It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is it a deep thirst for knowledge or a spiritual/mental void that's actively being filled by overactive imaginations?
Originally posted by Sapphire
Sometimes I wonder if Humanity's common sense has evolved. At one time it was common sense to believe the world was flat, of course, that theory was disarmed. So is our common sense evolving on a daily basis?
It seems that is the case. That 'line' is a very fine one, and because our minds are forever expanding, it's quite possible that ... there are no lines to draw. Everything is weaved into another like a web. So engrained now it's become one in the same, yet separate. If we are in fact entering into a new Aeon which ends our 'human' way of thinking in that physical sense of the word 'the fine line era' as i'll call it, to a 'no line era' or The Spiritual Upgrade where there are no more rules. Then it would make sense that the reason for this expansion in new ideas and a deep thirst for knowlege is due to this 'shift' in our human evolution which would make complete and logical sense.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Preest, I agree with you. There is a dangerous seepage of new-age junk slipping into UFOlogy. Emperical evidence, testimonials and theories are being washed over by pure crap. Now, before the tidal wave of new age BS, it took some work to seperate the real from the fake. Today, it's like trying to bail water out fo the titantic with a tablespoon.
DE
I don't always agree with scientific data but I also have to take into account that I'm not a scientist and I may not like or agree with some findings but that's where common sense comes into play...I can either accept the findings or sit down with pen and paper and CREATE my own findings based on a small piece of star wars here and a small piece of star trek there. I agree that not everything can be taken at face value and not everything can be proven with data...but there DOES have to be a line correct?
Originally posted by Sapphire
Or it's just that people are so full of themselves that nothing is correct unless its backed up by some kind of scientific mumbo jumbo?
True...that would be an even more interesting reply if I believed in the Christ others did lol...I see what you're saying but you seem to be skirting what I'm saying...when do we say no to junk?
Originally posted by Sapphire
Common Sense tells us that walking on water is impossible however, according to Belief aka the very words of Jesus Christ, it's very possible.
Originally posted by Preest
I don't always agree with scientific data but I also have to take into account that I'm not a scientist and I may not like or agree with some findings but that's where common sense comes into play...I can either accept the findings or sit down with pen and paper and CREATE my own findings based on a small piece of star wars here and a small piece of star trek there. I agree that not everything can be taken at face value and not everything can be proven with data...but there DOES have to be a line correct?
Originally posted by Sapphire
Or it's just that people are so full of themselves that nothing is correct unless its backed up by some kind of scientific mumbo jumbo?
Or is mass suicide and whatever other tragedies this community as a whole may see in the future part of the spiritual upgrade?
Originally posted by Preest
True...that would be an even more interesting reply if I believed in the Christ others did lol...I see what you're saying but you seem to be skirting what I'm saying...when do we say no to junk?
Originally posted by Sapphire
Common Sense tells us that walking on water is impossible however, according to Belief aka the very words of Jesus Christ, it's very possible.
I can leave this board and come back in a month with 30 years of history for an alien civilization as well as a homeworld and intimate details of the species and their religious beliefs and their interaction with mankind...does that make it real?
Common sense tells you no...a few of the loons on this board would say yes and even take my story on as their own experiences. Is that common sense?
Good question, and I plan to answer that but...I need a smoke though...between partaking in some intelligent convo on this forum (FINALLY!) and scripting a comic series my mind is turning into mush...I need to give in to my addicitions. Be back in a few.
Originally posted by Sapphire
True, however, where is the line drawn when it comes to what people consider Immoral? Some people think censorship is immoral, others believe that it's necessary in order to keep us from becoming a chaotic race of people who dont have lines, so is drawing a line considered censorship? Who's right and who's not? What are your thoughts on this.
Originally posted by Preest
Good question, and I plan to answer that but...I need a smoke though...between partaking in some intelligent convo on this forum (FINALLY!) and scripting a comic series my mind is turning into mush...I need to give in to my addicitions. Be back in a few.
Originally posted by Sapphire
True, however, where is the line drawn when it comes to what people consider Immoral? Some people think censorship is immoral, others believe that it's necessary in order to keep us from becoming a chaotic race of people who dont have lines, so is drawing a line considered censorship? Who's right and who's not? What are your thoughts on this.
[Edited on 4-14-2004 by Preest]
Originally posted by robertfenix
There are two ways to take the passage of Jesus walking on water.
1. The fanatical bible thumper point of view that says Jesus was there and that (peter?) fell into the water because he questioned his faith.
or
2. Jesus may have actually been able to walk on water (or not) and "allowed" Peter to perform the same ability to show him the power of faith, but once you lose faith or you begin to question your faith then the world (ie the water) will swallow you up. Jesus may have told this story to Peter instead of "performing" it. So that he could understand the power of faith. Peter might have experienced a kind of virtual reality in his mind and been able to "walk along" with Jesus as Jesus was telling him this passage. Since Jesus is the most evolved human form, it is likely that he could manipulate all thought and body functions to achieve his desired effects. Thus Jesus, while telling the story to Peter, simultaneously altered Peter's reality so that in his mind he was actually living what Jesus was speaking to him, similar to being under hypnosis. Thus Peter's ? retelling of the passage becomes a "real" event if taken word for word, instead of a parabol to explain that the power of faith can overcome even what seems impossible.
If this is true then other events in the bible could have been manipulated in the same manner, group hypnosis could explain why the followers thought the bread or fish was multiplied on the hill. Jesus made them "think" that they were eating when maybe they were just eating "air".
Could this indeed be possible ?
Originally posted by mepatriot
The Bible says that in the end times (Revelations) "I will send a strong delusion, that if it were possible, even the elect might be deceived."
Again, that's only 'if' Revelations is in fact accurate.
I think that the UFO phenomenon will be used by the demons (possibly as demons--taking on these God/Satan-permitted forms) to convince the world to follow their Satanic world government (666 imprints and all) so that only they can "save us" from the "UFOs"...those of us who say otherwise will be those who are hunted down by the "beast system" JMOs
Originally posted by Preest
Back again...here's my main issue...Are the believers right or wrong or is it the people who perpetuate foolishness? And if it's those who perpetuate...where and when do we draw the line?
As I said before...I can simply take a few weeks and create a highly detailed account of an alien civilization and then describe in detail how I know all of this...but, I'd be lying. So...when somebody does the same as I...do we call them out as a community or do we simply assume that they could be right based on the fact that we have no proof they're wrong? What happens when a crazed follower of David Icke assassinates Pres. Bush because he SAW him turn to a lizard alien? Did he see it? Was David right or did we not draw a line in the sand before he got out of hand and started causing his fans to see the lizards around ever corner?