It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Those statistics are overly simplistic.
The Japanese don't smoke marijuana, yet they have among the lowest rates of murder and heart disease, and the greatest longevity. They have other diseases, related mostly to their consumption of soy.
Originally posted by caballero
reply to post by vcwxvwligen
What are you talking about?
Your post makes no sense what so ever.
Let me tell you straight up, your arguments are very flawed and they lack evidence to back them up.
Your basically giving us your biased opinion.
Read up on some facts.
More marijuana used by Americans is produced in America, border control has made it harder for international imports.
And if we were to legalize THC, then the whole plant would obviously be legal. You cant make certain parts of things legal and other parts of the same thing illegal thats idiotic.
[edit on 23-2-2009 by caballero]
[edit on 23-2-2009 by caballero]
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
reply to post by Reddupo
Ok, but after you're done with that, read this: www.sciencedaily.com...
A BMJ editorial1 attracted a very large electronic mail bag, it was criticized for flawed arithmetic35 and pilloried in a book on logical thinking.36 A subsequent editorial substantially has corrected its message37 and put things in better perspective; but the statement about bullae remains uncorrected. It is of great concern that this belief about cannabis and lung bullae should have gained such wide acceptance without the production of better evidence. Perhaps myths are more easily made than forgotten.
Originally posted by Reddupo
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
reply to post by Reddupo
Ok, but after you're done with that, read this: www.sciencedaily.com...
Okay but after you're done with that, read a scientific review of that study here: jrsm.rsmjournals.com...
Turns out the study used only four patients to make that statement of causation.
A BMJ editorial1 attracted a very large electronic mail bag, it was criticized for flawed arithmetic35 and pilloried in a book on logical thinking.36 A subsequent editorial substantially has corrected its message37 and put things in better perspective; but the statement about bullae remains uncorrected. It is of great concern that this belief about cannabis and lung bullae should have gained such wide acceptance without the production of better evidence. Perhaps myths are more easily made than forgotten.
The truth is, when you find all the negative articles on marijuana, you'll find larger, more credible studies disproving them. An example is the "pot smokers 20x more likely to get lung cancer" found by a terrible poll without using proper scientific method, and the largest cannabis-lung cancer study EVER conducted (which was done by ucla) saying there is absolutely no link.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Anyway, the jury is not out that marijuana is 100% safe, much less life-enhancing
"No link" meaning that the participants exhibited multiple risk factors?
Originally posted by Reddupo
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Anyway, the jury is not out that marijuana is 100% safe, much less life-enhancing
"No link" meaning that the participants exhibited multiple risk factors?
Yes well the jury got out a long time ago and is vacationing in Acapulco that high fructose corn syrup and caffeine are terrible for you.
You want to pretend that there is something so incredibly lethal inside marijuana that science or thousands of years of experience have just happened to not come across?
Yes we've proven there are some amazing benefits to it. This is apparent in both empirical and anecdotal evidence. Yes there might be a 1-2% drop in lung function if you're a chronic user, but if you run in bad shoes you can develop knee problems. Are you going to not fly in airplanes because there is a 1/100000 chance you'll be on one that crashes?
There is just no argument for illegality. Especially "it might hurt you...maybe".
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
That's what I'm saying, in order to legalize THC extract the leaf has to be legalized as well.
Originally posted by obilesk
reply to post by vcwxvwligen
I am speechless at the ignorance in your posts. Please don't take it as an insult, but it sounds like ravings of the culturally brainwashed. Honestly, if the things you are claiming (THC is a poison and all of that) are true, I would love to see some vcwxvwligen-approved sources for that conclusion. And just so you know, I don't give in to the argument that anything external from the body that is free of grade-school-accepted nutrients is somehow automatically a poison.
At any rate, the point of Ron Paul's and just about everyone else's argument is that despite the few negative things that can be scientifically proven to be attributed to the use of cannabis, the good that it can provide + the terror and waste of the drug war = make it legal or at least decriminalized. We aren't worshiping a plant, we are shouting for our freedom and for some common sense to prevail!
Originally posted by ExistenceUnknown
reply to post by vcwxvwligen
You are absolutely correct that there are other problems that need to be dealt with. But what could be more easy than legalization? We already have the infrastructure to support it. It would create thousands of jobs, billions of dollars in revenue, and do away with HALF of the prison population. All of this can be done with a simple stroke of a pen. Punishment for a personal choice to consume drugs is horrible. We should take the common sense approach of damage control and education.
[edit on 24-2-2009 by ExistenceUnknown]
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Saying that it would be "easy" amounts to encouraging apathy.
Money is not going to magically rain down courtesy of the marijuana gods. The money that people would spend on marijuana has to come from somewhere, and I'm not sure whether it would come from the bailouts. Rich people who smoke are already spending their money on it. If it were legal I'm sure more people would rather grow it than pay $20 for an 1/8 of an ounce, like people do in other countries. The only marijuana that people would actually pay for would be the potent kind, which requires chemicals to grow. Ron Paul himself has suggested that it should not even be taxed.
Originally posted by ExistenceUnknown
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Saying that it would be "easy" amounts to encouraging apathy.
Money is not going to magically rain down courtesy of the marijuana gods. The money that people would spend on marijuana has to come from somewhere, and I'm not sure whether it would come from the bailouts. Rich people who smoke are already spending their money on it. If it were legal I'm sure more people would rather grow it than pay $20 for an 1/8 of an ounce, like people do in other countries. The only marijuana that people would actually pay for would be the potent kind, which requires chemicals to grow. Ron Paul himself has suggested that it should not even be taxed.
Ron Paul suggests it shouldn't be taxed because he believes in a totally free country. I agree with his statement. However we already enforce "sin" taxes on cigarettes and alcohol so I don't see why we wouldn't do the same for marijuana.
Your assumption that people would rather grow it than buy is purely speculation. Purchasing it seems easier to me than having to grow it and tend to it (regardless of how easy it is to grow). Only the real devoted people will grow their own and even then it would be illegal to distribute. This argument also does not hold water because millions of people smoke it now when its illegal and a large quantity of them prefer buying it over growing it. Make it cheaper to buy than it is currently and you will have the same result.
It seems to me that all the people who are for keeping it illegal don't seem to grasp that millions of people use marijuana every day with little, if any, negative side-effects except for the insane legal repercussions.
Money, my friend, would indeed be immediately noticeable. If legalized all the money that currently is dumped into the black market will automatically be pulled into legitimate businesses. We also do away with the costs of jailing non-violent criminals, and wasted taxpayer money on court cases involving marijuana.