It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Ghost, that's the same as when I asked, "If Strategic means high flying, would tactical mean that it can fight back?"
Same thing man, o and it's not TR-3, it's TR3-B.
They both serve for the same purpose, are both highly advanced, are both triangular shaped. Ok maybe the TR3-B is made as a test platform, but it still serves for reconaissance.
Just because it has A or B in it, does not mean it has to be the same model.
And! According to your assumption, the TR3-B would not be real, because A comes before B. Which would mean that the Black Manta came before the TR3-B.
Originally posted by intelgurl
Once again I am skeptical, but I can't reconcile my skepticism with things seen by my eyes. A rather unusual place to be...
[edit on 27-1-2005 by intelgurl]
Originally posted by ghost
Above is the drawing of a TR-3A. Below is a TR-3B:
I don't know what you all think, but I say they are MUCH TOO Different to be the same aircraft. The basic shape and layout are distinctly different. The Designations A and B indicate that both aircraft are supposed to be different versions of the same model/aircraft.
The Sura facility was commissioned in 1981. Using this facility, Russian researchers achieved extremely interesting results regarding the ionosphere behavior and discovered the effect of generation of low-frequency emission at the modulation of ionosphere current. At the beginning, Soviet Defense Department mostly footed the bill. The American HAARP ionospheric heater is similar to the Sura facility. The HAARP project began in 1993