It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thrustbucket
The OP's avatar is pretty telling just how far gone he is with the conspiracy theories...
I have read and watched tons of stuff about 9/11 theories. I've even had personal email conversations with Dr Jones about WTC 11.
I've seen plenty to suggest that the official story about 9/11 is full of holes and likely wrong. But I've seen nothing but circumstantial and agenda driven emotional evidence to suggest the government or bush or any particular entity is to directly blame.
It's easy to point out there is something fishy. So far nobody has shown proof of who and why.
[edit on 18-2-2009 by thrustbucket]
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by matrixNIN11
Proof the Neos working at pentagon 10 years ago when they specifically
installed cameras that can only focus on cars coming into a carpark and
record only 1 frame a second. So they must have antisipated a plane
crashing into the building could not have been recorded.
Yip, this is proof positive of stupidity gone astray.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by 31337
31377...I KNOW how big the Pentagon is...I SAW it, as I drove past, after 9/11
I SAW the damage....not damage a simple missile could do....unless it was loaded with thousands of gallons of jet fuel!!!
Hope you're OK....
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by weedwhacker
Thanks for the calculations, Weed. That amount of fuel would be about a fuel truck or fuel trailer load.
No cruise missile is capable of carrying this amount of fuel. The best airborne platform to deliver this amount of fuel at 400+ mph would be a large commercial aircraft.