It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Several researchers have investigated the business history of the Bush family. The facts that they have uncovered are not very pretty. The business record of George W. Bush holds some revealing insights to how his presidency has operated, and helps to explain why the country has fallen so deeply in debt and has so many other problems.
Arbusto, an oil exploration company, lost money, but it got considerable investments (nearly $5 million) because even losing oil investments were useful as tax shelters.
Spectrum 7 Energy Corp. bought out Arbusto in 1984 and hired Mr. Bush to run the company's oil interests in Midland, Texas. The oil business collapsed as oil prices plummeted by 1986, and Spectrum 7 Energy was near failure.
Harken Energy acquired Mr. Bush's Spectrum 7 Energy shares, and he got Harken shares, a directorship, and a consulting arrangement in return. Harken, under Bush, brought in Saudi real estate tycoon Sheikh Abdullah Bakhsh as a board member and a major investor. Over the next few years, Harken would turn out to have links to: Saudi money, CIA-connected Filipinos, the Harvard Endowment, the emir of Bahrain, and the shadowy Bank of Credit and Commerce International.
A 1991 internal SEC document suggested George W. Bush violated federal securities law at least 4 times in the late 1980s and early 1990s in selling Harken stock while serving as a director of Harken. This is essentially the same kind of activity that Martha Stewart is going to prison over. Except at the time of the investigation, Mr. Bush's father was president and the case was quietly dropped.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
i believe this title is misleading.
"someone" is screwing up the economy, intentionally, and propagating fear about it too, but it ain't obama or bush alone. both were cfr or otherwise controlled pawns. nothing more or less.
i for one wish many of the people here on this board would STOP making this a partisan issue or using it as a chance to attack the president you didn't vote for. it goes far, far beyond that, and the sooner you all see and accept this, the faster we will all be able to logically consider, thwart, and recover.
that being said, it's ludicrous to even think in your mind that this is in any way a reflection of this current pawn...er..i mean president. the die was cast long, long ago.[edit on 12-2-2009 by ~Lucidity]
Originally posted by Walkswithfish
His words were "I inherited this problem"
BH you know I am an Obama supporter, but this is not at all what I was expecting.
“The Bush administration took a lot of pride that homeownership had reached historic highs,” Mr. Snow said in an interview. “But what we forgot in the process was that it has to be done in the context of people being able to afford their house. We now realize there was a high cost.”
For much of the Bush presidency, the White House was preoccupied by terrorism and war; on the economic front, its pressing concerns were cutting taxes and privatizing Social Security. The housing market was a bright spot: ever-rising home values kept the economy humming, as owners drew down on their equity to buy consumer goods and pack their children off to college.
Lawrence B. Lindsey, Mr. Bush’s first chief economics adviser, said there was little impetus to raise alarms about the proliferation of easy credit that was helping Mr. Bush meet housing goals.
“No one wanted to stop that bubble,” Mr. Lindsey said. “It would have conflicted with the president’s own policies.”
[/quote/]
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by meliv
I agree, that is what is trying to do before the crap hit the fan and to appease a mad population in the making.
And that is what it is a temporary fix.
WASHINGTON — The FBI's caseload of fraud investigations into major corporations and banks could climb from 38 into the hundreds as the economic crisis deepens, a bureau official told Congress on Wednesday.
U.S. officials also told a Senate hearing several criminal investigations related to the $700 billion federal bailout program were already in progress.
Obama, Reid, Pelosi burn billions behind closed doors
By Examiner Editorial
- 2/11/09
For officials who came into office promising to operate the most honest and transparent White House and Congress ever, President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid seem determined to achieve exactly the opposite result. Their actions in securing passage of the $1 trillion economic stimulus bill – the total cost exceeds $1 trillion when interest is added to the $838 billion Senate or $827 billion House versions - would be laughable were not the consequences for the nation so dire. Take for example the trio’s determination to hustle the Senate-House conference committee to begin meeting within hours of Senate passage of the upper chamber’s compromise version.
Less than 48 hours elapsed between the time the text of the compromise became available for public examination late Saturday evening and yesterday’s 61-37 vote for passage. At that rate, the Senate effectively was spending about $300 million every minute while considering the compromise, and allowing taxpayers a scandalously brief opportunity to discover how the senators were doing it.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
U.S. financial probes expand as economic crisis deepens
WASHINGTON — The FBI's caseload of fraud investigations into major corporations and banks could climb from 38 into the hundreds as the economic crisis deepens, a bureau official told Congress on Wednesday.
U.S. officials also told a Senate hearing several criminal investigations related to the $700 billion federal bailout program were already in progress.
www.comcast.net...
Or is there someone at the bottom scooping it up?
Rather than rely more heavily on the Treasury, which has already put $350 billion in the nation’s banks, Representative Gary L. Ackerman sees an opportunity in the trillions of dollars in public pension funds. Most of the funds suffered giant losses last year in the market turmoil. But they do not need all of their assets immediately, because their time horizon for paying benefits is decades long.
A study by University of Chicago business school professor Austan Goolsbee focuses on President Bush’s plan to partially privatize Social Security, and finds that financial institutions stand to gain from the Bush plan—at the expense of seniors.
According to the study, the financial services industry would reap a $940 billion windfall in fees and other administrative charges for managing private accounts, while expenses could take 20 percent of the typical beneficiary's account.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Walkswithfish
Here's the thing. NO MATTER WHAT Obama does or does not do, the economy is screwed.