Alien Photographed in Alaska!

IMO this picture is alot to blury to prove anything
i am not saying it's impossible, it is just not good anought
to be accepted as a proof

I don't know what kind of trees are pictured here, but the landscape of the trees does not look like Alaska, at tleast where I have been in Alaska. Do you have a city or landmark this was taken at or near.

1930's?????

Ya might want to check out the camera technology

Thats of course IF he had the latest.

images.google.com.au...

I got a couple of these in my treasure chest.

Not an easy thing to take a "quick shot" with these.

I call hoax for this reason alone

Cheers

Mungo


[edit on 27/2/2009 by mungodave]

reply to post by mungodave


That was my thoughts last time this was posted too

Originally posted by Chadwickus
The story, to me, doesn't match the photo, He gave chase until he was close enough to snap a photo?

But the 'alien' is standing looking at the photographer.

Also, it would be interesting to know what camera was used.

Was it an older style (for 1930's) camera where the photographer has to stand still for several seconds, or is it a more modern (for the 1930's) camera?

Here's a link to a few 1930's cameras:
licm.org.uk...

Link can be found here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I have noticed in the threads that no matter what the photograph or video, its never detailed enough for everyone. I think the golden age of ufo/alien pictures is in the years ahead when cameras are so good that real evidence is irrefutable.

Im still laughing at the bear remark.


looks pretty convincing im not going to say it is a fake im undecided

Originally posted by Enphamus
I have noticed in the threads that no matter what the photograph or video, its never detailed enough for everyone. I think the golden age of ufo/alien pictures is in the years ahead when cameras are so good that real evidence is irrefutable.

So true! You know if we were in the age where we could provide a 3d hologram it still would not be good enough.