It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 will be small change in comparison.

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 08:43 PM
link   
On Al-Jazeera TV, Kuwaiti Prof Suggests a Biological Attack on White House, Prays for Bombing of Nuclear Plant on Lake Michigan

No. 2247 - February 16, 2009

www.memrijttm.org...


Following are excerpts from a speech by Kuwaiti Professor Abdallah Al-Nafisi, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on February 2, 2009. Abdallah Al-Nafisi: "Four pounds of anthrax – in a suitcase this big – carried by a fighter through tunnels from Mexico into the U.S., are guaranteed to kill 330,000 Americans within a single hour, if it is properly spread in population centers there. "What a horrifying idea. 9/11 will be small change in comparison. Am I right? There is no need for airplanes, conspiracies, timings, and so on. "One person, with the courage to carry four pounds of anthrax, will go to the White House lawn, and will spread this 'confetti' all over them, and then will do these cries of joy. It will turn into a real 'celebration.' This report will be available exclusively to paid subscribers to MEMRI’s Jihad and ***Terrorism Threat Monitor tomorrow morning. This report will be available exclusively to paid subscribers to MEMRI’s Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor tomorrow morning.




posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 08:57 PM
link   
Tomorrow? The president will be at the Denver Science Museum.



Just a natural coincedence.

I suppose



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Didn't see mention of the nuke plant in Michigan, could you please post refrences of that as well?

Second line - um, thanks for the post.



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 09:00 PM
link   
What the hell is this, and is this credible? Why is this nowhere else? How have they come upon this information? Is this site linked to terrorism/terrorist threats?



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 09:15 PM
link   
I don't know if I want to go check out that source link...

One thing throws me off, and it was:


This report will be available exclusively to paid subscribers to MEMRI’s Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor tomorrow morning.


Paid subscribers eh? It not like we don't get enough high hopping floomy doom gloom these days on regular TV, let alone here.


Yes 9/11 was bad
Yes it could be worse.



No thanks, though...
they can keep the madness.
T-



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 09:30 PM
link   
I got the impression he was suggesting a possible scenario, not stating its going to happen



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 09:47 PM
link   
I think the scenario presented here by the Prof is completely possible, however I doubt if it will ever happen, as major spots in cities in US like train stations, bus terminals, malls etc have facilites to detect anthrax. And forget about getting close to White House with a suitcase, seems impossible to me. I can visualise the terrorists taking an aerial route though, that has potential to cause a lasting damage.

But mind you US has been prepared for this for a long time now, since 9/11



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:45 PM
link   
reply to post by sunny_2008ny
 


Unless the U.S. is behind it...

Remember ALL major events in the world are inside jobs.

WW1, WW2, 9/11, etc.



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by sunny_2008ny
I think the scenario presented here by the Prof is completely possible, however I doubt if it will ever happen, as major spots in cities in US like train stations, bus terminals, malls etc have facilites to detect anthrax. And forget about getting close to White House with a suitcase, seems impossible to me. I can visualise the terrorists taking an aerial route though, that has potential to cause a lasting damage.

But mind you US has been prepared for this for a long time now, since 9/11


Prepared what? every single report I have seen has given subpar if not failing grades to every city for every kind of terrorist act.

The money was wasted on corrupt actions and politics. If something was to go down (god forbid) the US would not be prepared to minimize casualties.



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 12:42 AM
link   
The scenario suggested in the OP's post isn't very practical and would probably kill 0 - 3 people. The world's worst governments all have spent a lot of money trying to weaponize anthrax. It's not that easy to do and requires specialized delivery systems to work.



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 12:49 AM
link   
Yhea right, they are trying to get you to pay for membership... Not exactly credible IMO



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 12:56 AM
link   
Another false threat..
Of course unless it is the USA behind such acts.. As someone mentioned earlier.

[edit on 17-2-2009 by antmax21]



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by jthomas
On Al-Jazeera TV, Kuwaiti Prof Suggests a Biological Attack on White House, Prays for Bombing of Nuclear Plant on Lake Michigan

Right, sure...

Has he been cleared by the Cocaine Importers Agency to authorise the threat? He wouldn't want to speak out of turn, without official approval.



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Now_Then
Yhea right, they are trying to get you to pay for membership... Not exactly credible IMO


You didn't bother to read carefully. That section is a separate fee-based section of the far larger - and free - www.memri.org...

Memri.org specializes in translating the Arabic: "BRIDGING THE LANGUAGE GAP BETWEEN THE MIDDLE EAST AND THE WEST." It is the respected go-to place for translations of all manner of Arabic political and terrorist pronouncements, including those from bin Laden that the 9/11 truth Movement is famous for ignoring and denying.

You can spend months going through the archives if you have any interest in learning what the 9/11 Truth Movement has been determined to deny all these years.

