The SUSPENSION of illicit drugs/mind altering substance topics on ATS (The experiment failed), page 39
Pages: <<  36    37    38    39    40    41    42  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 06:48 PM by blupblup
reply to post by intrepid



Can't you temporarily close it til you catch up... would be easier.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 06:48 PM by darcon
reply to post by intrepid



Thread should be closed temporarily, give members time to breath.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 06:51 PM by blupblup
reply to post by intrepid



Fair enough.

But everything has been discussed....a new thread is being drawn up as an overview/summary of this thread.
A voting thread has been drafted....

people can still read this thread if it's closed... so i think it would be easier if it was temporarily closed. JMO.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 06:53 PM by skeptic1
reply to post by darcon



Can you update the list please so that I can incorporate it in my summary??


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 06:56 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by AllTiedTogether



I've said like nine times that I think people should be allowed to talk about it on here. If you don't believe me, go back into the thread and look. I'm not indifferent, they have a right to discuss it, in all areas of the website where it's acceptable. Medical issues in Medical, hemp for textiles and fuel in Science and Economy, and recreational or currently illegal use to get high in the new "War on Drugs" forum with or without the personal stories thing, but I don't think personal experiences with having hallucinations or getting addicted or whatever is a good thing. Talking about it's spiritual benefits and the criminalization of it is fine.

[edit on 2/25/2009 by ravenshadow13]



reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 06:58 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by darcon



Yeah, a lot of these people haven't accepted nomination. I think we need a staff member to contact them and ask, perhaps direct them to this thread?


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 07:00 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by craig732



Here:

"Shortly after our failed experiment began, we noticed an increase in the number of people who seek only disruption, use insults and immature, snide remarks when interacting their fellow members.

It is sadly no coincidence that the number of complaints, and even threads in this forum, about incivility and immaturity rose in number while our failed experiment ran its course. The data shows these topics attract a type of user that is simply not wanted here and detracts from the thousands of interesting and important discussions that happen here everyday. "

Post 1 by Springer
Pages: <<  36    37    38    39    40    41    42  >>    ^^TOP^^