intelligent Design is More than "God did it.", page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 07:31 AM by iWork4NWO
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by iWork4NWO



Stop skirting the question please. Why would a supposedly "perfect" being have to create something that is "perfect"? Where is the natural law that states this? All BS propaganda aside.

[edit on 7-3-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


"And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good."


But it's not very good. In fact it's quite rubbish..

FSM 1 - Bible God 0

[edit on 7-3-2009 by iWork4NWO]


reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 07:34 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by iWork4NWO



Nature works does it not? A self regulating system. I would call that very good. Of course mankind has managed to muck it up. But that is what we are good at after all.
I am not saying there is a higher power. Merely pointing out the holes in your argument.

[edit on 7-3-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]



reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 07:40 AM by iWork4NWO
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by iWork4NWO



Nature works does it not? A self regulating system. I would call that very good. Of course mankind has managed to muck it up. But that is what we are good at after all.
I am not saying there is a higher power. Merely pointing out the holes in your argument.

[edit on 7-3-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


Them asteroids and stuff are a part of nature too, no? It's not impossible that one will come and end all life on Earth. That's not very good, now is it? A very good design would have come with somekind of planetary defence mechanism like a force field or friggin' lasers on the orbit. Their lack points directly to an unintelligent design. FSM was drunk and forgot to place that system there. The intelligent design hypothesis is very flawed indeed.

[edit on 7-3-2009 by iWork4NWO]


reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 07:59 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by iWork4NWO



Considering the fact that life has shown itself to be very hardy indeed and that an astroid has struck the Earth before and life is still here your comment is false.
Not to mention the idea that life only exists on Earth is statistically speaking ludicris.

Planetary defense fields?
Lasers?????
Happening naturally?
You have to be kidding me.



[edit on 7-3-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 08:03 AM by iWork4NWO
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by iWork4NWO



Considering the fact that life has shown itself to be very hardy indeed and that an astroid has struck the Earth before and life is still here your comment is false.
Not to mention the idea that life only exists on Earth is statistically speaking ludicris.

Planetary defense fields?
Lasers?????
Happening naturally?
You have to be kidding me.



[edit on 7-3-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


Just goes to show that we haven't been struct by an asteroid large enough, yet. Clearly this design is not very good and thus if there is a creator behind it, that creator must have been rather unintelligent.


reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 08:09 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by iWork4NWO



It does not show anything, sure it might if one wanted some biased one sided propaganda to shore up an untennable argument. Life is extinquished every day by the gazillions. And Earth is most likely not the only rock with life on it. Rather Earthcentric to believe that Earth is somehow special and if a higher power did exist it would feel inclined to protect Earth from the mechanisms it would have had to have put into place. Not to mention massively illogical.


reply posted on 8-3-2009 @ 04:05 PM by hulkbacker
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by iWork4NWO



Considering the fact that life has shown itself to be very hardy indeed and that an astroid has struck the Earth before and life is still here your comment is false.
Not to mention the idea that life only exists on Earth is statistically speaking ludicris.

Planetary defense fields?
Lasers?????
Happening naturally?
You have to be kidding me.



[edit on 7-3-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


I would say that both Planetary defense fields and Lasers are less complex than a single human being. If "nature", on its own, can conjure us up, I don't see why these things should not be unexpected.

As far as life existing only on earth. I don't think its statistically ludicris, if we are presuming there is no intelligent forces behind its formation. We can't reproduce it in laboratories under controled conditions, so the odds aren't real favorable for life happening spontaneously, in random environments.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



How Are Plants Aware of the World Around Them?
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
The Genesis Code
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Explain Diversity Reloaded
  Posted 10 days ago with 3 member flags
Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags
The carrot (chicken or egg , vegetable version)
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
A theory of proof of a God
  Posted 10 days ago with 2 member flags
Eden: The Double Sided Coin
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
We are all connected with nature and The Universe IMO
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags