|
|
Topic started on 15-2-2009 @ 06:48 PM by ziggyproductions05
|
Apparently sunday morning in Dallas, Texas to Austin, Texas a meteor like object was spotted, accompanied with a large sonic boom. Could this be UFO
activity/crash? Airforce? Debris from satellite collision? Check it out for yourself here at CNN -
story
www.cnn.com...
video
www.cnn.com...#/video/us/2009/02/15/texas.falling.debris.news8austin
*edit to add video and links
[edit on 15-2-2009 by ziggyproductions05]
[edit on 15-2-2009 by ziggyproductions05]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Aliens and UFOs topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 08:27 PM by C.H.U.D.
|
reply to post by ziggyproductions05
It's a meteor, or junk... what more do you want to hear? "It could be a UFO" because it came from space?
That's a bit like saying, that car driving down the street could be an 'alien vehicle' because it seems to have all the characteristics of
car...
I fail to see the point in putting this in the UFO forum. What self respecting advanced civilization would send a craft all this way from where ever
they come from, only to crash into our atmosphere?
Are we going to launch into this same old debate every time a fairly large meteor is seen in our atmosphere, even when there is NOT A
SHRED of evidence to suggest anything other than a natural meteor or junk reentry?
This topic is also being discussed in the following threads:
Possible Satellite Debris Falling Across The Region
Breaking News: Two Satellites Collide In Orbit
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 08:41 PM by ziggyproductions05
|
hey my friend im just putting it out there for people to see. there have been plenty of ufo crashes - its unidentified, flying, or falling, and its
an object. thats why i put it here. it created a sonic boom, just thought some would be interested. mods delete the thread if you feel the need. have
a nice night chud. 
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 09:26 PM by C.H.U.D.
|
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
there have been plenty of ufo crashes
I have yet to see proof that stands up to any scrutiny that even one 'UFO' (if you mean intelligently controlled advanced-propulsion craft) has ever
crash landed?
All I am saying, is, the question you asked is leading, and although this is no court of law, there has not been a single scrap of evidence that any
UFO (by the above definition) has crashed before, so why start a thread off with a question that leads like this, when there is no evidence here (or
before) that anything other than meteors/junk has crashed?
What evidence do you have that this was a UFO and not a meteorite/junk? Booms don't really count, since meteorites/junk can also make them. If there
is none, then perhaps you would edit your OP to be a little less leading, please? Thank you.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 09:36 PM by Trexter Ziam
|
11:00 A.M. this morning our time (Central Time) in Central Texas ... houses shook, windows rattled and falling satelite debris was spotted and
reported from Mexico to Houston. Sonic booms were reported as well.
I have no doubt, the Austin and Dallas similiarities of the same date and time and description are ALSO satellite wreckage.
No longer "unidentified".
Edit to add reference: www.kbtx.com...
[edit on 15-2-2009 by Trexter Ziam]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 10:16 PM by ziggyproductions05
|
Originally posted by C.H.U.D.
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
there have been plenty of ufo crashes
I have yet to see proof that stands up to any scrutiny that even one 'UFO' (if you mean intelligently controlled advanced-propulsion craft) has ever
crash landed?
All I am saying, is, the question you asked is leading, and although this is no court of law, there has not been a single scrap of evidence that any
UFO (by the above definition) has crashed before, so why start a thread off with a question that leads like this, when there is no evidence here (or
before) that anything other than meteors/junk has crashed?
What evidence do you have that this was a UFO and not a meteorite/junk? Booms don't really count, since meteorites/junk can also make them. If there
is none, then perhaps you would edit your OP to be a little less leading, please? Thank you.
Roswell? of course there are going to be cover ups, and its not going to be headline news. just look at our advancements in the last 50 years - do you
honestly think we havent had one ufo crash in the entire world?? come on - look it up
en.wikipedia.org...:_NASA_changes_story_to_.22Russian_satellite.22
www.youtube.com...
www.ufoevidence.org...
so yeah, they probably wont make headline news because im sure there are government threats made to people, intimidation and what not. check out james
gilliland iwebsite www.eceti.org and look at the black helicoptor vids and what he says about them. so yes i believe there have been crashes, but the
government just wont come out and say, "yeah we have retrieved crashed UFO's from other planets, taken some technology..oh and have a good day"
check out the links. i'll i was trying to do with this thread was see if this could possibly be one of those incidents. does anyone have pictures of
the debris that fell to substantiate the fact it is a satellite? if not, its still unidentified. Just because our government says thats what it is,
doesnt always mean its true. Someone show me identifiable pics of fallen satellites and ill shutup
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 11:31 PM by C.H.U.D.
|
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
Someone show me identifiable pics of fallen satellites and ill shutup
Part of a Russian satellite that fell in NZ:
image source: www.thelivingmoon.com...
news.bbc.co.uk
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 04:41 AM by damagemouse
|
Ziggy: Re yr post: Radness
CHUD: Newsday is reporting that the FAA is unable to identify the objects and the US Strategic Command states that the objects were not sattelite
debris.
www.newsday.com...
