Ah. So I guess all 'disinfo agents' sprung up in 2003, then; and before that, there was nothing. Question, has the amount of false stories and
debunkers increased since 2003, and do have any evidence they were not kids with too much spare time? And if it is happening, it is very hard to
believe it is widespread... maybe we could do an investigation; of course, you probably don't trust me... essentially we find debunkers and disinfo
agents, and talk to them, on webcam, or maybe in real life. Or maybe someone can find a real example of disinfo agents on ATS? Maybe we could create a
thread about suspected disinfo posts?
You`ve never been lied to here?
No doubt I've been lied to. The question is were they government disinfo agents, or, just plain, boring, kids with too much spare time? I have always
found they're kids with too much spare time, as it has always been shown if you get to know them, that's precisely what they are. Hell, there are
even forums dedicated to conspiracies about ATS itself; and I've never seen much about disinfo agents on them. Weirdest thing I've heard of is
randomly disappearing posts, but they were probably a browser issue.
How would you possibly know U.S. government policy as it relates to psyops, disinfo campaigns or attempts to control information on the
How would you possibly know the U.S. government is posting on ATS as 'disinfo agents'?
It's probably a good idea to actually read the Intel
ops roadmap... www.gwu.edu...
Also, I want to clarify once again that I am speaking of ATS only,
not MIB or any other silencing operations; one only has to look at Minot incident to see that. Also, please provide examples of disinfo on ATS, and
provide with evidence they are government.
Is it similar to how all the evidence from TWA 800 pointed to a center fuel tank explosion? (well, except for traces of explosives residue on a
dozen row of seats and a few hundred people who saw a missile rise up from the eastern seaboard, but I digress.)
Similar to how all evidence from American Eagle Flight 4184 pointed to icing. The similarities it had with Continental Connection Flight 3407 were as
- Similar aircraft configuration.
- Similar de-ice configuration.
- Both in known icing conditions.
- Both aircraft departed controlled flight apon configuration change.
- Both had uncommanded roll and pitch excursions.
- Both aircraft were on autopilot in icing conditions.
And on top of that, the de-ice requirements on said aircraft are for droplet sizes of 40 millimetres, not 200 millimetres as aircraft can
I ask you, what similarities, are there with TWA flight 800, or any other conspiracy? Important people were on board? If you find any proper evidence,
then I will be the first to admit being wrong. Until then, I am done playing games with you on this subject.
Just out of curiosity, why would an Australian care if 9/11 was an inside job or not?
I guess you would ask the 100,000 to 2,000,000 Iraqi's and Afghan's who have been killed the same question. But of course, other countries should
completely stay out of United States politics, despite the United States being clearly EXEMPT from this rule.
Uh, maybe because Australian
soldiers I knew, personally, have been killed on deployments to fight Americas war; based on false premises?
Don't confuse me with 9/11 truth deniers; I will only post on aviation related issues as that's where I can contribute the most; I am not
knowledgable in many areas - so I keep my mouth shut. Therefore, don't get upset when I chime in occasionally catch a fallacy or two, or attempt to
shed some light on an aviation related topic. You don't like my authorative tone? I love it; try using it against debunkers. Outside of the aviation
forum, how would you like me to respond? Do I show traits of disinfo agents? What are they? Just curious...
And why would that Australian spell "defense" the American way?
Possibly for the same reason most Australians spell, 'Gaol', as Jail; the same reason why I spell 'program' as programme, the same reason I spell
sence, sense (or the other way around). If you really are that paranoid, maybe you should be asking, who I work for. Is it ASIO, MI6, CIA? Or maybe I
should include CONTROL, and Quantum?
I have a question for you. Your signature says, "A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government."
My question is
this; what exactly have you done to defend your country against your government? I ask because it seems to me like you're justifying this whole
charade of yours by fighting imaginary disinfo agents over the internet.
Just a thought.
[edit on 18/2/2009 by C0bzz]