Originally posted by Cool Breeze
Were you there? Just curious because it seems to me that the same stuff you say I am basing my opinion (which it is not, once again I am just
reporting what I saw) on is the same thing you are basing your facts and opinions on. Sorry that I am saying what you apparently do not want to hear,
but if you weren't there and are just getting your facts from a few biased sources that makes your statements no more credible then mine in your eyes
(only because I forgot to bring my UAV on the days of the protests to be able to see everything going on at once. sorry but it was getting repairs
done, hasn't been flying like it used to:roll I would honestly like to know why you believe your account of what happened on those days because of
some vidoes and blog posts you have seen better than mine Like I said I was there and just was telling everyone what I had seen sorry that it
just happens to be on the other side of the argument than yours but to say that I am wrong just because it is different than a youtube video you saw
is very ignorant and close-minded [sic]. It was a little more complex than black and white (just like every other situation in the world today) so go
ahead and continue to believe I am an "agent" or that I am just coming on here to spread disinformation but I am pretty sure I am too young to be an
agent (just think about the video you saw and the average age of the people that were present).
[edit on 02/04/2009 by Cool Breeze]
I think you're twisting what I said. I didn't say I based my perspective on the same things on which you based yours. It's obvious you only saw a
portion of the protests, no matter what your sarcastic "excuse". You're also getting ugly and personal by calling me (or my arguments, implying me)
"ignorant" and "close-minded"; not to mention, I've been anything but closed-minded seeing as I read a range of materials covering that entire
week. This is not about me "not liking what I hear". lol. Nice try. You got defensive because you weren't able to accept my correcting your
ill-presented facts, which seemed designed to sidetrack a relevant discussion started by OP (a discussion which could affect all of us). You are going
off of a few hours on one day and from the actions from a few fringe people.
I've read the mainstream reports (whose truly biased side you seem to take) and I've read independent reports, too. I've seen videos you can't
argue with, ones showing the injuries and showing the footage of cops beating people up for no reason. You go watch every single one, instead of just
trash-talking the videos which you haven't obviously watched. I didn't say you were an agent (I don't get that from you), but by passing off your
limited experience as over-arching fact, you are indeed spreading disinformation. I was not there. That spared me the bias that you seem to have,
since you were apparently emotionally affected by the chaos of the immediate scene around you at some point and chose to focus on it rather than
the big picture. It's making you miss the legal and human rights significance of what actually happened.
Again - one day does not equal five. You are trying to make it sound like it does. I know both sides did wrong things. My point was that the entirely
of the situation clearly showed who was starting most of the trouble and behaving out of bounds. The cops and other authorities behaved badly, and
will have to face lawsuits now. Why else would $10 million of insurance be taken out beforehand? They knew the police would go brutal. You don't seem
to care about that part. Two broken windows and a few mischievous protestors seem to raise your dander more than all the wrongs committed by the
people who abused their power. So I take it you are in support of the RNC 8 going to prison for a long time for charges that were trumped up to make
them look like terrorists? And are you aware that 2 of 4 charges applied to each of them were added on only very recently, after they had a large
showing of support for one of their court dates? I suppose you think that's ok too. And I suppose you think it's ok that cops went around arresting
hundreds of people sitting on grass listening to music and then assigning random unjustified charges, right? And I guess you are in support of the
journalists who illegally had equipment taken away from them? And the 17-year-old with a bootprint in the back and a hospitalization? And for the
arrest of medics simply giving aid to wounded people? Why did you even bother to protest (I take it you were protesting) if you were on the side of
those against whom the people were protesting, anyway? I'm not sure you understand what the documentary or what the protests are really about.
Do you even know what we're arguing here? You claimed most people just wanted to tear stuff up. I'm simply stating that is not true. I am not
debating you saw some of the things you saw - trust me, we all heard about it in the MSM. Plus, there are activists out there who get upset at the few
who ruin it for the many, too. This is why there were peacemaking intermediaries later on in the week. If you knew what happened the whole week, you
would know that the brief initial violence did not become a pattern and that the pattern lied within the way the cops handled things. Anyway, if you
want proof that the whole situation is not what you painted it to be, I can list article after article and video after video. You trumped up one
little fact (mirroring the authorities' trumping up of charges), in the light of many other facts with which you
will not be able to argue no
matter how many times you repeat your one little fact. Somehow, with as ugly as you have gotten (and I admit I got a little snippy in my last post,
which was uncalled for, out of frustration with what you were spouting), I doubt you would want to study the truth of the whole situation.
[edit on 22-2-2009 by wintermarches]