A Question of Time, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 12:40 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by constantwonder



Sounds interesting CW!

How long does the vid run for? I only ask because I'm stuck on a draconian 56k dial-up *sniff*

IRM


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 12:46 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by constantwonder



Bummer, a bit too long for my connection

Hey, feel free to talk all day! I find it fascinating too. Give it your best shot

Heheh!

IRM


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:02 AM by constantwonder
where to start lol. . . . It really all depends on which model of physics you subsribe to. If einstein had it right then all of space exists right now which means all of time also exsists now and we merely see a 3 dimensional cross section of our four dimensional life. In other words you exisist at this moment at the moment of your birth, the moment of your death and at every single point inbetween.

I find this interpritation troubling because it takes us back to the newtonian world where everything is pre-determined. . . no free will we just coast along a pre set path through time and space.

This is where it gets interesting. . . in quantum physics depending on which theory turns out to be correct time could be interperated in a couple of ways. . . one way is the branching river where decisions made by you chance and the actions of others causes time to branch every quantum fluctuation creates an entirely new timeline so you can exsist in multiple states on multiple time lines simultaneously.

Again this is troubling to me because doesnt that mean i may not be the whole of me which timeline is me is your essence the same in each timeline. . . what if the timelines cross what if i die in one do i live on in another?

Which brings us to my favorite theory on how time works. . . Which is the one described in the video and is popular amongst the string/m-theory camp. It says that time grows out from the past into the future. . . Time and space are granular and as new time and space piles up on top of the new we experience the progression of time. . . To me this is the most comforting theory as it places our future back into our hands no preset path no branching of time to muddle your brain and make you crazy thinking about it (lol).

Anyways we need a more complete theory of gravity before we can try and truly define what time is. Super massive objects distort space and so necissarily time is also warped it slows down near the massive object. Why? well we dont know why because we dont what it is that gives mass therefor we have no real idea of why it effects time. The two are inextricably linked. We just need the rest of the gravity puzzle

lets cross our fingers for the boys at cern


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:24 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by MR1159



I like your explanation MR1159! I agree that time appears malleable as far as the conscious awareness of it is concerned. Is there an etymological link between the temporal lobe and temporal mechanics.. I always assumed there was but admittedly, I've been too lazy to ever look it up. (Naughty IRM.)

IRM

[edit on 18/2/09 by InfaRedMan]


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:27 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by constantwonder



Hmmm, that's really interesting. Time as a layer cake! Sounds delicious too!

You've given me a lot to consider... which is best not done on an empty stomach. I'll think about this over tea and get back to you soon! Thanks for your valuable input my friend!

IRM



reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:29 AM by zazzafrazz
reply to post by InfaRedMan



sorry about the shirt babe! Im here to make you laugh at me


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:51 AM by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
reply to
post by InfaRedMan



sorry about the shirt babe! Im here to make you laugh at me


You're forgiven honey bunch!

I will admit that I'm somewhat a conservative 'old schooler' when it comes to things such as Astrophysics etc. However, I'm prepared to change my mind when satisfactory evidence for the theories are solidified. There's still a lot of transient numbers on the blackboard.

IRM


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:54 AM by quango
Originally posted by constantwonder
If einstein had it right then all of space exists right now which means all of time also exsists now and we merely see a 3 dimensional cross section of our four dimensional life. In other words you exisist at this moment at the moment of your birth, the moment of your death and at every single point inbetween.

in quantum physics . . . one way is the branching river where decisions made by you chance and the actions of others causes time to branch every quantum fluctuation creates an entirely new timeline so you can exsist in multiple states on multiple time lines simultaneously.

Again this is troubling to me because doesnt that mean i may not be the whole of me


I see it as a combination of these two.

Take the first part you mention - all we see is a 3 dimensional cross-section of our 4th dimensional life. Now take that 4th dimension life and plop it down in the river of branching time. That 4th dimension lifeline is just a cross-section of our 5th dimension existence. Here, there are branches all along the length that 4th dimension lifeline which represent choices, chance, etc. Taken in total they represent our lifeline branching into every possible outcome and then branching again and again and again.

To me, it returns free will and doesn't leave us in a pre-determined world. Every possible scenario exists in potential, but only our choices here in the 3rd dimension determine what becomes our experienced reality.

Or, you know, something like that.


reply posted on 19-2-2009 @ 02:03 AM by zazzafrazz
reply to post by dragonridr



God you were so much better at saying it than me....
moving through possiblities...excellent stuff.




reply posted on 24-2-2009 @ 12:01 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by rekar



Good points mate! However, if you read the posts before your own, you will see that these theories have already been discussed.

IRM


reply posted on 24-2-2009 @ 06:48 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Bhadhidar



Interesting Bhadhilar. I felt this way when I was young... not so much the string of pearls thing but thoughts where the universe was just a space where things happened. Kind of a neutral canvas. Through my teens, I thought of time as a man made construct to calibrate existence. Of course I was scoffed at by friends who would point to their watch and say "What's this then?"

I got into a deep conversation with a gentleman one day when I was at work - and he turned out to be a physicist. He didn't laugh at the idea when I ran it by him which lead me to think that it may be closer to the truth than I had imagined.

Still, theories are like a-holes.... everyones got one! I remain rather neutral as far as theories on time are concerned. Sure, we can still use it as a measurement but I don't discount that it may be illusory.

I'd like to hear more about this theory you have shared with us though. Any references you can throw our way... websites, books, DVD's etc.

IRM

[edit on 24/2/09 by InfaRedMan]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^