There Was No Missile At the Pentagon - But the Plane Did Not Hit, page 2

Originally posted by TruthMagnet
Craig Ranke CIT,

Now I have been reading a lot of your research - and I feel it is quite professional - but some things you seem to be unfairly dismissing.

1) Cab Driver hit by a light pole claims he saw the aircraft go overhead I believe (didn't he?) - he did not mention seeing any explosion causing the pole to fall.

Hi TM,

We most certainly have not "dismissed" the cab driver Lloyde England.

In fact I have spent many hours with the man in person. We interviewed him in 2006 but I re-interviewed him again in 2008 and we even took a road trip together to physically examine the actual cab that he had preserved on his property in the country about an hour and a half from his house in Arlington.

The entire experience is available for everyone to view for free here.

Please do and feel free to discuss the issue at length in that thread.

However I don't know where you get the notion that the poles were felled by explosives. We have never claimed such a thing and the evidence proves that this did not happen as I explain in detail in this thread.

But more importantly we have demonstrated how not a single witness has been confirmed to have seen the plane hit the light poles at all as outlined in this thread.

Feel free to bump any of these threads if you wish to discuss these separate topics further as this thread is about the fact that there is no evidence for a missile.

Thanks!

2) Wasn't an engine part clearly visible near the hole in the Pentagon - while it has been theorized that this was not a 757 engine part - surely you are not suggesting this had been planted there?

As most people know there were no large sections of aircraft outside of the building and this fact is what got many questioning the event to begin with.

But since we know the plane was on the north side and could not have hit the building we most certainly DO suggest that what few photographed (yet unidentified) parts that were there had to have been planted. And yes that includes this relatively tiny rotor:

As well as these relatively small scraps:

Not a big deal really especially in all the chaos.

Did you know that minutes after local first-responders arrived there was an order to frantically evacuate everyone from the area INCLUDING the fire-firefighters because of reports of another plane coming in?

Could this be when the few scrap parts outside of the building were planted?

Sure but it could have easily happened a number of other ways as well and we know that it DID happen because all of the witnesses saw the plane on the north side.

I am still finding the Pilots for 9/11 truth theory that a drone missle was dropped right before the Pentagon flyby to be more compelling - because it could have clipped the poles AND left the engine part satisfying these two conditions.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth NEVER stated that theory nor do they state any theory at all so I'm not sure where you get that one. You won't be able to provide a quote from the organization making this claim anywhere.

And there is no evidence for such a scenario.

Everyone only saw one plane on the north side of the citgo.

And it seems like that could have happened quick enough to not be intelligently witnessed by even fairly close - but untrained - observers.

We have an interview with Air Traffic Controller Sean Boger who was in the heliport tower as you can view in this thread.

He is not an "untrained observer".

Naturally he had an amazing view from the tower right next to the alleged impact point and he only saw one plane on the north side like everyone else and he did not see anything launch a drone or a missile.

Nobody did because this did not happen.