I had not heard this one yet.

do a google search for "Tactical nano-Nukes"

Interesting.

Originally posted by Oolon
do a google search for "Tactical nano-Nukes"

Ehm, two hits on Icke's forum, one on ATS and one on Pravdas forum...

Okaaay...

From a demolitions standpoint, with prior weakening of the load bearing members realtively low-yield explosives could be used take down the building.
Most low-yield packages don't create large sonic booms, especially if used somewhat underground.

Basically what I'm trying to say is there isn't need for the use of a device like this to bring that building down in short and silent order with the correct prep work in place.

Yeah, I ment Thermate.
Seems like you got what I ment anyway...

What about Thermate, regular explosives, and a hell of a lot of mass pushing down from above?

Still thinking you are crossing the river for water... But hey, you seem pretty into this stuff so I rest my case unil furthur notice.

But don't come to me with "expanding horizons" mind you.
I used to believe the "official" story for quite some time! Even took me until recently to understand how this most, or, more likely was a "CD".

Would not the area, or at least the debris be radioactive?
Or maybe you have info on that as well? (serious question)

I will let all you humans know the truth.

Nano-nuclear bombs sound highly unreasonable, both in cost and effect, smaller tactical nuclear warheads are a reality though, and on direct impact to midtown manhattan would reduce new york to a four borough city on the map instantly, as radioactive fallout blows east out to sea, potentially making most of long island, connecticut, and the eastern tri-state/metro area inhospitable for roughly half a century.

The best evidence to support federal government involvement in these attacks is also the best evidence the federal government has to defend it's innocence.

1. how many planes were hi-jacked in total the morning of 9/11/2001?

2. how many planes were "unofficially intercepted" by F-16's before reaching their final targets?

MOST IMPORTANT
3. how do 4+ commercial airliners cancel scheduled flight paths and make it to three of their unintended targets, before being questioned by air traffic control, or ultimately intercepted.

4. how do formaly c.i.a. funded islamic radicalists dwelling in caves with leftover U.S. made stinger anti-air missiles develop such a well planned attack that the wipe out the three buildings containing the only hard documents recording 90% of total debts exported and imported to the U.S.

and here, all along, we thought they just wanted to kill people, why else would they destroy the center of western finance, and then cripple our physical defenses. Judging by the state of our economy now, it looks like Mr. Bin Laden took the first two rounds versus Uncle Sam, and we still can't throw punches back at him, because....well we gotta find him first.

Final Question:

How do you catch a former C.I.A. trained, funded, and armed asset called the taliban after you just spent a decade teaching them how not to get caught by the Russians while shooting down Russian supply choppers bring freshly purchased munitions to Iran?

Now ask yourself if we would of been better off just letting the Russians slaughter thousands of afghanies in retaliation, undenounced, while we simply stopped giving them weapons to fight the Russians back with?

Wait we did... ahhh... so when a man's entire village is leveled by Russian Hind choppers, he might have all the time in the world to come up with a good plan to exact revenge.

So yes, you could say our Federal Government did have an indirect and crucial influence on members of Al Qaeda (an extremist's offshoot of the larger Taliban faction) that carried out these attacks.

Originally posted by n1zzzn
From a demolitions standpoint, with prior weakening of the load bearing members realtively low-yield explosives could be used take down the building.
Most low-yield packages don't create large sonic booms, especially if used somewhat underground.

Basically what I'm trying to say is there isn't need for the use of a device like this to bring that building down in short and silent order with the correct prep work in place.

so please offer some explanation for the vaporization, dustification, and pulverization or whatever you want to call it of nearly the entire towers structural material including STEEL and concrete. Kind of odd as well with all this VAPORIZATION taking place, so much PAPER didn't. Have you looked into how much WATER vaporized?

explain the incredible ENERGY release going on.

explain the widespread CANCER related illnesses.

This black OP was much more than a mere CD.

Why and How? I have no idea... but to say it can't exist or that there was no need for it to be used when evidence exists that shows/reveals anything but just a typical CD, is silly and close-minded imo.

to me, whats interesting about 911 is the amount of and implications of the questions that the evidence raises whether it can be explained or not by known science or technology.

are you saying the military has never or would never use or experiment with advanced tech thats not been officially confirmed?

Please tell me you don't think that.

Now of course i agree thats not conclusive proof i'm right or you're wrong, but I just don't see how any reasonable person can look at the "collapses" let alone all the other evidence in full context and imply its all a coincidence or the issue on how the towers came down is BLACK AND WHITE.

I submit there are so many dynamics involved that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface on nor begin to comprehend yet.

I love it...

The real world is the one of YOUR making...

You think it is true so it is... Along the lines of Jews are control the money because of the supposed long list of Jews running banks or Christianity is simply stolen ideas from previous civilizations.


You did not answer the question...Why are you not displaying anger for why radical jihadis decided that innocent Americans must die as a response to supposed wrong done by America?

Why is America the bad one? Please answer that question if you want to live in your real world?

Wow, is that an incoherent post.

America tricked the Germans and Japan into world war?

I THINK your final sentence is "America is as bad as it is."

OK...

I disagree...

America has never kept a country it has invaded; we are a nation of fighters not occupiers.

America has spent more money in Africa then all other nations combined.

America has been the economic engine for the world since WW1 in money and moral leadership.

America is still the nation everyone in the world wants to emmigrate to.

America is the worlds best and greatest hope.

Please do not respond with a list of wrongs for which you will blame America...it is trite and boring to blame America first.

You have your opinion and I have mine.