It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

“Wake up!” Okay, Okay already ... I’m awake. – Recently enlightened to NWO and other manipul

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 08:50 PM
link   
Hi all. I’ve been on the Net since I had dial-up on my old Apple 2ce in ’89. Mostly I used it as a tool for tutorial info relating to business. Then, found it preferable to the biased TV and newspaper media for current news. And to download porn, of course. (jk)
Current: Armed with the understanding that even with conservative input, the Drake equation is mathematical proof enough for me to believe in extraterrestrial life. Compelling interest in what info there is on UFO’s, aliens and other information (and disinformation) brought me to ATS.
I do not profess to be more, or less intelligent than any one else. The “mental haze” that modern media induces absolutely had me convinced that the conspiracies I was reading about were written by nut jobs and crackpots either looking for attention or just stopped taking their prescribed meds. Even the very word “Conspiracy” evokes a certain, media perpetuated, mental and emotional ‘conditional response’ of abhorrence and discomfort. In other words; a trained response. Remember Pavlov’s pups? It’s just a word they want you to avoid. Good news: Just reading that last sentence, and if needed, saying it out loud will break its spell. Do it now. See? Lost that craving for milkbones didn’t ya?
I’m not formally trained in psychology, communications or literature. Nor hold a higher degree in any particular area. Completely self-taught. What I do have are two profound gifts of my Dad’s legacy: the ability for comprehensive reading from age 2 and what he called his ‘Reporter’s Gene’ defined as ‘the aptitude to satisfy an innate and insatiable curiosity for the truth by; checking and verifying multiple sources, trusting your own ability to reason, understand the simple truth of Occam’s Razor, using the scientific method to try to ‘prove it wrong, not to prove it right’, and boil it all down to its basic, and sometimes heretofore, “latent element.” (hence the nick) As Doyle penned, “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
On a bet for 50 bucks I stopped watching television for 1 month. It was January of 2005 and haven’t used the “idiot’s lantern” since. Its spell has been broken too.
Now, with the unbridled mental perspicacity my newly awaken state as allowed me, I am alarmed to discover the existence and the pervasiveness of the NWO’s influence. I first ignored as ‘baseless hype from the lunatic fringe’ these essays of an entity whose purpose is to amass wealth beyond measure and total control of the masses. I’m now satisfied of the validity to many revealing reports, not ones that are reprocessed from the original, but independent accounts of an organization formed and operating with one purpose in mind: Ultimate control of everything – primarily because they have progressed beyond the point of acquiring wealth as their stimulus to ‘feel alive’. And, coupling that with their lack of belief in an afterlife beyond death, they’ve concluded all they have are the here and now and power over everything on earth is the only thing left to excite them. Ridiculous in its simplicity, isn’t it? Thanks Occam.
Not to say I believe some of the more controversial, even by conspiracy’s standards ‘way out there’, proposals forwarded by some. I still think there are ‘nut jobs’ vying for attention, and stories perpetuated to the point of mythical proportions. For instance, and even thought my ‘over the top’ level of belief has risen dramatically, I don’t subscribe to the reptile bit.

But, Aliens? Oh yeah! NWO? (Of the human variety-albeit greedy ones) Yep. Proven as fact and known to exist.
Where do I go from this perch of edification? Always forward, never straight. (You can’t negotiate curves with a straight line, right?)



