It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheRealDonPedros
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
"I also have to bring up, again, this question? If a parents right to teach a child poor living habits infringes on the childs right to have a healthy upbringing, which person's right supercedes the other? Thats right, that one not infringing on the other."
------------------------------------------------------------
You're mistaking "the child's right" with "your idea" of the child's right. The child and the parents are entitled to "LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of HAPPINNESS" as they define it...Not as you define it.
You're the one doing the infringing.
Peace
[edit on 24-2-2009 by TheRealDonPedros]
Originally posted by BlackOps719
I would much rather have them put a moratorium on stupid people breeding with one another.
Originally posted by TheRealDonPedros
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
"Its not about taking it easy and ignoring the bad, its about taking the bad with the good, and doing whatever you can to help those that need it and those that have nothing else."
----------------------------------------------
Again were talking about "your definition of good or bad". One day son when you realize that "good or bad" are just perspective based and truly understand the golden rule as : "Whatever circumstances allowed this person to become so fat, it could've been me.. I AM THEM.. AND THEY ARE ME.."
Through that golden understanding you will now let "your definition" of bad be ignored. Not because you still don't think its bad but because it could've been you.
Peace
ps - .. and its a good thing you only debate for fun..
[edit on 24-2-2009 by TheRealDonPedros]
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Man... I am seeing the issues we have NOW with foster care children. I can just envision it if all the tubby Thomases and Theresas were taken from their homes.
Not a pretty sight.
Yes, it is sad that these kids have such poor homelives. But trying to rip apart families to add a huge number of additional cases into the load that is already buckling seems...a less than optimal solution.
[edit on 2/24/2009 by Amaterasu]
Originally posted by TheRealDonPedros
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
And you can talk about putting myself in others shoes, but have you considered the reason why people usually get into the line of work that I am in?
--------------------------------------------------
Yes, because its always easier to tell someone else to look in the mirror than it is to look at your own reflection.
Exactly like what I'm doing right now.
Peace
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
I agree with you, and thats why, as I said before, I am an advocate not of taking children away, but of giving people the education and tools they need to teach their children about healthy living.
Originally posted by RFBurns
People start dictating how others should raise their kids in regards to eating and being healthy should foot the bill for those health programs and weight loss programs.
Put up or clam up.
Cheers!!!!
[edit on 24-2-2009 by RFBurns]
Originally posted by TheRealDonPedros
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
I assume you mean this question; "Better yet, let me pose another question: Do you consider it abuse, or the infringement upon a childs rights if a parent brings them into this world addicted to heroin, or advocate their use of heroin throughout childhood?"
You're putting the cart before the horse, the question wouldn't arise in a world where people had the ability to truly empathize with one another.
You're answer is to put more energy into the equation in the form of direct intervention. My answer is to add nothing to the equation in the form of empathic understanding. When you realize its a losing battle, you will start winning.
Peace