It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spacial
This is why gravity changes in strength towards the poles and why water down a drain spins in opposite directions north and south of the equator.
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by spacial
Earth's gravity varies slightly at different points of its surface but it has nothing to do with the latitude.
www.space.com...
The GRACE program supports my theory. Gravity does in fact increase towards the equator over all according to their site and by looking at the gravity maps.. Other factors, more importantly oceans, have greater gravitational strength because they exert more outward force because water is more pliable and can congregate easier .
www.csr.utexas.edu...
I would also predict that the gravity maps will change because of the influence of the moon and suns fields. We have to wait until the next lot of data is released or when the european data comes in and compare but if in fact that is correct i would hope people would at least consider what i am saying.
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by spacial
The moon effects high tide and low tide by pulling water to it with its gravity , and is strongest when on the opposite side of the earth from the sun.
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by spacial
The moon effects high tide and low tide by pulling water to it with its gravity , and is strongest when on the opposite side of the earth from the sun.
Originally posted by rich23
You haven't read all of the links. Go back, do that, and maybe you'll be able to contribute something to the discussion that hasn't already been said and rejected.
Originally posted by rich23
Have you done any of the experiments yourself?
Originally posted by rich23
If your maths is really that good, why don't you do that: look at the photo, do the calculations I suggested earlier in the thread, from which you can deduce the size and therefore approximate mass of the ball bearings, and see if there's a non-negligible divergence that accounts for the difference in trajectories?
Originally posted by rich23
Then you'd be contributing something to the thread, rather than not reading what's been posted and just interposing your own prejudices on the matter.
"We don't necessarily have a technical opinion," he said, though "we would certainly love to see this work."
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spacial
reply to post by spacial
I disagree that the gravity map show any general increase in gravity based on latitude or ocean areas.
The northern latitudes seem to show just as much area showing increased gravity as reduced. The same applies to southern latitudes.
If anything, the trend for the ocean basins seems to be more of an average or reduced level than increased. Look at the Indian Ocean, the Western Atlantic, the majority of the Pacific, and Southern Ocean between Australia and South America.
a52.g.akamaitech.net...
[edit on 2/23/2009 by Phage]
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by harrytuttle
Bruce De Palma Published his findings years ago.
The same debunking methods you are using didn't work then when we peer-reviewed his work.
I suggest you spend more time reading his conclusions and less time trying to debunk reality.
You did bother read De Palma's Paper didn't you?
(Surely you are not relying on the OP...)
reply to post by Phage
In regard to the OP, there doesn't seem to be any published work or repetition of the experiment showing any validation. Not surprising since De Palma used his arm to launch the spinning balls. Very tightly controlled experiment there. I suppose there's no chance that different launch velocities (speed and direction) had any thing to do with the "results".
A lack of controlled experiments with repeatable results seems to be a common problem with demonstrations of gravity control but that doesn't stop people from touting them.
Originally posted by Johnmike
Yeah. I saw links to Hoagland's Enterprise Mission, and absolutely ridiculous and sensationalist fake physics site that I cannot take seriously due to its hilarious and pathetically extravagant history. I failed to find a reliable alternative in my five second Google search, so I need your help.
... don't have the time right now...