It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
This thread makes absolutely no sense !!
Originally posted by Shades1035
Just out of curiousity, why are there so many debunkers on ATS? A conspiracy board with so many people that just think that conspiracies do not exist. That makes no sense? It almost seems like a conspiracy!
Big Increase in Pentagon Budget For Propaganda
Thursday, February 5 2009
By CHRIS TOMLINSON Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- As it fights two wars, the Pentagon is steadily and dramatically increasing the money it spends to win what it calls "the human terrain" of world public opinion. In the process, it is raising concerns of spreading propaganda at home in violation of federal law.
An Associated Press investigation found that over the past five years, the money the military spends on winning hearts and minds at home and abroad has grown by 63 percent, to at least $4.7 billion this year, according to Department of Defense budgets and other documents. That's almost as much as it spent on body armor for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2004 and 2006.
Two members of jazz musician Chuck Mangione's band were among those killed on the plane that crashed into a house near Buffalo, N.Y.
www.allaboutjazz.com...
Originally posted by tuppence2
Some 9/11 theorists call themselves patriots and yet don’t believe one word that comes out of their own government or military.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
This thread makes absolutely no sense !!
Do you always post dozens of times on threads that make no sense?
Originally posted by Shades1035
Just out of curiousity, why are there so many debunkers on ATS? A conspiracy board with so many people that just think that conspiracies do not exist. That makes no sense? It almost seems like a conspiracy!
My guess:
Big Increase in Pentagon Budget For Propaganda
Thursday, February 5 2009
By CHRIS TOMLINSON Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- As it fights two wars, the Pentagon is steadily and dramatically increasing the money it spends to win what it calls "the human terrain" of world public opinion. In the process, it is raising concerns of spreading propaganda at home in violation of federal law.
An Associated Press investigation found that over the past five years, the money the military spends on winning hearts and minds at home and abroad has grown by 63 percent, to at least $4.7 billion this year, according to Department of Defense budgets and other documents. That's almost as much as it spent on body armor for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2004 and 2006.
Here's your chance to support the troops. Just quit posting so the Pentagon can buy more body armor.
[edit on 14-2-2009 by GoldenFleece]
Originally posted by sueloujo
reply to post by jfj123
The bigger the lie the more convincing it is...many 9/11 witnesses have died in supicious circumstances and her being so high profile would only raise too many questions if she was to "die" singly. She was a young, healthy, fit woman. A heart condition or the like wouldnt wear. She was not the sort of person to commit "suicide" ..many questions would be asked there too.
She was pressing hard on Obama for another investigation. It will be interesting to see if any of her fellow "truthers" get anywhere with that.
The wish of a 9/11 widow Posted 12/5/04
A member of the Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 commission, Beverly Eckert, 53, wants "something constructive" to come from the death of her husband, Sean Rooney, in the World Trade Center. After urging Congress to form an investigative commission, Eckert (pictured at a ground zero vigil last week) is now championing intelligence reform legislation that stalled in the House after key Republicans wanted more provisions: no driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, to name one.
Why is there an impasse?
People forget this is a bill about terrorism. You could put countless things in this bill and make a connection to our safety. We need to go one step at a time--and start by reforming the intelligence community. I want to deny terrorists driver's licenses, too, but I want to do that later.
How are you holding up?
If I knew that [after] three years we would still be waiting for intelligence reform, I don't know if I would have signed up. My life feels like that movie Groundhog Day; I'm constantly getting out of a cab in front of the Rayburn House Office Building, trying to get something done.
This photo provided by the White House, taken Friday, Feb. 6, 2009, shows President Barack Obama shaking hands with Beverly Eckert in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus in Washington during a meeting with a group who lost family members in the 9/11 and the USS Cole tragedies. Eckert, a Sept. 11 widow, was on a commuter plane approaching the Buffalo airport Thursday night when it nose-dived into the ground, killing all aboard and one person on the ground. ((AP Photo/White House, Pete Souza))
Afterward, Eckert joined other families in lobbying for creation of the 9/11 Commission. She advocated for improvements to national security. She was a vocal proponent of building a memorial at the World Trade Center site, and spoke out against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "I'm trying to find a new path for myself," Eckert told The Advocate on the first anniversary of the attacks. "The life I led a year ago doesn't exist." Stamford Mayor Dannel Malloy said Eckert worked with the city on various memorial projects. "Beverly was a strong and compassionate voice on behalf of the victims of September 11, and she will be missed in our community," he said.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Just curious, what are your thoughts about 9/11?
If in fact rogue elements of the U.S. government were involved (which a preponderance of evidence strongly suggests), does it dishonor the victims to speak the truth?
If it's even remotely possible that our own government could do something that evil (Operation Northwoods proves they've planned these types of operations since the 1960s), not to mention the entire MSM refusing to question the many 9/11 anomalies, can you really blame anyone for being initially skeptical about every disaster?
Is directing anger and disgust towards what you call the "knee-jerk conspiracists" really a case of shooting the messenger?
Would it perhaps be more appropriate to blame a government whose actions have repeatedly demonstrated that they're incapable of accepting responsibility and telling the truth, even after accidentally shooting down a jetliner like TWA 800? Trust is earned, and based on the last 50 years, there's very little reason to trust anything the government says or does. Same goes for the traitorous corporate media.
Whether Continental 3407 ends up being a conspiracy or not, I think your condemnation is misplaced. Some people seem more focused on condemning those who tell the truth and point out evil rather than the evil itself.
Originally posted by jfj123
The word debunker is used by skeptic is probably more appropriate. Skeptics are willing to believe when evidence is available that the statement is true. What's wrong with that?
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
The word debunker is used by skeptic is probably more appropriate. Skeptics are willing to believe when evidence is available that the statement is true. What's wrong with that?
Nothing wrong with that as long as you can properly evaluate evidence and are truly objective.
For example, there's little or no hard evidence that would make me think this crash is anything more than a weather related accident. There's a few oddities, but nothing that couldn't be partially justified or explained.
But 9/11 is a whole different story. Anyone who seriously investigates the hundreds of crazy anomalies and lack of government transparency (such as a photo of whatever hit the Pentagon) can only come to one conclusion. I doubt you've done much independent research because the entire notion seems highly implausible, even offensive to you. Anyone who openly advocates "support the troops" is probably more of a top-down, hierarchal thinker who doesn't question authority and lacks the capacity for independent analysis.
The ultimate irony is someone who's sigs are "convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies" and "those who would relinquish liberty to gain security, deserve neither and will soon lose both", but doesn't even realize his beliefs directly contradict the spirit of those quotes.
Has it ever occurred to you that the Patriot Act -- which Ron Paul believes was written before 9/11 -- relinquishes far more liberty for "security" than any other legislation in history? Do you really think this was rammed through to protect us against the global bogeyman Osama bin Laden and al-CIAduh? Have you read 1984?
-A Few Good Men- Col. Jessup
Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.
Seriously dewd, wake up to what's happening in America, which is headed perilously close to a bankrupt plutocracy and fascist police state. All because of our 9/11 Reichstag Fire and pseudo-patriots who care more about supporting the troops than supporting the Constitution.