It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Asian investors won’t buy debt and mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until they carry explicit U.S. guarantees, similar to those given on bonds issued by Bank of America Corp. or Citigroup Inc.
The risks are too great without a pledge that the U.S. will repay the debt no matter what, according to Hideo Shimomura, chief fund investor in Tokyo for Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management Co., and other bondholders and analysts in Japan, China and South Korea interviewed by Bloomberg. Overseas resistance may hamper U.S. efforts to hold down home-loan rates and rebuild the nation’s largest mortgage-finance companies.
Even after President Barack Obama vowed on Feb. 18 to sink as much as $400 billion of capital into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, double the original commitment, “there is still a concern that there is no guarantee” from the government, said Shimomura, who oversees $4 billion in non-yen bonds for the arm of Japan’s largest bank.
“Looking at the risk, they’re not so attractive,” he said. “We need a guarantee before we’ll buy.”
Foreign investors sold $170 billion of agency debt and securities in the second half of 2008, the largest amount since the Treasury began tracking sales in 1977, according to the most recent data. Asians, the biggest non-U.S. block of owners in the category, unloaded $70 billion worth from July through December, after scooping up $55 billion in the second quarter and being net buyers during much of the last decade.
The sell-off and calls for a guarantee reflect a continuing lack of confidence among foreign investors five months after the U.S. seized control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The takeovers followed the biggest surge in mortgage defaults in three decades.
Originally posted by redhatty
reply to post by Power_Semi
It's not enough that the banks charge US for the honor of holding our money, now they want us to pay for their bad business decisions too.
Screw that
Originally posted by redhatty
reply to post by Power_Semi
Hate to tell ya, but the economies are already destroyed.
Maybe on your side of the pond Bank Nationalization is a popular idea, but here in the colonies, we don't want that. We'd rather see them FAIL and have to write off the bad debt through the bankruptcy and restructuring process than stick the taxpayer with even 1 more cent of the cost.
We are kinda funny about that. Ya know...
It's not enough that the banks charge US for the honor of holding our money, now they want us to pay for their bad business decisions too.
Screw that
Originally posted by ::.mika.::
reply to post by DangerDeath
well the change of "enron" aren't exactly big bang, more like mutation of structure of society
(although we could say that the big bang theory is also a mutation)
btw, is reinhardt insinuating that the change is schedule on the 15th March ? the big day ?
An Exchange Platform will cut out the banks altogether… [Chinese Premier] Wen delivered his speech in Davos and went straight to Berlin where they put the final touch on the new world currency basket, sponsored by Berlin-Moscow-Beijing-Tokyo-Riyadh. Moscow and Berlin already have a massive counter trade / barter trade agreement in place, and Beijing was eager to joint that platform as well.” The new global currencies are planned for launch in January 2010. They will be launched amidst growing chaos
After speaking at the World Economic Forum, where he echoed the criticism laid out by Putin, he went on an important trip across Europe. Wen traveled to four major European capitals, whose significance is enormous. He met with Swiss leaders in Bern, with German leaders in Berlin, with Spanish leaders in Madrid, and with European Union leaders in Belgium. One should interpret this not as an endorsement of the status quo, as reported by the US press media, but rather as an announcement of the new structure to conform to the Putin Blueprint for a Post-US World
How much lower can it go?
I have it on good authority that there is very strong support of stock prices at zero, and if you look at charts of Bank of America (closed under $4 today), Citibank (closed under $2.50), Wells Fargo (closed at $12.01), Fifth-Third ($1.21), SunTrust ($6.70) along with dozens more you will find that all of them are in fact racing directly towards that very heavy support right at that zero boundary. Many of these stocks have been cut in half or more in the last two weeks.
PS: If the market crashes tomorrow and into Monday due to your lack of a plan you own it - and the economic destruction that comes from it - Mr. President. Your StimUseless bill will be dwarfed - a crash into next week will easily cost America five million jobs within six to twelve months. You can bet I wil call you on it in public and print up T-Shirts with a nice chart of the index along with your name and a great big FAIL emblazoned on it, just as I did for Paulson and Bush after the EESA was passed.
Good luck sirs.
I think you're gonna need it.
Originally posted by DangerDeath
And if Americans don't want it and American Government is doing just that, what is it?