It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Limbaugh Links Liberals to Murderers, Rapists

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:04 PM
link   

Limbaugh Links Liberals to Murderers, Rapists


www.newser.com

Rush Limbaugh today complained on his radio show that Democrats have morphed into "liberal socialists" and "must be stopped." That was the routine part. But he then "pushed the envelope," writes Sam Stein in the Huffington Post, with a rant that linked liberal ideas to murderers, rapists, and "this Muslim guy" who beheaded his wife near Buffalo.
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:04 PM
link   
Ha ha, nice! It's a wonder anyone takes this nut seriously!

It's kooks like him who wish they had power but will never get it. Such a bitter old man really should just retire and grow old(er) and die alone.

Limbaugh's policy? "Anyone who doesn't agree with me is super evil, like the rapists!!!!"

Fail.

He's a pretty good in real life troll, though.

www.newser.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 19-2-2009 by sadisticwoman]



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:21 PM
link   
It's gonna suck in 4 years when his type are the ones herding us into FEMA camps. How anyone can advocate for a return to the policies which brought us to where we are now is beyond me.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:21 PM
link   
Funny when the vast majority of sexual impropriety in congress comes from republicans last I heard. But hey, if it sounds good he'll probably say whatever he wants. Sort of like how now republicans in congress are now complaining about "democrat big government spending" whilst forgetting about the last 8 years when they were on board with Bush.


[edit on 19-2-2009 by ghaleon12]



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:24 PM
link   
What he said was true. Just on this board I have seen many posts where posters sympathize with terrorists, where criminals are given a pass because they may have had a rough childhood, or because they were on drugs while they committed their crimes. I don't care either why someone has committed a crime. I don't care to understand their motivation, nor try to rationalize their crimes. Many liberals do, however.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:27 PM
link   
reply to post by stevegmu
 


Wanting to know why doesn't turn us into that which we are pondering, it turns us into... humans! To question and wonder is to be human.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by stevegmu
What he said was true. Just on this board I have seen many posts where posters sympathize with terrorists, where criminals are given a pass because they may have had a rough childhood, or because they were on drugs while they committed their crimes. I don't care either why someone has committed a crime. I don't care to understand their motivation, nor try to rationalize their crimes. Many liberals do, however.


^ 100 % agreed



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:45 PM
link   
Limbaugh is a mook.

And I'm very Liberal, but I believe if you commit a crime you pay for it. If you intentionally harm someone you no matter what your predisposition or problems in life, you go to Jail, or in some cases death row.

He is saying that all Liberals are the same and we all believe that Terrorists and Murderers with bad child hoods should be let off. No i don't think that... I think if you do something wrong, you know you're doing something wrong, and you should be punished for it in some way, even if only to learn what you've done and to never do it again (with in reality based on what you did)

However people who sympothize with other peoples problems aren't bad people. I'm not saying let them off, I'm saying, feel sorry that their life sucks. You don't have to do anything about it but at least show the rest of Humanity some respect. Jeez.

I'm just tired of this guy, he just panders to extremists and spends most of his time spouting narcissistic psychobable. I am happy to exist in a nice middle ground and will probably never take anything he says with more than a grain of salt. Not a big grain, but still a grain.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:46 PM
link   
reply to post by stevegmu
 


There are things that I am liberal about. And there are things I am not. But Good vs Evil arguments are just not enough anymore. We know too much. Terrorists are created not born. And we don't always have to agree with policy. Though it has been high time for the Republicans to re-emerge as a party of fiscal responsibility. Most of this country is conservative to varying degree. But that does not mean that all liberals sympathize with terrorists. # terrorists. I just don't think torture is really a good way to do things. I think the first round of bailouts by Bush were horrible and Obama's will be worse, and far more plentiful. I think Iraq was a complete shame, and I think Afghanistan has been largely ignored liberals and I differ greatly on Afghanistan policy, but it is the same with conservatives.

I'm for marijuana legalization. I'm for a non-interventionist policy. I'm for privacy and fiscal responsibility with responsible monetary policy. And I personally believe that the Liberals in Congress like Pelosi will be the destruction of America. And when they cause it, the conservatives will say "I told you so" ignoring their role and complicity. My point, the longer we debate science and economics with political ideology the worse off we're going to be. I feel the same way about getting down to business with religion as I do with political ideology, they just don't mix. All four are mutually exclusive in many ways. We need common sense not more blind ideology. Leave Science to Science, Leave Economics to Economics, Leave Religion to Religion and Leave Politics at the door.



[edit on 19-2-2009 by projectvxn]



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:46 PM
link   
The liberal agenda is one of moral relativism. In other words, there is no right or wrong, no black and white. Everything comes in shades of gray. If someone rapes a woman, he has anger issues because he was mistreated as a child. If someone holds up a liquor store, it is because they are poor and need money to survive,(rather than get a job.) If some one commits murder, then he(or she) has anger issues, and problems with impulse control,
Sorry, but as a conservative, I ain't buying this crap. I don't listen to Rush. Don't particularly care for him. I perfer Jerry Doyle, Mike Reagan, or G. Gordon Liddy. The discussions, I find, are much more intelligent. Jerry does go off the deep end once in a while, but it's fun to listen to him rant about Whorehouse Harry Reid.
In this case, Rush is Right!