Will you?



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by jthomas
including those from bin Laden that the 9/11 truth Movement is famous for ignoring and denying.
You can spend months going through the archives if you have any interest in learning what the 9/11 Truth Movement has been determined to deny all these years.

September 16, 2001: Bin Laden, in Statement Read on Al Jazeera, Denies Involvement in 9/11 Attacks

September 28, 2001: Bin Laden Again Denies Involvement in 9/11 Attacks

December 26, 2001: Bin Laden Again Denies 9/11 Involvement

jthomas would have people forget about the above 3 times that Bin Laden denied having anything to do with the attacks until three years later:

October 29, 2004: In Speech Released Just Prior to US Elections, Bin Laden Criticizes President Bush and Takes Credit for 9/11 Attacks for First Time

www.historycommons.org...

jthomas would also have people forget or deny that Bin Laden is also not wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. When asked why, the FBI stated that they have "no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11".


On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”


www.teamliberty.net...

If the government didn't have enough hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to “smoke him out of his cave?”

The Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was "Public Enemy Number One" and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11?

Add this on top of all the other facts that show that 9/11 was an inside job.

[edit on 17-2-2009 by _BoneZ_]



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 07:13 PM
link   

posted by jthomas

On Al-Jazeera TV, Kuwaiti Prof Suggests a Biological Attack on White House, Prays for Bombing of Nuclear Plant on Lake Michigan


*SNIP*

Come on jthomas, you know as well as we do that Al Jazeera is a CIA mouthpiece. They are on the same side you are on. These are just more scare tactics from the same old 9-11 perps so they can frighten the American sheeple a bit more.

If things work out right, they can pull off another 9-11 INSIDE JOB Attack on America, and YOU can bravely defend those same perps again. You won't be out of a job after all jthomas.

*SNIP*




[edit on 2/17/09 by SPreston]


Mod edit: Removed off topic graphics. Please stay on topic.

[edit on 2/19/2009 by Hal9000]

[edit on 2/19/2009 by Hal9000]



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

jthomas would have people forget about the above 3 times that Bin Laden denied having anything to do with the attacks until three years later:


Point to where I said anything of the sort.


October 29, 2004: In Speech Released Just Prior to US Elections, Bin Laden Criticizes President Bush and Takes Credit for 9/11 Attacks for First Time

www.historycommons.org...


Oh! You mean bin Laden took credit for it??? Gosh....

Now, which statements of bin Laden do you believe?



Well, I know which Arabs the 9/11 Truth Movement believed:

memri.org...

Hook, line, and sinker.



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by SPreston

[edit on 2/17/09 by SPreston]


You really ought to pay attention to what our President Obama told you. See my sig for the details.



posted on Feb, 17 2009 @ 09:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by jthomas
Now, which statements of bin Laden do you believe?

Certainly not the ones that were faked after his death in December 2001:


September 12, 2007: Some Problems with Possible New Bin Laden Video Noted by Analyst

Problems with a recently released video featuring a man thought to be Osama bin Laden surface. In particular, the 26-minute recording only contains two short sections where the man said to be bin Laden is seen talking. The first covers the initial two minutes of the tape, the second begins after around twelve and a half minutes and lasts for about 90 seconds. The remaining 23 minutes of the tape show only a still image of the speaker. There are also many audio and video splices in the tape and the two live sections appear to be from different recordings, as the desk in front of bin Laden is closer to the camera in the second section.

Analyst Neal Krawetz says, “the new audio has no accompanying ‘live’ video and consists of multiple audio recordings… And there are so many splices that I cannot help but wonder if someone spliced words and phrases together. I also cannot rule out a vocal imitator during the frozen-frame audio. The only way to prove that the audio is really bin Laden is to see him talking in the video.” Krawetz will also note the similarities with bin Laden’s previous video, released just before the 2004 US presidential election (see October 29, 2004): “[T]his is the same clothing [a white hat, white shirt and yellow sweater] he wore in the 2004-10-29 video. In 2004 he had it unzipped, but in 2007 he zipped up the bottom half. Besides the clothing, it appears to be the same background, same lighting, and same desk. Even the camera angle is almost identical.” Krawetz also comments, “if you overlay the 2007 video with the 2004 video, his face has not changed in three years—only his beard is darker and the contrast on the picture has been adjusted.” [NEWS(.COM), 9/12/2007]

However, most of the Western news coverage about the video fails to point out that most of the video is a still image. [CNN, 8/8/2007; NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, 9/7/2007; BBC, 9/8/2007]

Gee, what a surprise. The corporate media fails to mention that all the Osama bin Laden "confession videos" have been faked.



posted on Feb, 19 2009 @ 09:36 AM
link   
reply to post by GoldenFleece
 
OOPS..................
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story. Nicely done GoldenFleece.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join