It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm getting bored of correcting your perpetual mistakes, but no doubt I will keep on trying to 'educate pork'. don't get offended, that last bit is just from a Yorkshire saying, not personal.
Originally posted by AtheiX
This plane is old and less useful than the F-14 (unless AMM knows something I don't)
Why won't they retire it like they did with F-14?
Originally posted by roniii259
What is replacing the F-14 is a piece of junk. At the air show I went to they had a Super Hornet and the F-14 side by side. The crew dogs which I would have expected to like the new Hornet more expressed their disdain for the new Hornet and nearly wept when they talked about the retirement of the Tomcat. Not all changes are good, expecially since the Tomcat, not the hornet should have been upgraded.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
The F-15 has proven valuable to the United States Air Force for almost 10 years, 101-0 A2A kills, it is undefeated.
yeah because it has not faught any foe that can go past mach 1
So I guess all of those Israeli Mig kills were all against subsonic aircraft? Or the AF kills against Migs, Mirages, and Sukhois in Desert Storm?
[edit on 10/9/04 by COOL HAND]