Helicopters have were sent to search for wreckage. Did you guys see the footie on CNN? I did and it the object was rather large to me, but i must
admit i am dumb as paint.
If no wreckage found?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 04:53 AM by Kenan
|
I was just about to write it must have been a space junk when I read the millitary denied that. So, my guess is, a meteorite.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 05:22 AM by cappuccino
|
reply to post by Kenan
Uhuh, and you directly believe it when the military denies something...
If it looks like # and smells like # it most likely is #.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 06:46 AM by ziggyproductions05
|
well i guess it isnt even satellites now is it? mods didnt delete this trhead and now it has gotten a bit more interesting.
chud - i meant fallen satellites from this incident. not a year ago.
this is exactly what i thought may happen - none of us can prove what it is so lets keep it going.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by ziggyproductions05]
[edit on 16-2-2009 by ziggyproductions05]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 07:04 AM by C.H.U.D.
|
reply to post by damagemouse
Agreed,
This, and the other events being reported now are probably natural meteors. Satellite debris would produce extremely slow meteors, and that is not
what I'm seeing here.
They're never going to find any wreckage using helicopters. People always seriously underestimate the size of fallen objects, and where they fell.
Usually any fallen objects are found by calculating the trajectory from footage/photos/reports, and this takes time.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 07:09 AM by C.H.U.D.
|
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
chud - i meant fallen satellites from this incident. not a year ago.
Chances are there won't be any, since both satellites suffered such an energetic collision, and what is left will probably mostly be very small
pieces. Much of the mass of the satellites was probably vaporised in the collision.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 07:16 AM by ziggyproductions05
|
well thats why i posted it on the ufo forum. neither of us know exacctly what it is. we have no proof either way. lets just see what happens.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 09:55 AM by SlinkyDFW
|
If I may interrupt the debunking and arguing for a moment.....
Can we talk about the video? Either my eyes are getting older, or, seconds before the object reaches the tree line, it is deflected off course.
Can a meteorite do that? Or something else that is trying to correct it's course?
It's very clear that it's original line of trajectory was altered.
The reporter just concluded a live report with CNN and he mentioned that NASA just contacted the TV station? He mentioned that right after CNN asked
if any governement agency has asked for the video.
Just curious...
Edit: adding original video link from the source in Austin
www.news8austin.com...
[edit on 16-2-2009 by SlinkyDFW]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 10:47 AM by C.H.U.D.
|
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
well thats why i posted it on the ufo forum. neither of us know exacctly what it is. we have no proof either way. lets just see what happens.
We may not know exactly what it is, but that still does not qualify it as a UFO.
If I see a bird flying in the sky, I may not know what species, but it's still a bird and not a UFO.
We know this was probably a natural meteor or junk, anything else is extremely unlikely, since there is no evidence that anything else but
natural meteorites/junk has ever fallen from space.
Lets try and keep it real, please?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 11:01 AM by C.H.U.D.
|
reply to post by SlinkyDFW
I also noticed this, but without a thorough frame-by-frame analysis, it's going to be hard to confirm. Some people also noticed this effect in the
footage from the Canadian event last year, but that fall was tracked down, and was
nothing out of the ordinary as far as meteorite falls go.
It's probably an illusion, but well done for spotting it
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 12:05 PM by Soylent Green Is People
|
Well, since authorities now say it wasn't remnants of the satellites that collided, then the likely answer is that it was perhaps a simple
meteorite.
Until any "out of the oridinary" information or "uncharacteristic of a meteor" information comes to light, then it seems a meteorite is the best
default explanation to begin with.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 03:28 PM by ziggyproductions05
|
Originally posted by C.H.U.D.
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
well thats why i posted it on the ufo forum. neither of us know exacctly what it is. we have no proof either way. lets just see what happens.
We may not know exactly what it is, but that still does not qualify it as a UFO.
If I see a bird flying in the sky, I may not know what species, but it's still a bird and not a UFO.
We know this was probably a natural meteor or junk, anything else is extremely unlikely, since there is no evidence that anything else but
natural meteorites/junk has ever fallen from space.
Lets try and keep it real, please?
im keeping it 100 percent real - your bird theory is well, a bird. we have no idea what this is yet. anyone with good video analasyis skills please
check out the video and see if we can get any enlargments or anything. any idea of where this could have landed as well would be great - this object
looks huge and had to have hit somewhere. if it is a meteor i just want proof, and if its not, lets try to figure out what it is. chud, im done
arguing with you and lets please get to the facts and analaysis done on each end here, please.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 04:06 PM by ufo reality
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
