It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof of the biggest cover up in the history of mankind

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Proof of the biggest cover up in the history of mankind


sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov

This is images of the sun , taken by soho camera. The images are consistant in that they are identical images of an object that is very, very large.This will give some peace to people looking for proof of things that can not possibly be lense anomlies, conspiracy or man made. The object would have to be at least 50,000 km long. the images in the c3 ( blue) clearly show multiple objects that could not be an anomly.
(visit the link for the full news article)











[edit on 21-2-2009 by guessing]




posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:22 PM
link   
The speed of light means objects travelling at this speed could in fact get from the sun to earth in around 8 minutes, the soho camera takes a picture aprox every 20 minutes. The dates on the pictures are real. This is it folkes... so as the world as we know it crumbles around us please be calm in the knowledge that the truth is finally revealed. this is form the most rleiable source, can you guess who?

sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:26 PM
link   
[edit on 2/21/2009 by Shakezoola]



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:27 PM
link   
can you fix your links please!



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Is it just me? but I can find nothing in the Nasa link that even remotely says what your clip states. Also your independent links do not work.



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:34 PM
link   
Cant seem to find the link and posting to the main page doesnt help either.

Please repost the link.



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:36 PM
link   
yep, I can't find anything either.... what is it exactly that you are talking about here OP?? those are some pretty provocative words your using...

[edit on 21-2-2009 by Chonx]



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:46 PM
link   
OP, what exactly are we supposed to be looking at?

Please can you imbed the images you are refering to and explain them to us?

Much appreciated, ty

MR



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:50 PM
link   
Not seeing what the big deal is, I am curious though....



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:54 PM
link   
What are you trying tp prove , im lost.??



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 12:59 PM
link   
I'm confused. I followed the other thread recently about the same subject, but this is apparently above my head. These photos just aren't giving me clear evidence.



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:00 PM
link   
[edit on 21-2-2009 by visible_villain]



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:02 PM
link   
This is not Breaking News. This is your personal opinion. This is in the wrong forum.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


The images are not showing objects.

Cosmic rays: High energy particles from the solar wind, and from the galaxy as a whole, whip around the SOHO spacecraft and interact with the detectors. These produce spots and streaks on the detector ranging from a single pixel, to large streaks that span a large fraction of the image.

sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

If you can show a sequence of images with the same "objects" there will be something to consider.



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
This is not Breaking News. This is your personal opinion. This is in the wrong forum.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


The images are not showing objects.

Cosmic rays: High energy particles from the solar wind, and from the galaxy as a whole, whip around the SOHO spacecraft and interact with the detectors. These produce spots and streaks on the detector ranging from a single pixel, to large streaks that span a large fraction of the image.

sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

If you can show a sequence of images with the same "objects" there will be something to consider.


Your attempts to distract me are becoming tiresome.

Your personal opinion is this is not breaking news when , believe it my son, it is!

[edit on 21-2-2009 by guessing]



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:11 PM
link   
?


a second line just to reiterate my confusion.

[edit on 21-2-2009 by Chonx]



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:13 PM
link   
reply to post by guessing
 


I'm assuming you mean "attempts"

And if facts are distracting for you, then you are a lost cause.

Back up the tree with you I say!



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:18 PM
link   
So we're well past the 8 minute mark..........can I relax?



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by guessing
 


I'm assuming you mean "attempts"

And if facts are distracting for you, then you are a lost cause.

Back up the tree with you I say!


Don't remember directing anything at you. The fact is the tree is already about to land on you,,,,



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by guessing
 


Hey there guessing. Maybe instead of getting defensive and having a pop at fellow ATSers you should clarify what you meant by the title of the thread, present and explain your evidence and let us decide whether we want to invest more time here or move on. Saves all the messing around.


oh, and this IS directed at you. thanks in advance.



posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:24 PM
link   
I see photo data...and hear "around 8 minutes" and "this is it". But that's it. I'm still confused. Help!



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join