It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
en.wikipedia.org...
Iran's first nuclear power plant, Bushehr I, is expected to be operational in 2009.[3] There are no current plans to complete the Bushehr II reactor, although the construction of 19 nuclear power plants is envisaged.[4] Iran has announced that it is working on a new 360 MWe nuclear power plant to be located in Darkhoyen. Iran has also indicated it that it will seek more medium-sized nuclear power plants and uranium mines for the future.......
....Interviews and surveys show that the majority of Iranians in all groups favor their country's nuclear program, including a full fuel cycle program, but most also believe that nuclear weapons are contrary to Islam.[77][78][79] Polls in 2008 showed that the vast majority of Iranians want their country to develop nuclear energy, and 90 percent of Iranians believe it is important (including 81% very important) for Iran "to have a full fuel cycle nuclear program."[80] Though Iranians are not Arab, Arab publics in six countries also believe that Iran has the right to its nuclear program and should not be pressured to stop that program
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by ACEMANN
no analysis - its your OPINION , which quite amazingly is flawed;
and what of israel - who have openly theatened to kill the US IAEA inspector going to dimona? who have a declared first use policy and a store house of over 200 nuclear weapons? even germany is a target for at least 1 israeli weapon - even in september a government spokesman reported on ynet said ` we will never forgive or forget ` when asked about germany and the nazi`s.
so who is the real threat to world peace .
Originally posted by ACEMANN
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by ACEMANN
I thought this thread was about Iran having enough Uranium Hexafluoride for a weapon
But they don't have any weapons grade material, which is the pertinent point here, and one which the doomsayers and media always leave out.
Ok, they have enough low enriched Uranium that COULD then be used for high end enrichment, but they have no means of enriching that low enriched Uranium to a weapons grade level. That is the crucial point.
Press articles like this, meant for distribution for the masses tend to leave out any of the more scientific basics and very pertinent points, instead running with sensationalist headlines and doom for the first couple of paragraphs. Now, many people scanning the papers read the headlines and the first part of the blurb but may not read the rest, having already absorbed the inaccurate leader. Job done!
[edit on 20-2-2009 by Britguy]
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by theblunttruth
apparntly you`ve never heard of the samson option - oh and since the 1950`s? i would suggest you read about the theft of the US uranium from NUMEC , Pa and what Shapiro`s role in this was ( and who he really worked for)
no israel stole from the USA the weapons grade uranium it needed to build 1/2 dozen bombs in the mid 1960`s
Originally posted by theblunttruth
Absolute tosh, Israel have had a nuclear arsenal since the 50s and have not used one or even threatened to use one, despite being surrounded by "enemies".
Originally posted by Britguy
But they don't have any weapons grade material, which is the pertinent point here, and one which the doomsayers and media always leave out.
Ok, they have enough low enriched Uranium that COULD then be used for high end enrichment, but they have no means of enriching that low enriched Uranium to a weapons grade level. That is the crucial point.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
I bet most of you sweet innocent, naive little kiddies don't even know what Tributylphosphate is for ?
TBP is a solvent and plasticizer for cellulose esters such as nitrocellulose and cellulose acetate. It forms stable hydrophobic complexes with some metals; these complexes are soluble in organic solvents as well as supercritical CO2. The major uses of TBP in industry are as a component of aircraft hydraulic fluid and as a solvent for extraction and purification of rare earth metals from their ores. [2]
TBP finds its use as a solvent in inks, synthetic resins, gums, adhesives (namely for veneer plywood) and herbicide and fungicide concentrates.
As it has no odour, it finds use as anti-foaming agent in detergent solutions, and in various emulsions, paints, and adhesives. It is also found as a defoamer in ethylene glycol-borax antifreze solutions.[citation needed] In oil-based lubricants addition of TBP increases the oil film strength. It is used also in mercerizing liquids, where it improves their wetting properties. It is also used as a heat exchange medium. [3] TBP is used in some consumer products such as herbicides and water thinned paints and tinting bases. [4]
Nuclear chemistry
A 15-40% (usually about 30%) solution of tributyl phosphate in kerosene or dodecane is used in the liquid-liquid extraction (solvent extraction) of uranium, plutonium, and thorium from spent uranium nuclear fuel rods dissolved in nitric acid, as part of a nuclear reprocessing process known as PUREX.
The shipment of 20 tons of tributyl phosphate to North Korea from China in 2002, coinciding with the resumption of activity at Yongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center, was seen by the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency as cause for concern; that amount was considered sufficient to extract enough material for perhaps three to five potential nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by theblunttruth
On a related note, the IAEA have confirmed again the identification of Uranium at the former Syrian site, destroyed by Israel. Also they rule out the possibility the uranium came from the Israeli weapons used and again are struggling for co-operation from the Syrians. Seems the Israelis got it right.
Gives more credence to their suspicions over Irans program.
link
That is an extract from the same article you have referenced. They haven't excluded the possibility that it was unrelated to neuclear activity. There is no proof. Just speculation.
The latest report comes after a November report said the site had features resembling those of a nuclear reactor site, but it did not exclude the possibility that it was being used for purposes unrelated to nuclear activity.
In that first report on its findings, the IAEA said "significant" traces of uranium were also found.
Originally posted by Obliterated
reply to post by Harlequin
I agree with you. I don't understand why some countries are allowed to make nuclear weapons and others are not. I think that no one should be allowed, or everyone should be allowed. it is unfair to dictate to some and not to others.
The U.S has used them against Japan, yet they are the ones who get to call the shots. They shouldn't be allowed to have any say in the matter.
If Iran was to use them they would probably only blow up Israel, If Israel was to use them they would blow up the middle-east and europe. I think on a global scale Israel is a far greater threat to the world. They have the most enemies.