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by stevegmu
What he said was true. Just on this board I have seen many posts where posters sympathize with terrorists, where criminals are given a pass because they may have had a rough childhood, or because they were on drugs while they committed their crimes. I don't care either why someone has committed a crime. I don't care to understand their motivation, nor try to rationalize their crimes. Many liberals do, however.


What if I told you the BOTH parties were murderers and rapists what would you say? Its obvious this thread will get a lot of attention because our nation still buys into the two party crime family. People will say no I dont I know there is a difference but then fall for traps and shills like Rush Limbaugh. Is there a difference between "liberals" showing sympathy to scumbag hole in the wall sex offenders and "neocons" showing sympathy to religious sex offenders? How come NEITHER party is pursuing the crooks who have robbed this country blind?

Keep fighting my little sheeple the longer you fight the more freedoms the real powers take.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 10:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
The liberal agenda is one of moral relativism. In other words, there is no right or wrong, no black and white. Everything comes in shades of gray. If someone rapes a woman, he has anger issues because he was mistreated as a child. If someone holds up a liquor store, it is because they are poor and need money to survive,(rather than get a job.) If some one commits murder, then he(or she) has anger issues, and problems with impulse control,
Sorry, but as a conservative, I ain't buying this crap. I don't listen to Rush. Don't particularly care for him. I perfer Jerry Doyle, Mike Reagan, or G. Gordon Liddy. The discussions, I find, are much more intelligent. Jerry does go off the deep end once in a while, but it's fun to listen to him rant about Whorehouse Harry Reid.
In this case, Rush is Right!
Whorehouse Harry Reid???? What does that mean? Am I missing something?



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by PammyK

Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
The liberal agenda is one of moral relativism. In other words, there is no right or wrong, no black and white. Everything comes in shades of gray. If someone rapes a woman, he has anger issues because he was mistreated as a child. If someone holds up a liquor store, it is because they are poor and need money to survive,(rather than get a job.) If some one commits murder, then he(or she) has anger issues, and problems with impulse control,
Sorry, but as a conservative, I ain't buying this crap. I don't listen to Rush. Don't particularly care for him. I perfer Jerry Doyle, Mike Reagan, or G. Gordon Liddy. The discussions, I find, are much more intelligent. Jerry does go off the deep end once in a while, but it's fun to listen to him rant about Whorehouse Harry Reid.
In this case, Rush is Right!
Whorehouse Harry Reid???? What does that mean? Am I missing something?



hes from nevada, enough said.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by tjeffersonsghost

Originally posted by stevegmu
What he said was true. Just on this board I have seen many posts where posters sympathize with terrorists, where criminals are given a pass because they may have had a rough childhood, or because they were on drugs while they committed their crimes. I don't care either why someone has committed a crime. I don't care to understand their motivation, nor try to rationalize their crimes. Many liberals do, however.


What if I told you the BOTH parties were murderers and rapists what would you say? Its obvious this thread will get a lot of attention because our nation still buys into the two party crime family. People will say no I dont I know there is a difference but then fall for traps and shills like Rush Limbaugh. Is there a difference between "liberals" showing sympathy to scumbag hole in the wall sex offenders and "neocons" showing sympathy to religious sex offenders? How come NEITHER party is pursuing the crooks who have robbed this country blind?

Keep fighting my little sheeple the longer you fight the more freedoms the real powers take.


Of course there are murders from both parties. Difference is, we want to execute the murderers, liberals want to reform them.

Not quite sure what you mean by neocons showing sympathy towards Catholic priests. Catholics overwhelmingly vote Democratic.

I imagine there will be indictments in the near future.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:02 PM
link   
Okay, so let me count the ways that they are trying to provoke us. Note these are just the things I have read in the last 20 minutes...

Right now three things are happening.

1) Trying to divide and conquer us by turning our anger over the bailouts against our fellow citizens... ie, "I don't want to pay for that deadbeat's mortage"... Nah, but apparently it is okay to pay trillions to the banksters who are robbing us in plain sight.
2) "If you don't vote for the stimulus, you are racist."... I don't need to elaborate here. They're trying to pit us against eachother on this front also with the race-card.
3) Rush Limbaugh... Damn, I hope he would have ODed by now. Pill-popping hypocrite. Each and every single thing he says is venomous.

Don't fall into the trap, folks.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Swatman
 


No, not 'nuff said.
Tell me more, Why do you call Harry Reid, "whorehouse"?



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:05 PM
link   
People consider it republican "bashing" when I point out how full of crap Limbaugh is. Somehow they can't see that he is about as beneficial as cancer.

There is not ONE day that you can turn on Limbaugh and not hear the same rhetorical, anti-liberal, mudslinging, pseudo-intelligent lies. It's pathetic.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by spacedoubt
reply to post by Swatman
 


No, not 'nuff said.
Tell me more, Why do you call Harry Reid, "whorehouse"?




dont ask me i didnt call him it. probably has something to do with legalized prostitution in nevada



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Swatman
 


Figures you listen to Rush. So, basically, you just agreed, put your two cents in, but when asked to defend it, you just say, "I didn't say it."

That's classic man...



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 11:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Irish M1ck
People consider it republican "bashing" when I point out how full of crap Limbaugh is. Somehow they can't see that he is about as beneficial as cancer.

There is not ONE day that you can turn on Limbaugh and not hear the same rhetorical, anti-liberal, mudslinging, pseudo-intelligent lies. It's pathetic.


Don't listen, then. I didn't listen to Air America when it was on. He has, what, 20 million listeners? Air America went out of business.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join