It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by C0bzz
If the pilot is pushed because of company policy, it's hardly the pilot's error.
but until the accident investigation has cut the cockpit apart (from all accounts its not accessible) i think we are just guessing
Originally posted by solidshot
Wondering what happened to the pilots that were killed? the area of the cockpit that they were sat in looked fairly intact and yet they were killed
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by FredT
FredT....if you're asking about fire suppression "inerting" systems....no. (At least, not the ones I flew, here in the USA)
I think that tech is still in development....
For others....fuel exhaustion is WILD speculation. ANY pilot finding himself in a critical fuel situation would declare 'minimum fuel' to ATC and receive priority handling.
To imagine any flight crew accepting, at dispatch, a fuel load with inadequate reserves....well, it's difficult to comprehend.
Still, too early to speculate....we had trouble for a while with the R/R engines on the 757s....the 'flight idle' setting was too low, and sometimes an engine would 'roll back' when at idle, simulating a power loss. (When slats/flaps are extended, the Flight Idle circuitry increases idle speed automatically....our 'roll-backs' occured at altitude, during idle descents, clean config....so, they changed the idle speed.
I went off-track....the Turkish airplane had gear down, slats and flaps...this is certainly going to be an interesting case to watch.
26 February 2009 | 15:53 | FOCUS News Agency Amsterdam. There are seven different versions released about the crash of Turkish airline Boeing 737 800 at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, NTV television channel informed. Air accident specialists have recovered the plane's black box flight recorder - the challenge now will be to identify what caused the catastrophe. The black box of the plane has been sent to Paris. The seven versions for the crash are as follows:
according to the first one it was a pilot’s error. However that version was immediately rejected by close to the pilot people who said that he has been on of the best pilots from the civic aviation of Turkey.
According to the second version the accident occurred due to an error of the second pilot who has been made training flight.
According to the third version the left engine of the plane has fell about some 2km before reaching the landing strip.
Fourth version announced that the two engines of the plain have suddenly stopped and forced the plane to land.
Fifth version is about a bird that blocked one of the engines, the
six possible cause is insufficient fuel and the
seventh one is turbulence.
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by C0bzz
If the pilot is pushed because of company policy, it's hardly the pilot's error.
Originally posted by Ivar_Karlsen
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by C0bzz
If the pilot is pushed because of company policy, it's hardly the pilot's error.
Any captain that let his/hers company push them to upload less than a safe amount of fuel for a given trip is in error, and probably shouldn't be on the flightdeck of any commercial airliner at all.
Originally posted by johnsky
Some have suggested the manufacturers don't care enough about public safety, some have suggested it's the airlines safety requirements...
I find it's rarely the requirements, they're quite strict, and pretty high... it's usually somewhere in the chain of command that things fall apart.
And the manufacturers tend to do a very good job, otherwise they lose the contract.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
For example, droppable engines on long haul, transoceanic flights;
overhead baggage compartments that don't open upon impact and smash peoples' heads;
a semi water-tight fuselage that doesn't sink within 10-15 minutes in deep water;
*Longitudinal Emergency Control System* using thrust modulation in the case of a hyrdaulic failure;
Engine failure may have been a factor in Wednesday's crash of a Turkish Airlines plane at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, the chief investigator says. Pieter van Vollenhoven told Dutch state television that the way the aircraft fell directly from the sky suggested that its engines might have stalled.
Originally posted by apex
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
For example, droppable engines on long haul, transoceanic flights;
OK, I am far from an expert in the field, but I can't see how this can possibly help anything. Detachable engines? How exactly could that work? If you detach an engine, that would really unbalance an aircraft, even a four engined one. While a non functioning engine means the Horizontal Stabilizer must be used to trim the aircraft, to just drop an engine off would need a lot of detailed calculation to balance the forces with the ailerons to get it balanced again.
Unless that isn't what you mean of course.
Originally posted by apex
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
overhead baggage compartments that don't open upon impact and smash peoples' heads;
Hmm, I thought that only happened in the movies....
Originally posted by apex
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
a semi water-tight fuselage that doesn't sink within 10-15 minutes in deep water;
A difficult task of engineering, it isn't expected to land in water usually, and I only know of one incident where the fuselage stayed in one piece since flying boats where used everywhere as airliners (I do of course, refer to the incident in the Hudson River).
Originally posted by apex
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
*Longitudinal Emergency Control System* using thrust modulation in the case of a hyrdaulic failure;
The chances are minuscule of that happening, 3 incidents since the dawn of jetliners, 1 of which was terrorist activity, 1 of which was a really bad repair job a few years earlier, and the other had a tiny almost completely undetectable crack in the engine (I think to detect it would have required complete engine dismantling).
And nowadays they use less hydraulic systems anyway. Electricity gives far better power per unit of weight for a system.
The Turkish Airlines plane which crashed into a field near Amsterdam's Schiphol airport had had repairs for a system malfunction two days earlier. The Boeing 737-800 was briefly taken out of operation on Monday after the pilot reported a problem with the Master Caution Light, the airline said.
When attempting an emergency landing at sea the engines usually scope up water causing tremendous drag and as a result tearing the fuselage apart.
Yes a substantial amount of trimming would be needed but the auto-pilot/on board computer would take care of that provided it has enough time to make the adjustments.
Usually we must lose a few hundred lives before the faa starts to consider tougher regulations. Thats quite unfortunate!
Perhaps a fuel guage malfunctioned giving the pilots a bad reading?
Not that I am an expert but it seems *system automation* is becoming more of a headache than a comfortable solution. Sometimes its better to keep things simple and fly the plane hands-on!
Any captain that let his/hers company push them to upload less than a safe amount of fuel for a given trip is in error, and probably shouldn't be on the flightdeck of any commercial airliner at all.
The company does'nt "coerce" pilots to do certain things, rather it obligates them to follow company policies. If you disobey you will lose your job!
For example, droppable engines on long haul,
stronger seats with deployable airbags for each and every passenger;
fewer passenger seats which translates to better spacing;
a semi water-tight fuselage that doesn't sink within 10-15 minutes in deep water;
*Longitudinal Emergency Control System* using thrust modulation in the case of a hyraulic failure; etc....
The terrible reality of an airplane tragedy hit home for Boeing workers Friday as the company acknowledged that three of its employees had died in the crash of a Turkish Airlines 737-800 jet in Amsterdam on Wednesday.
Four Seattle-area engineers working for Boeing's defense division were traveling on Flight TK1951 from Istanbul, Turkey, where they had been supporting a defense program based on a military version of the 737.
A fourth employee, [...], was seriously injured and is in the hospital. He is expected to recover.
Boeing confirmed Thursday that all four men worked for Integrated Defense Systems[...].
All four worked on the Boeing AEW&C, the Airborne Early Warning and Control System, also known as Wedgetail, based on the Boeing 737s. Turkey calls its system the Peace Eagle after purchasing these high-tech military planes. All four were returning from that country after helping the Turkish air force.
The Turkish Airlines Boeing 737-800 crash on approach to Amsterdam Schiphol airport is the first survivable incident in which the anti-hijacking cockpit security door was shown to be a hazard for pilots
Turkey's main English language newspaper Hurriyet has reported an on-scene witness statement that one of the pilots survived the crash even if badly injured, but he was not rescued in time to save his life.