UFO - meteor like object with sonic boom above Dallas and Austin Texas!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 08:27 PM by C.H.U.D.
reply to post by ziggyproductions05



It's a meteor, or junk... what more do you want to hear? "It could be a UFO" because it came from space?

That's a bit like saying, that car driving down the street could be an 'alien vehicle' because it seems to have all the characteristics of car...

I fail to see the point in putting this in the UFO forum. What self respecting advanced civilization would send a craft all this way from where ever they come from, only to crash into our atmosphere?

Are we going to launch into this same old debate every time a fairly large meteor is seen in our atmosphere, even when there is NOT A SHRED of evidence to suggest anything other than a natural meteor or junk reentry?

This topic is also being discussed in the following threads:
Possible Satellite Debris Falling Across The Region
Breaking News: Two Satellites Collide In Orbit


reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 10:16 PM by ziggyproductions05
Originally posted by C.H.U.D.
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
there have been plenty of ufo crashes


I have yet to see proof that stands up to any scrutiny that even one 'UFO' (if you mean intelligently controlled advanced-propulsion craft) has ever crash landed?

All I am saying, is, the question you asked is leading, and although this is no court of law, there has not been a single scrap of evidence that any UFO (by the above definition) has crashed before, so why start a thread off with a question that leads like this, when there is no evidence here (or before) that anything other than meteors/junk has crashed?

What evidence do you have that this was a UFO and not a meteorite/junk? Booms don't really count, since meteorites/junk can also make them. If there is none, then perhaps you would edit your OP to be a little less leading, please? Thank you.

Roswell? of course there are going to be cover ups, and its not going to be headline news. just look at our advancements in the last 50 years - do you honestly think we havent had one ufo crash in the entire world?? come on - look it up
en.wikipedia.org...:_NASA_changes_story_to_.22Russian_satellite.22

www.youtube.com...

www.ufoevidence.org...

so yeah, they probably wont make headline news because im sure there are government threats made to people, intimidation and what not. check out james gilliland iwebsite www.eceti.org and look at the black helicoptor vids and what he says about them. so yes i believe there have been crashes, but the government just wont come out and say, "yeah we have retrieved crashed UFO's from other planets, taken some technology..oh and have a good day" check out the links. i'll i was trying to do with this thread was see if this could possibly be one of those incidents. does anyone have pictures of the debris that fell to substantiate the fact it is a satellite? if not, its still unidentified. Just because our government says thats what it is, doesnt always mean its true. Someone show me identifiable pics of fallen satellites and ill shutup


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 04:41 AM by damagemouse
Ziggy: Re yr post: Radness

CHUD: Newsday is reporting that the FAA is unable to identify the objects and the US Strategic Command states that the objects were not sattelite debris.

www.newsday.com...

Helicopters have were sent to search for wreckage. Did you guys see the footie on CNN? I did and it the object was rather large to me, but i must admit i am dumb as paint.

If no wreckage found?



reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 05:22 AM by cappuccino
reply to post by Kenan



Uhuh, and you directly believe it when the military denies something...

If it looks like # and smells like # it most likely is #.


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 07:04 AM by C.H.U.D.
reply to post by damagemouse



Agreed,

This, and the other events being reported now are probably natural meteors. Satellite debris would produce extremely slow meteors, and that is not what I'm seeing here.

They're never going to find any wreckage using helicopters. People always seriously underestimate the size of fallen objects, and where they fell. Usually any fallen objects are found by calculating the trajectory from footage/photos/reports, and this takes time.


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 11:01 AM by C.H.U.D.
reply to post by SlinkyDFW



I also noticed this, but without a thorough frame-by-frame analysis, it's going to be hard to confirm. Some people also noticed this effect in the footage from the Canadian event last year, but that fall was tracked down, and was nothing out of the ordinary as far as meteorite falls go.

It's probably an illusion, but well done for spotting it


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 04:06 PM by ufo reality
reply to post by ziggyproductions05



www.cnn.com...

"Early speculation was that it might have been debris from two satellites that rammed into each other. But U.S. Strategic Command said it was not."


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 15 days ago with 60 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 23 member flags