It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The SUSPENSION of illicit drugs/mind altering substance topics on ATS (The experiment failed)

page: 59
42
<< 56  57  58    60  61  62 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by nyk537
 


Sorry, I think my endorsement blew it for you.....



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Seems fair to me.




posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by americandingbat
One way to avoid having too many people in a tie would be to limit the number of votes we each get to 3 or 4 instead of 6; then, the top person could be the DISC "leader" and could be responsible for picking between any ties.



I really like this idea proposed by ADB... 3 or 4 votes for the people you sincerely believe will do the best job at representation... Top number of votes, breaks the ties and is team leader...

Sounds reasonable...?

- Carrot



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


I am liking that idea.




posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Count me in BH - we need to get moving on this otherwise we'll just keep going around in circles.

For all our good intentions, we now need to achieve something, even if it is just the first step.



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by budski
 


I was all for Admin choosing from the list of nominees, but some didn't like that idea. So, let's see what BH comes up with.


I also think that would have been best.

And though I don't see a problem with voting for people whom we think are worth of DISC membership, I am against voting for people to be stricken off the list. We want to keep this process positive.



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Oh jesus, did ii just get nominated Again?



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Okay. Sounds Good.

Thanks for being so organized BH



- Carrot



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


it sounds arbitrary



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Shesh oh pete this thread is moving fast.



[edit on 2/26/2009 by whatukno]



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


So are we in agreement with the suggestion brought forth by BH then?



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by whatukno
 


LOL much happens when you post long



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Sounds good!



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Yes, you are nominated, darcon.
If you don't want the job, should you get chosen, you don't have to take it.


I'm doing the U2U.



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Then it is agreed upon, that BH's Suggestion is final?



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by schrodingers dog

Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by budski
 


I was all for Admin choosing from the list of nominees, but some didn't like that idea. So, let's see what BH comes up with.


I also think that would have been best.


As much as anything else, I think the problem was that SO made it pretty clear that it was up to us without staff intervention.

And Darcon, yes I believe you did. But as the nominator said, just read through this thread to see why



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by darcon
 


Looks like it.




posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


Thanks, im fine with it, i probably won't get the votes but i just wish you could be nominated.



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by darcon
 


Yes, and we don't get to vote for ourselves.







 
42
<< 56  57  58    60  61  62 >>

log in

join