when there is no evidence
their body was not in bed through the night. And I feel that often when abductees have felt their mate was asleep and unnaturally oblivious to it all,
that their mate was simply already bilocated.
As for motives, different identities that I perceive look different, seemed to have different activities and so I assume different motives. Unless
those motives impact the relatively near future of humankind, it probably doesn't really matter. We are culturally geared to ignorance of the method,
scorn of any 'serious' account, insufficient science to help us, and a whole branch of authority (psychiatry) that can chemically lobotomize any
offbeat threats. With those things in place there isn't much we can do about it either way, so why fret.