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 08:51 PM
link   
I’ll post articles I’ve come across, and unless otherwise noted, will provide independent links to source information.
I do NOT expect you to trust me as a matter of course. Unless, that is, you’re interested in purchasing some prime beachfront property in Arizona (jk).
I do expect, if you are worth your salt, to either verify or discount the information that I, or anyone, relays to you. I use the word “relay” with precision. Unless it is based upon something the OP is PERSONALLY involved in, or has witnessed with others present to verify what he or she writes, than; what you read is a relayed or repeated or conveyed – link or quote or story - of, to or based on the original. Do not, in your haste to believe, fall victim to someone’s manipulation - either intended or not.
You want everyone to see the truth, right?
So do I.
You must realize that perpetuating and sensationalizing the “hearsay factor” undermines the only credibility we may have in exposing the real truth.
So, let’s make sure it IS the truth first. Not speculation, not rumor, “not a voice told me while I was in the shower while I was scratchin’ my ... Back. I was gonna say back. Really ..I was. lol
And don’t take yourself so darn seriously either. If you can’t make a joke, or laugh a little, or smile just because the sun is shining - then what is it about your life that you wish to preserve by fighting the enemy?
In other words, don’t lose your humanity in the fight for humanity. (Disclaimer: Not meant to be a reference to fighting lizards or reptiles or salamanders or their offspring.)
See what I mean? Don’t ‘invent’ some writing between the words when clearly there is none.
Thanks for reading. I wait, embraced for the slamming that may ensue. Or, maybe it won’t. We’ll see.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 11:06 PM
link   
Start with this. Depopulations R Us: www.freerepublic.com...



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 01:55 AM
link   
If you are referring the 'disinformation' and inference that any wrong doing automatically MUST be NWO, then yeah. Prime example.
First, the link on that page to the transcript is broken.
Here's a valid link to it: www.deeppoliticsforum.com...

Dr. Lee was never mentioned in the documentary, but the author 'infers' his involvement, almost as if the Doctor himself was giving the shots and WHO was directly involved, 'smoking gun style'. Read the transcript.
It refers to 'Government Agencies'
Quote -
"DR FAYS SCHRATER: 'If there is a conspiracy to immunise the women of the Philippines with chorionic gonadotropin rather than tetanus, then it requires the knowledge of some member of a government, or two. It requires the participation of a manufacturer to link the chorionic gonadotropin physically to the tetanus toxoid - you can't just throw it in the vial and expect it to do its work. And it requires that it be mislabelled and that it be shipped then to a centre who knows what's in it and who is going to distribute it in a guise of tetanus vaccine. Of course it's plausible and in fact it's probably not all that complicated.'"
The report you've cited states, unequivocally, (Quote) "In 1995 the BBC aired an investigative documentary verified by the Philippine Department of Health and the Philippine Medical Association that tetanus vaccines from the WHO were combined with a chemical known as beta Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, an anti-pregnancy agent."

There was no mention of WHO involvement in the documentary other than the narrator stating,(Quote) "The World Health Organisation has stated that no further Quinacrine research in women is justified until further laboratory tests have been completed."

What happened is a horrendous violation of the rights and personal well being of those subjected to the experimentation. But, the author missed the real story here, and apparently so did you :
(Quote)
"BETSY HARTMANN: It's not just in the United States case the government, but there are also a whole range of private foundations that are funding the building of a population control movement."

Now, THAT should be investigated as possible operational involvement by the NWO, don't you think?.


[edit on 2/14/2009 by LatentElement]

[edit on 2/14/2009 by LatentElement]



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by LatentElement
"DR FAYS SCHRATER: 'If there is a conspiracy to immunise the women of the Philippines with chorionic gonadotropin rather than tetanus, then it requires the knowledge of some member of a government, or two. It requires the participation of a manufacturer to link the chorionic gonadotropin physically to the tetanus toxoid - you can't just throw it in the vial and expect it to do its work. And it requires that it be mislabelled and that it be shipped then to a centre who knows what's in it and who is going to distribute it in a guise of tetanus vaccine. Of course it's plausible and in fact it's probably not all that complicated.'"


So I guess the good doctor has just answered his/her own question.



posted on Feb, 14 2009 @ 10:10 PM
link   
Definitely a conspiracy - No doubt about it. And, I'll bet they've been doing this sort of thing for much longer than anyone suspects.
Maybe we should insist the drug companies hierarchy and their cronies in government subject themselves, personally to drug and product testing before FDA approval.
Think they'd blink?




top topics
 
1

log in

join