It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gottago
Not to be rude, but since you can type and post the question, I assume you went to school in NZ, and they did try to teach you the rudiments of your country's history.
I'd suggest, since you yourself say you haven't the slightest idea why the Queen of England is still nominal head of state of former British colonies, that you start digging around and see if you can find one of your old world history textbooks they tried to make you read, and read it. That will give you the basics.
Then you can move on to more advanced hatred, like she is leader of the NWO and or Illuminati, a shape-shifting reptilian, one of the 13 Luciferian bloodlines, and so on. You will find much to revel in on this site, btw.
History is quite fascinating once you realize that these were actual people doing that "old stuff"--a little empathy helps.
Originally posted by Ownification
The question is, why is she a Queen now not back when British was a colonial power, you get me? I have read history, I know her and her families role but now we have moved on, umm to something called Democracy where you chose your leaders.
Originally posted by crowkey
sir how can you hate the system and not the queen? when the queen is the very figurhead of the system, and the systems, police, prisons ,armies, in fact every means of control known