It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by John Nada
If an intelligence exists that somehow created the Universe then it is not aware of us, just as we're not aware of things so small they might as well not exist. Believing and worshipping is futile because you are still going to die, and there is no afterlife waiting for you. You got life, that is the gift, the biggest punch in the stomach is that it wont last forever. All these memories and thoughts and they don't matter, they will one day cease to be and your consciousness will forever be gone.
I'm hoping technology will reach a stage where we can move our brains to a computer and live forever, but we were probably born in the wrong time frame for that. Plus the fact that even then the Universe will not last forever so that is also futile, eventually the lights will go out and it's game over for the whole show.
As for believers? I doubt for one second there wouldn't be one of you who'd jump at the chance of living forever if it were suddenly offered to you. That in itself makes the idea of looking forward to an afterlife a mockery. That plus I don't need a fear of God to make me a good person.
I can't believe in a God where I read about a teenager who put a cat in a microwave to "see what would happen".
I can't believe in a God when at a wedding I attended as we left the bride and groom were attacked by a bunch of yobs, ruining the day "under God". These pricks don't deserve to live never mind an afterlife.
I can't believe in God when we can watch objects bigger than our planet smash into Jupiter and then still believe there's a purpose to all this. Us witnessing it or not it still would've happened, and there's far larger events happening out there that make us insignificant.
I can't believe in a God when one day any numerous of events will come along and wipe us out, just like when we accidentally step on a bug it'll be as insignificant as that (do all these creatures go to heaven?). A meteorite will one day come and take us out. If we deal with that then one day the sun will die. If we somehow got out of the solar system then then next one we got to will one day die and so on and so forth until the day comes when the Universe and everything in it will die.
There is no purpose to life, you're just here, so just enjoy it. Or be a depressive and don't enjoy it, because it wont matter as you're going to die anyway. Just don't waste it believing crap.
Gaining consciousness is both our blessing and our curse. It gave us intelligence to do so many things but it also made us aware of our own death, something no animal should have to suffer. We needed to create religion to help us sleep at night, it's just unfortunate that as we've got even smarter that necessary creation is becoming less and less able to hold up.
I would love to be a believer, life would be so much easier to handle without having fear of death.
Sorry for the self indulgent ramble.
No need to apologize. You gave a realistic-looking perspective.
[edit on 22-2-2009 by John Nada]
Originally posted by Good Wolf
To have this debate it would help to have a clear definition to freewill. For the sake of the argument would you define it?
1. The ability or discretion to choose; free choice: chose to remain behind of my own free will.
2. The power of making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances or by an agency such as fate or divine will.
Well yes and no. The film thing was just an FYI. Science has some simple explanations for NDEs, some parts of the experiences are completely recreatable in the lab (like the feeling of peace and euphoria).
GW saw your post where you referenced determinism, you conveniently left out the compatabalists that see free will as ok. Come on Buddy, express your faith in one school, but be a man about it.
If a free action is defined as one that is not predetermined by prior causes, then determinism, which claims that human actions are predetermined, rules out the possibility of free actions.
en.wikipedia.org...
a free act in a way that does not hinge on the presence or absence of prior causes.
1. The ability or discretion to choose; free choice: chose to remain behind of my own free will.
2. The power of making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances or by an agency such as fate or divine will.
Basically to have a choice at all is to have free will. If anything, most people do not realize all the choices they make, especially choices they make subconsciously without thinking.
Er no. Human eye frame rate is often put around 60-80fsp (I've seen the 72fps figure a lot over the years). Anywho, the fact is that we don't see in frames.
Ok, well I was aware of it. But it is your eyes that only see 24 frames per second. The movie film just goes across the light, and fills up the entire 24 frames per second. Stays in sync with your 24 frames per second because it fills up the space between frames, and then runs constant, so you sync up with it.
en.wikipedia.org...
Even though computers, video and film works on distinct frames, sampled at discrete points in time, there are no evidence suggesting that the human visual system works in the same way. Therefore, it is impossible to express the limitations of human perception as a given maximum framerate.
Only if he is out of sync with the frequency of the wave does it become a wave. When in sync, it appears solid. Always the same thing. So the dimension or physical we are in would be the part we are in sync.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
You don't think that choice can be virtual or an illusion? That what appears to be choice is just the time that we spend deciding on how to act in response to the environment?
Er no. Human eye frame rate is often put around 60-80fsp (I've seen the 72fps figure a lot over the years). Anywho, the fact is that we don't see in frames.
en.wikipedia.org...
Even though computers, video and film works on distinct frames, sampled at discrete points in time, there are no evidence suggesting that the human visual system works in the same way. Therefore, it is impossible to express the limitations of human perception as a given maximum framerate.
