It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bank of America's CEO is subpoenaed

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 20 2009 @ 01:06 AM
link   
I knew I should've shorted BofA...

www.cnn.com...

updated 37 minutes ago
Bank of America's CEO is subpoenaed
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- New York State Attorney General's Office issues the subpoena
- It's investigating whether Bank of America withheld information from investors
- Bank purchased Merrill Lynch, which is accused of secretly doling out huge bonuses
- Bank says Merrill was "independent company" when the bonuses were given

(CNN) -- Bank of America CEO and Chairman Kenneth Lewis has been issued a subpoena by the New York State Attorney General's Office, which is investigating whether the bank violated state law by withholding information from investors, a source familiar with the investigation told CNN.

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has been highly critical of Wall Street firms in general and Merrill Lynch in particular for the way they have conducted themselves in the midst of a financial crisis.

Last week, he accused Merrill Lynch, which was acquired by Bank of America late last year, of secretly doling out big bonuses before reporting a huge quarterly loss.

"Merrill Lynch's decision to secretly and prematurely award approximately $3.6 billion in bonuses, and Bank of America's apparent complicity in it, raise serious and disturbing questions," Cuomo wrote in a letter to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts, chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services.

In his letter to Frank, Cuomo said Merrill gave bonuses of at least $1 million each to 696 employees, with a combined $121 million going to the top four recipients. The next four recipients were awarded a total of $62 million, and the next six received $66 million, he said. In all, the bonuses for 2008 totaled $3.6 billion.

"While more than 39,000 Merrill employees received bonuses from the pool, the vast majority of these funds were disproportionately distributed to a small number of individuals," Cuomo wrote. "Indeed, Merrill chose to make millionaires out of a select group of 700 employees."

The attorney general said Merrill "awarded an even smaller group of top executives what can only be described as gigantic bonuses."

Cuomo also claimed Merrill handed out the bonuses ahead of its federally funded acquisition by Bank of America, which was announced in mid-September and closed by year's end.

It "appears that, instead of disclosing their bonus plans in a transparent way as requested by my office, Merrill Lynch secretly moved up the planned date to allocate bonuses and then richly rewarded their failed executives," Cuomo wrote.

Bank of America has received $45 billion in federal bailout money, including $20 billion to support its takeover of Merrill. Bank of America reported a net loss of $1.79 billion for the fourth quarter. Merrill reported a net loss of $15.31 billion for the fourth quarter.

Bank of America spokesman Scott Silvestri that Merrill was "an independent company" when the bonuses were awarded.

"Bank of America did urge the bonuses be reduced, including those at the high end," Silvestri wrote. "Although we had a right of consultation, it was their ultimate decision to make."

Silvestri said the top executives for Bank of America "took no incentive compensation for 2008," with an 80 percent reduction for the "next level" of executives.

Top executives from Bank of America -- as well as Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo -- appeared before the Financial Services Committee last week to explain how they spent the $165 billion they received from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

In the testimony, Lewis said he received no bonus for 2008 and was paid a salary of $1.5 million.

Bank of America's stock, which traded higher than $40 a share in the past year, closed at a fresh 52-week low of $3.93 a share Thursday. It's the largest bank in terms of assets in the United States and is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.




posted on Feb, 20 2009 @ 01:26 AM
link   
I wish the government suddenly cared about corruption and wrong-doings...

What is it things like this are called, "Dog and Pony show" ? Eh.

Regardless, please watch this story and see what develops, I guess...

And,
don't get your hopes up.



posted on Feb, 20 2009 @ 01:26 AM
link   
You know, for many years I've wondered why the shareholders let the financial company's management and CEOs get away with these huge bonuses, even in boom times. These are PUBLIC COMPANIES that are controlled by shareholders. The big pension plans, the big fund managers and traders who own and control blocks of these companies: why did they ever think that 8-figure payouts to CEOs and others were acceptable? The argument was always "we need excellent leadership so its worth paying for" but give me a break. Common sense should dictate taht no human being is worth that much!

Why weren't the share owners putting the screws to the board of directors about this stuff years ago? Why is it suddenly such a surprise, and why are they even talking about the need for government/legal prevention of large bonuses? There should be no need for that. The SHAREHOLDRS should step up to the plate and introduce/vote for a resolution that changes things, or else throw the bums off the board who allow this sort of thing to go on. Why didn't this happen ten years ago? Something is very not-right abut this.



new topics
 
1

log in

join