It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Britguy
Hey! We put them / drove them there.
After so many years now in Afghanistan (longer than WWII) fighting the Taliban, can someone tell me why we are there again?
The Taliban were content to stay in Afghanistan before we went marching in. Like the Soviets before us we are being mired down in a pointless and costly war of attrition with no clear goals in sight.
The cost keeps going up. More people die every day. The Opiate production went up to record levels and has remained high. Just what the hell are we doing there and, more importantly, why should I care?
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Originally posted by solidshot
The downside to going into Pakistan will be the problem it causes here in the UK, in my town alone 20% of the population is of Pakistani decent and if we do invade there will be blood on the streets, this area is already infultrated by the militants (two of the liquid bombers came from here)
But this could be exactly what the forces that be want.... Allow a little trouble, call in the police riot squads when things get nasty, declare a state of emergency, enforce draconian law and start impounding the immigrants into camps, all fully hyped up by the media.
Scenes from 'Children of men' spring to mind.
People do seem to think that the other 80% of Britain will sat back and do nothing when the SHTF, but i doubt it. I think maybe popularity will grow of for far-right political parties like the BNP.
Either way it's adreadful thought and i don't know what i fear more.
Backward Radical muslims, a full enforced police state or a country suddenly swayed to the far right.
Originally posted by Britguy
Nobody seems to have anything to say other than tough talk about killing Pakistanis and Afghans.
Does anyone know why we are there? All the reasons previously spouted by our governments can, I think, safely be ignored as nothing more than bluster and grandstanding. What are we there for? It's a simple question, surely the answer can't be too complicated, can it?
As far as I can see we have only made things even worse in this region since we financed and armed what was to become the Taliban to fight the Soviets. This seems to be a repeated theme across the world though. Create the enemy that you will someday persuade the peopel you have to deal with.
I don't see hordes of Taliban appearing over the horizon as I sit at home sipping a cuppa, waving their long knives in the air and baying for the beheading of my neighbours for being infidel unbelievers. In short, they are not really high on my list of threats, especially without an Air force, Navy or even a mechanised army to get here.
The longer we remain, the worse it'll get and the more anti-western feeling we create with the weekly missile attacks that always kill innocents as well as the claimed insurgents. Maybe I'm wrong but I see all this as nothing more than deliberate agitation to escalate conflict.
Originally posted by Sestias
So bin Laden could be in the Swat Valley and we wouldn't even know it. Or be able to get to him.
There are no really good options for the U.S. We cannot invade Pakistan because they are supposedly our allies and mostly because they have nuclear weapons. Our campaign to win hearts and minds isn't working.
Great Britain and Russia have both tried to establish empires in Afghanistan and both were defeated. What makes us think we can do any better?
The U.S. should have supported the Russians when they were there, but our cold war mentality wouldn't have allowed that.
Another option is for Turkey to invade Afghanistan, but that's a long shot.
The U.S. is between a rock and a hard place.
Originally posted by nenothtu
See, there's the problem - an "ally" doesn't willingly provide sanctuary to an enemy. Ergo, I think their "ally" status should be re-checked.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Obama is sending between 12 and 17 thousand more troops to Afghanistan.
And at the same time, the towel-ban has basicly been given a 100 mile piece of Pakistan.
So, they will leave afghanistan and go to their safe haven in Pakistan.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by munkey66
Well that seems to be the case since 9/11. We have been in both locations shortly after and have been there ever since, Honestly I don't see how moving East can make us a bigger threat to Iran isn't that in the opposite direction?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by nenothtu
Great point I keep hearing that the US help create the Taliban but in fact back in the day we helped the mujaheddin and pashtun I believe that's what they were called? Anyway the Taliban came later and yes some were former Soviet fighters who joined up later and yes I'm sure some of them were trained by the US.