It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

anyone seen this video

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2002 @ 06:36 PM
link   
i have seen a lot of ufo videos but this one is the best. its video taken by an nasa shuttle in space. it depicts star wars. you see a small ufo slowly flying to the left and in the left corner you see a large flash. The ufo then takes off extremely quickly while a missle is headed towards it. i beleive that nasa came up with some BS explanation for it, but i believe its real.




posted on Jul, 8 2002 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Exodus mate,

Provide us with a link to this wonderous footage??



posted on Jul, 8 2002 @ 07:12 PM
link   
I saw this one already...did you ever think about who shot the missile????



posted on Jul, 8 2002 @ 09:35 PM
link   
coulda been our shuttle. or some nazi aliens. who knows



posted on Jul, 9 2002 @ 10:54 AM
link   
Seen it before...but i think we need to think about who fired it,like Hannibal said. That is some of the best proof i've seen though,i wonder what NASA had to say about it.



posted on Jul, 9 2002 @ 11:59 AM
link   
didn't nasa say it was ice crystals?



posted on Jul, 9 2002 @ 03:40 PM
link   
thats exactly what they said. theyre full of SH*T. my guess is that another ufo shot it. star wars. some sort of alien technology because that missle was goin FAST for no gravity.



posted on Jul, 9 2002 @ 03:41 PM
link   
maybe it wasnt a missile...could have been some secret weapon from the government...



posted on Jul, 9 2002 @ 05:06 PM
link   
doubt it. if we engaged aliens in combat and failed they are gunna be atacking earth.



posted on Jul, 10 2002 @ 07:14 AM
link   
If it was anything other than something mundane like ice, why did NASA let it out?

I've seen it, and others like it, there's no overwhelming indication these moving white spots are anything extraordinary. They could even be meteorites given the angle.


jra

posted on Jul, 10 2002 @ 12:57 PM
link   
i think i've seen this vid as well. i'd have to agree with william. there is not enough evidance to show what these things are. for all we know they could be some tiny bits of debry 6 ft away from the camera.

i remember NASA saying that they fired one of there manuvering thrusters. so that "missle" that shoots by would probably be just som frozen particle that came from the thruster. the other object which is supposedly the Alien ship changes direction. well it probably just looks like it did because the shuttel is manuvering, so it looks like the particle is changing direction when it's really the shuttle.

and lastly. if it where some fottage of some missle shooting at an alien ship. we would not be seeing it on tv. there is no way something like that would get out in the public. also, if NASA really wanted to release that footage but were hoping people wouldn't see the "missle" and "alien ship". why wouldn't they have just edited them out? it's very easy to do. this just leads me to believe that it's not some alien ship at all.



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 06:11 AM
link   
i've seen it , they said it was the australian equivalent to the star wars defense or whatever you call it. there were two vids one showed that it was above australian aerospace hence why (suposedly) they tried to shoot it down.

i think you'll find it at www.area-x.co.uk amongst the downloads



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 06:40 AM
link   
This is what amazes me about the UFO community.

heres a video of somthing zipping past the screen in space.
Nasa says its an ice crystall close to the camera being zipped off course by thrusters, a perfectly logical explanation, easily replicated, in fact most of us will have witnessed similar looking footage of particals floating close to cameras on deep sea diving missions and yet everyone is far more ready to believe its proof of an earth space defense mechanism shooting down a UFO, an explanation that has literally thousands of unresolved issues questions and logistical problems.

why the hells that?



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 09:16 AM
link   
Once I posted a link to some of those movies...

Some of those things were blinking...
Ice crystals or not... Who knows..



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 09:19 AM
link   
Also, if the camera on th shuttle was moving or changing direction so quickly... Shouldn't the image of the Earth be moving also, because of the camera's position relative to the Earth???



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 09:33 AM
link   
an Ice crystal under the light of a camera moveing would appear to blink when in motion simply through refraction of its facects.

Secondly the camera is stationary. Nasa claim the crystal / dust particle / fleck of paint is pushed away by a thruster.




[Edited on 29-10-2002 by Lupe_101]



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 09:47 AM
link   
If the thrusters were on, that means the space shuttle also had to be moving, making the camera move also... Or else Nasa should discard those thrusters..


I found some more info....

www.mysterystuff.com...



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 09:49 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 09:58 AM
link   
There are too many things flying around in different directions in that picture to be coincidentally ice particles from a goddamn "thruster". Your explanations are void.



posted on Oct, 29 2002 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by HannibalSmith
I saw this one already...did you ever think about who shot the missile????


Well, I saw this video, and the flash-light was looking coming from North-America.



Posted by William

BLAH!

If it was anything other than something mundane like ice, why did NASA let it out?

I've seen it, and others like it, there's no overwhelming indication these moving white spots are anything extraordinary. They could even be meteorites given the angle.

William, it was the NASA STS-41 mission, and the communications ( audio & video ) weren't crypted. Since this " incident ", all coms are now crypted. I wonder why...


And it's not the NASA who let it out. It's an astrophysical-scientist who have received the transmision and released it to the public. And the NASA was looking pretty anger.


[Edited on 29-10-2002 by ultra_phoenix]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join