posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 01:01 AM
Thank you for responding. In clarifying what I aM sayig, I have no dispute whatsoever with what I consider you to be requesting, or demanding,
whatever, as, "reasonable" activity for your members.
However, in rememberance of these policies, I submit, that the Ats staff also remembers, "the fact that 10% of the topics discussed here are the
exposure of conspiracies; similar to this, "unfortunate B-6 incident"".??
All I am saying is that, " I agree 100 percent that illegal activities/conspiracys, must for the right reasons, be discussed in a, "fitting"
How can you ever understand I meaN that enough noW??" Do not believe I am questioning your, "reasonable" effort in any way..
My concern is that there are many, many cases simaler to the B-6 issue.
I believe it is prudent to be informed concerning the values, and disadvantages of the various substances in existance. Otherwise you are, "dumbed"
ie. "It's ok to knoW what is around you; wheather it is a natural, "healthy" substance, or not..
This way in a, "post 2012" situation, for example wheather I beleive in it or not, people might be aware of different avenues of
preparation/movement, in order to preserve the well-being of themselves and their loved ones.
Please do not get me wrong.. My only concern is that these lines can become, "blurred" in the face of, "peer/world/societal" pressure from a world
that does not understand that, "narural substances sustain life naturally, while others do not..
While we are suppose to be a collection of people who believe in, "natural/life giving" substances regardless of who wants to illegalize them..
We arE not suppose to be doing this for ourselves ; but for the preservation of the wellbeing of our children..
So; Yes I agree with what you said; bottom line; totally; enD of discussion..
I aM only expressing concern. I am asking you to remembeR the question you most likly asked within your-selves at one time or another, "where will
the line be drawN?"..
The cause for the outlaw of many things is that they tend to be impowering us instead of the PTB, and that, "their" their tendancies are often,
"disarming" to the people, while they become empowered with the freedom of using it..
Fuel-less technologies, vitamins, anything that empowers any-more is a, " national security" secret? I am not advocating, "druge".. However I do
have a question concerning who has the authority of telling me what is a drug and what is not..
That is not the issue though.. The issue is wheather a substance is banned because it is empowering or because it is bad for you..
To put it simply, many things are illegal because it is common sense that they are harmful..
However the problem as we know "here on the conspiracy page" is that, there is a tendancy to keep, "liberating/empowering technologies, food,
etc." from those who are not, "in power".. Thus conspiracy..
I was only concerned that a reasonible amount of leniance concerning these issues could be in question..
I must admit, I believe I have seen a reasonible effort to keep the playing field level. I am just expressing concern.. ThanX!!
[edit on 21-2-2009 by noconsequence]