The report found the camp to be in compliance with the Geneva Conventions Common Article 3, the international rules that require the humane treatment of prisoners taken in unconventional armed conflicts, like the war on terrorism. The camp's controversial force-feeding of prisoners on hunger strikes was also found to be compliant with the Geneva guidelines, a second government official confirmed.
The article goes on to say that the judge who is in charge of deciding whether to charge detainees told The Washington Post that detainee Mohammed al-Qahtani alleged that at least one person was tortured. The wording on that particular paragraph is a bit confusing though so someone please correct me if I read it wrong.
So basically according to this report the detainees have been treated humanely according to the Geneva Conventions. I don't know how accurate that is, but that's the official word on it. What do you think? Would you agree or disagree with the official report based on the limited information available since it hasn't been released as of yet?
news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


