It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by HiAliens
Sorry, you fail miserably. An article is a long way, a very long way, from a peer-reviewed scientific study. Heck, I can write an article.
Try again.
4. The UK has free dental service, there should be no need to have to put floride in the water to improve on teeth.
It's not actually free. Do you think that dentists don't get any money for their work? The money is paid by the government, coming out of your taxes. The addition of fluoride is meant to reduce the cost of dentistry by reducing cavities and generally making teeth stronger. Now that is proven.
[edit on 27-2-2009 by TheComte]
[edit on 27-2-2009 by TheComte]
Originally posted by defcon2
Hi! I was just wondering if anyone has any info as to which other areas in Britain already have fluoridated water?(I can't seem to find anything).Also I think it is pretty outrageous that around 70% voted against getting this put into their water supply,so much for Democracy!!!
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
And please don't believe that they're doing this in the best interests of the people. They don't care about the people.
[edit on 26/2/09 by NuclearPaul]
Originally posted by corvin77
I havent read the whole blog, so hope this hasn't been covered yet. My question is this: if the water supply is being fluoridated, and no consumption takes place, does your skin still absorb fluoride when bathing in it?
If so, are there any references to research on this?
Is fluoridation ethical? Many opponents of fluoridation consider the right of individuals to choose their own medications to be the primary reason for opposition. Is it acceptable for either a minority, or a majority, to forcibly expose everyone in a community to a chemical which may have benefits for some but, risks for all? A person with no teeth has risks with absolutely no benefits. Some individuals who are very sensitive to fluoride are placed at very high risk. Some of us drink a great deal more water than others. Meanwhile, there have been no long-term studies to evaluate the effects of fluoride accumulation in the body over many decades. It is impossible to completely avoid fluoride in a fluoridated community. Many cannot afford the expense, time, and/or effort required to avoid fluoridated water. Even if we manage to use only distilled water for drinking and cooking, we will still absorb some fluoride through bathing. (Fluoridation: A Violation of Medical Ethics and Human Rights)
Originally posted by corvin77
reply to post by spinkyboo
Thanks spinkyboo
Seems it is everywhere, just did some reading and apparantly it is in cigarettes, alot of medication, like annti depressants.
I checked my medication and guess what, it is one of the ingredients.
So try as we may, avoiding it would be one tough job, if not impossible!
Originally posted by FredT
reply to post by HiAliens
While I realize its just not as prestegious as "Prison Planet" in terms of serious medical research perhaps you can, as noted before, please point out peer reviewed research showing and validity or statitical evidence of ANY of your theories using say pubmed or any ACTUAL research article.
Originally posted by FredT
Man if you guys get flouride in your water, your going to take away the best dig we have. the whole bad teeth thing
On a serious note, think of the improved dental health for the children. many wather systems esp those with wells have natural levels of flouride that exceed US Federal standards for adding it in.
"...improved dental health" is an unproven allegation. I don't get the second sentence at all.
My evidence? The city of Palo Alto was one fo the the first to benifit from a fluorinated water supply and what do I have to show for it 39 years later? Yep never had a cavity.
That's not evidence--it's argument by anecdote. I grew up in fluoridated Chicago. Result: 16 fillings. Cancel.
The flouride issue seems to draw the same type of hysetrical crowd as the anti vaccine crowd. Long on indignation and self richeous blather but short on facts
At least us hysterical, indignant, and self-righteous blatherers can spell "fluoride". Typical lame ad hominem--the counterfeit of argument. Shooting blanks now? No sense in presenting facts when the "true believers" refuse to look through the telescope.
[edit on 2/28/09 by FredT]
Originally posted by RaptureMe2
It's one of the great PR scams of the last half-century that this garbage is promoted by your friendly neighborhood dentist when the fact is that non-fluoridated countries have equal of better dental health than the english-speaking countries that utilize it.
There are fully fluoridated cities in the U.S. that have terrible tooth decay issues [of course the authorities never connect the obvious dots--only talk about lack of funding for dental care]
Go back to school, Perfessor. The fluorine ion is just about the most chemically reactive ion on the planet. It forms bonds very quickly. It is the chemical bully of the block. It loves to bind to calcium and ACCUMULATES in the body. It is between lead and arsenic in terms of toxicity. SMALL amounts of fluoride are deadly. Fluoride disrupts enzyme activity and is used by scientists specifically for that purpose.
Fluoride loves cartilagenous tissue like joints and the pineal gland [gee . . . isn't that a gland in the brain?]. It doesn't flush out of the body any more than lead or mercury do. Fluoride baths have been used clinically to lower the thyroid activity of patients suffering for overactive thyroid. Guess what drug is one of the most commonly prescribed in the U.S.? Synthroid--a drug taken to STIMULATE thyroid activity! Hmmm . . . anyone connecting the dots out there?