It may be possible, however, to investigate the consequences of changes in framerate for human observers. The most famous example may be the wagon-wheel effect, a form of Aliasing in time, where a spinning wheel suddenly appears to change direction when its speed approach the framerate of the image capture/reproduction system.
Different capture/playback systems may operate at the same framerate, and still give a different level of "realism" or artefacts attributed to framerate. One reason for this may be the temporal characteristics of the camera and display device.
and why would such a deception be needed?
Originally posted by Good Wolf
reply to post by badmedia
and why would such a deception be needed?
Deception may not be intentional. Most illusions are incidental and are instances of the limitations of our perception.
Getting back to it, we can choose to act on something, but that doesn't make it a free act or free will. As I said, choices are logical processes, so they follow causality, so are deterministic and therefore are not freewill.
The illusion happens when you decide to equate choice and freewill.
How do you decide(choose) to equate it to choice and freewill? To decide is to choose.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
reply to post by badmedia
How do you decide(choose) to equate it to choice and freewill? To decide is to choose.
Very astute of you. You equated them when you defined freewill with excess "choice".
en.wikipedia.org...
Choice consists of the mental process of thinking involved with the process of judging the merits of multiple options and selecting one of them for action.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
Classical determinism says
If a free action is defined as one that is not predetermined by prior causes, then determinism, which claims that human actions are predetermined, rules out the possibility of free actions.
Only to you. Because it does not suit your beliefs.
When free acts/will is redefined, then it becomes a completely different discussion, one which I need not mention.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
Your twisting these simple concepts to make them fit together. So much so that you're not talking about freewill or omniscience any more. If what we do is predictable, even to God, our actions are based on cause and effect. If that's true then our will is not free but deterministic, limited to reactions to environmental ques. Not free.
Originally posted by atlasastro
How could it start it? Why was there a possibility that something could come from nothing, yet the reverse possibility, that the nothing continues without a something spontaneously erupting is non-preventable.
Originally posted by atlasastro
How did the nothing have a law that said it could not prevent something coming from itself, the nothing? If nothing cannot prevent something then its not nothing, its a something unable to stop something else coming from itself, apparently a nothing, but with an inability to prevent something.
Originally posted by atlasastro
Nice to see the usual suspects, GW, ToothParadox.
Originally posted by badmedia
But after my programming experiences where I have to program all the choices and things a program does, it is huge. You can't get a program to make a choice at all. The closest thing you can do is generate a pseudo random number and then have it select a preformed choice based on the number generated. In which case you have a 10% of 1 reaction, 20% of another reaction and on up.
Originally posted by badmedia
The funny thing to me is that the argument the atheists are using is actually a scenario in which there has to be a god/creator to things. If they are a program or result of creation, then there has to be a creator.
Originally posted by badmedia
If there were no god, then we being conscious beings of the universe are god. Of course, as I don't remember creating everything, then that also hints to the fact that there is a higher intelligence to things, even if it were just a deeper part of my consciousness(which we are all connected to in soul). And thus we have the father and son relationship.
Originally posted by jackflap
I have to get this out and onto the post. Think for a minute. You once again are that all powerful being we are arguing about. You have need of nothing. You know the consequences of what you are about to do quite well. You see all the implications and difficulties man will endure. You are about to bring into existence a chain of events that only you can see from the beginning to the end. There is nothing that you cannot accomplish and what you will, will be done. Knowing this all...The beginning to the end you create...To reassure man that you know what is going on and there is a plan and purpose to his existence you make sure that he gets a book to explain your plan and why things are the way they are now. And you tell them how it will end. To re-assure them more you send your son at a moment in their time to bring them hope and show them how to live. I don't know it seems like a really huge plan you have there.
Originally posted by Grandma
reply to post by John Nada
Hello John Nada:
I really do not believe you would like your brain taken out of your body and placed somewhere you could live forever.
I do not need to jump at the chance to live forever, I believe my Creator and Lord, when he tells me that he is making a home for me in heaven. I believe in an afterlife. So, I will live forever. Yes, you are saying it if by faith that I believe this, but it through faith that we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.
I am sorry that someone put a cat in the microwave. That was not because of God not caring about that animal. It was because the heart of the boy was hard and uncaring. I know God is trying to reach out to that boy.
The same of what happened at your friends wedding. That was terrible and I feel for them, on their special day. But, God was rejoicing on their union together, he didn't cause this bad thing to happen. We live in the world and the Bible tells us that Satan is the prince of this world.
The Universe is a beautiful creation. One that man is still searching for answers to how it all works. Something was made out of nothing. And that something needed a Creator.
Please read Psalms 139:13-16
Only to you. Because it does not suit your beliefs.
A compatibilist, or soft determinist, in contrast, will define a free act in a way that does not hinge on the presence or absence of prior causes.